The orientation of over 510 ancient pyramids and temples randomly spread around the world appears to correlate profoundly with the temperature changes during the last series of glaciation cycles. Most ancient structures are therefore hundreds of thousands of years old. Renovations on top of older foundations didn’t change the orientation of the original foundations. Orientation of ancient structures is, beyond any doubt, a very powerful mathematical signal.
Why Orientation is the Key to Unlock Ancient Mysteries
The orientation of a building is purely mathematical, because orientation is dimensionless or not materialistic. While the size, weight, or chemical composition of a structure might change, its orientation is by definition independent from materialistic properties.
When we process the orientations of virtually all ancient buildings around the world it reveals a great discovery. This research is so new, so innovating, that you won’t find anything like this anywhere else, except maybe some copies of this original material on other websites.
The former article How Old Are Pyramids Around the World? showed some aspects of the orientation of pyramids and temples. Many astronomical, religious and even political buildings, like the pyramids of Giza, the Yerkes Observatory, the White House, the Taj Mahal, Angkor Wat, and the Vatican are up to this day cardinally oriented, meaning they are effectively oriented to the current geographic poles.
Some people are so shocked by the vast array of observations supporting this new mathematical model that they simply deny there is any evidence for this to be true. This rejection of mathematical facts can become very animated at times but a few people are sufficiently curious to carefully investigate the facts supporting that the glaciation cycles were in fact crustal deformations.
These facts are heavily supported not only by flood myths and stories of Gods from the Sky, but also by scientific observations, like orientation of ancient sites, paleomagnetic data, orbital data of the Earth, and ice core data. All data is pointing in one direction and one direction only.
Most people are even more shocked when they find out which time frames we are actually talking about. We’ve learned to think in terms of a few thousand years, while we are in fact speaking of a time frame of over 440,000 years. When you think that a structure of 12,000 years is whopping old, you need to get used to this method. The youngest time frame is between 0 and 26,000 years, which is related to our current North Pole, the spin axis of the Earth (not the magnetic pole).
The pyramids of Giza belong to the youngest ancient structures on this planet.
The Method in Short
The method explores the phenomenon of orientation of pyramids and temples spread all around the world and combines them to one big mathematical pattern. The shift pattern correlates so closely to the temperature peaks and valleys of the last series of ice ages that the odds for these patterns to fit onto each other coincidentally is 1 to 576.
When we examine the patterns more closely we find an even more rare chance for these complicated physical patterns to fit coincidentally onto each other of 1 to 750,000, i.e. it’s very unlikely to be coincidence.
It’s not some statistical glitch, on the contrary, it’s a very strong mathematical signal from more than 510 independent ancient structures around the world. A signal that never has been discovered before, comparable with an encrypted message from outer space.
About 56% of the 513 randomly spread ancient structures that were involved in this research accumulate massively in only 5 clusters. The clusters accumulate vertically up and around Greenland. The probability that these clusters could occur coincidentally in this way is close to zero.
Mathematical Nodes Running Over Greenland
The consequences of this typical clustering are profound since the structures, like noted before, are randomly spread around the world, hence are not connected to each other. The probability that these 5 clusters occur coincidentally in this way is a whopping 2.3·10-67.
Of all possible places are these nodes running over Greenland, the large island which has a huge ice sheet of unknown origin.
It is the ultimate proof for the existence of former, ancient geographic poles, revealing the true age of ancient structures. Proof for corresponding latitudinal crustal displacements. The growing size of these clusters show how the crust was deformed due to the displacements. The older the clusters, the larger the deformations become. Isn’t that logical?
It also explains simple and elegantly why and how the vast, thick ice sheet on Greenland was initially formed. This ice sheet on Greenland is the last remnant of the huge “ice age” sheet that ones covered North America, North Europe, and North Russia. It’s now suddenly obvious that this ice sheet will melt, and why it will melt. It’s also proof why CO2 lags behind on changing temperatures and why it is not responsible for climate change. It goes many ways, solving the many yet unsolved problems.
But it sweeps mainstream ideas regarding history, paleontology, archaeology, climatology, and geology off the table as fairy tales for adults. Mathematics is the only immutable truth wherever you are, whatever you do, whatever you believe.
Ice Ages Were Crustal Displacements
This new holistic, fully mathematical theory or method provides a full framework about Humanities ancient history in relation to the Earth. It does not leave a single doubt about the unbelievable truth, and finally explains virtually all the ancient mysteries. Deluges were no myths, they were caused by crustal displacements. Science has in fact registered these events as glaciation cycles.
It is also crucial to grasp that not all ancient buildings were oriented to an ancient geo pole. Over 40% of the ancient buildings are not aligned to one of the nodes. Isn’t that logical? After all, we don’t live in a perfect world.
Did you ever ask yourself Why is Greenland Covered in Ice? Scientists try to solve this question already for many decennials, without actually making any progress. It is an impossible undertaking with the assumption that the Earth’s crust is fixed. The crust appeared to have crept exclusively in the latitudinal direction over extended periods of time when the Earth was in high eccentric orbit around the Sun.
That is why the graph of Earth’s eccentric orbit around the Sun fits so perfectly over the glaciation graph. Science has no clue why that is. The large rotational variations of the Earth during high eccentric orbits (similar as our Moon) generate a perpendicular reaction force, when large enough, caused the crust to crawl in the latitudinal direction over extended periods of time.
But rationality has profound consequences on our grasp of ancient history as you will see. Humanity, as well as the ancient sites, are much more ancient than you ever imagined to be possible.
Powerful Mathematical Signal That Greenland Moved Over the North Pole
Ancient Buildings Working as a Compass
Imagine you’re going to build yourself a home on the heath, in the middle of nowhere. Your new home is going to be square or rectangular. What will make you decide its orientation? The cardinals? To the Sun? Or something else? What could this something else possibly be? How would you orient an astronomical observatory? These are important questions for you to become aware of. Most architects will align according to the cardinals when they have enough space to do so.
It is generally believed there were no advanced structure building humanoids around when Earth was in the middle of a series of ice ages, some 350,000 years ago. How do we know that is true? Because there is no “evidence”?
Let’s be clear about evidence, have you ever seen evidence that was not overthrown by other, newer evidence? When kilos, Newtons, meters, seconds, Joules, and so on are involved in your primary evidence it will be overthrown one day by other evidence.
What is orientation? It is dimensionless, hence pure mathematical and not materialistic. For example 90° = ½π and 180° = π. And so on. Location likewise, solely degrees or Pi as you will. Meaning there are no materialistic units attached to it. By defining ancient buildings like this, they appear to show us a way to an ultimate truth: our real history.
Once you’ve grasped this concept completely, a whole new world will unfold to you!
Ancient buildings like pyramids and temples appear to be compasses, especially because we processed them in large numbers. The patterns are mind boggling, and prove the relation between ancient structures and glaciation cycles. Glaciation cycles turn out to be caused by latitudinal crustal shifts, hence causing “ice ages”.
Examples of Orientations
Why Satellite Footage is Preferred Over Field Work
It appears we are able to prove the age of pyramids by their orientation without digging into the ground or putting even one step on a pyramid. That is the difference between materialistic sensory based science and mathematics.
How is this research done? By mass processing the orientation and locations of ancient buildings we were able to prove in which time frame certain pyramids were built. The interconnectedness between orientation and age has profound consequences as you will see.
One decade of satellite footage did more than centuries of digging. Although it might be necessary to dig the foundations up from under thick layers of soil, examining satellite footage is preferred over digging.
The Orientation of Two Cardinally Oriented Pyramids
Why We Need an Intersection Line
When we want to find the intersection point of two randomly picked structures, which are non-cardinally oriented, there is a large chance that this intersection point won’t reveal anything significantly. The intersection point can be located anywhere on the globe. It is highly unlikely that such a research would reveal something fruitful. Buying a lottery ticket would be a better investment.
It is for example easy to verify that the intersection point of the pyramids of Giza and the pyramid of Ping of Han in China intersect each other on the current geographical North pole. We simply know what this means; they were meant to be oriented in this way. But what about the 85% non-cardinal oriented structures?
Can we do the same with two structures which are oriented under an arbitrary angle? For example: can we do that with Teotihuacan and the Great Ziggurat of Ur? The intersection point of these two is: 35.050N, 93.675W. What do we think to find here? In fact, nothing of importance we can verify. Hence, there is no way to verify we are connecting two different structures that might have something in common. Or perhaps more importantly, we have no idea why they were “uncardinnally” oriented in the first place. There is no archaeologist who can tell you why Teotihuacan nor the Great Ziggurat of Ur are oriented in the way they are.
When we want to mass process larger amounts of data we need an intersection line. This line is so to speak neutral. The line is a pure mathematical entity.
How on Earth can we create such an imaginary line? That was one of the biggest efforts in the research, to find a scientific reliable way to determine such a line. The above shown massive point cloud (fig. 3) played an important role in finding the right coordinates of the intersection line.
How the Intersection Line is Determined
Why the Crust Moved Latitudinally
Some people wonder how the crust shifted so perfectly in the latitudinal direction. It didn’t shift perfectly. It moved in an irregular pattern along a rough latitudinal path over a period of hundreds of thousands of years. The crust moved latitudinally because it obeys the laws of a spinning top reacting right-angled on a causative force. The causative force is the Sun’s oscillating pull during high eccentric orbits. That is the reason why the glaciation patterns and eccentricity (part of Milankovitch’s cycles) fit perfectly over each other.
In fact did the crust not move equally. It was heavily deformed while Antarctica hardly moved. The Pacific was stretched while the Atlantic was compressed. That is the reason why these parts look like they do. The Earth appears to be much more lively than Geologists always assumed.
Further down below you find illustrations indicating the Poles I to V with red dots. The size of the red dot grows with the age of the pole. The path of the pole is defined within the sizes of the red dots, so that’s not perfectly a straight line, but clearly roughly in the latitudinal direction.
The reasons for the red dots to become larger is caused by the growing uncertainties of defining a pole within a certain diameter, i.e. the crust has been deformed seriously due to the crustal displacements.
Orientations on Both Hemispheres Are Fundamentally Different
Probability of Such a Spread
The probability that a large amount of buildings, randomly spread around the world are oriented like this is so small it surely is not coincidental. That’s why we are 100% sure these buildings were massively oriented to one feature that is common wherever we are on Earth: a geographic pole.
The only correct conclusion is that the crust has been deformed significantly over the last 400,000 years, without geology even noticing this fact. They measured it, sure, but didn’t interpreted it as a movement of the crust. They interpreted it as “glaciation cycles”. Logical, when you believe the crust is fixed. Strangely enough do geologists believe in the movement of the magnetic field, because it is obviously much more volatile than the rigid crust, but the evidence of paleomagnetism is in fact overwhelming that the crust did move.
So we have proof from different angles which are pointing to the same unbelievable truth. The biblical cataclysms were real.
On the other hand it is also indisputable proof there were pyramid builders around who pointed their structures to a very ancient pole. It goes many ways, deep down into the rabbit hole.
Collective Orientation of Contemporary Buildings
You might possibly expect that if we do the same kind of research to the orientation of contemporary buildings, we would, for some odd reason, find a collective orientation that differs from North likewise as the ancient buildings. But that doesn’t appear to be the case. The collective orientation of contemporary buildings points almost exactly towards our current geographic pole, our current cardinal system.
You might say that the collective unconscious orients itself to the geographical pole, or as many people would say, to the Sun. The more data you gather, whether it is in a region, one country, one continent, or the whole world, the more obvious it becomes that contemporary buildings add up to the geographical pole. There is no contemporary culture to find that has a preference for a specific orientation other than a cardinal orientation.
This large scale investigation is part of the big project to prove that ancient buildings largely differ in orientation, and that this deviation has a reason: the geographic pole was at another location back then. A very, very long time ago. Mathematics completely contradicts what contemporary history books are telling us. History is about storytelling and has in fact nothing to do with reality.
We built a random location generator for every continent and generated a list of 392 contemporary buildings with their location and their respective orientation. When we add them up together they are pointing to our current geo pole within ±0.5°. This proves that when we add up the orientation of large amounts of independent buildings they will always point to their geographic pole.
The Raw Data – First Indications of Crustal Shifts
What is the Time Frame For These Ancient Poles?
The interpretation of this whole new view on ancient times is that when the crust shifts (and thus the pole) in the latitudinal direction, it causes a new glaciation cycle.
Most researchers, even the most controversial ones, keep sticking in a time frame of a few thousands years. They have never dared to even think in terms of hundreds of thousands of years. That is the reason why the countless ancient structures as well as all the myths keep shrouded in mysteries.
The last glaciation started 110,000 years ago and ended 12,000 years ago. Pyramids that are oriented to the former pole are thus older than 110,000 years, and younger than the glaciation prior to that, approximately 200,000 years.
This interpretation sheds a completely different light on our history and gives the required space to explain all the mysteries that no one has ever solved before. There are simply too many mysteries around the world that scholars like to compress in less than 10,000 years, which is, to put it mildly, completely irrational. The amount of labor necessary to build all these tens of thousands of structures in a few thousand years were not present. That’s another indicator that the official time lines are incorrect.
Which mysteries you might think? You must juggle a long list of mysterious sites continuously in your head to remind yourself to the fact that none of the ancient mysteries really have been solved yet.
- Why do we find hundreds of pyramids all around the planet?
- Why do we find thousands of dolmens all around the planet?
- What about Tiwanaku, Puma Punku, Sacsayhuaman, Teotihuacan, Göbekli Tepe? Thousands of them. Everywhere.
- What about the Nazca lines?
- Have we ever unanimously solved how the pyramids of Giza were built, not to talk about when and why? That’s still just one of the thousands of mysteries.
- Have you ever heard of the mysterious Kailasa temple? Look it up, it will make you feel humble again.
- What about Baalbek, Mount Shoria (Russia), Stonehenge, Carnac, Eastern Island, and Yonaguni?
- What about the underground city of Derinkuyu in Turkey?
And that list is just one grain of sand in a whole mountain of sand. Keep that in mind!
To proof the correct time line requires more than only indicators. We need sufficient mathematical proof to support the claim for this enormously stretched time line.
Why Ice Ages Were Latitudinal Crustal Shifts
The Mayan, Aztec, and Inca Cultures Are Much Older
The Mayan, Aztec, and Inca cultures are much older than scholars always told us. Why were these cultures suddenly gone? Scholars have never found a credible explanation for the sudden disappearance of these highly developed cultures, except mythos stories, opinions, and just ideas.
When scholars claim the civilization abandoned a city for example in the 9th century AD, they are actually talking about the people who used the cities, not about the people who built the cities. That is quite a difference.
Because the pyramids are massively oriented towards the old North pole, the peoples who built them experienced the destructive crustal shift, warping them back into the “stone age”. It would be very difficult to survive such a catastrophe.
It now appears that especially these cultures are amazingly older than always was assumed. The oldest traces go back to over 500,000 years!
How the Rough Data Corresponds to the Found Intersection Clusters
How to Interpret Glaciations
The temperatures on Earth depend of the latitude where you are. It’s crucial to grasp that you can interpret a glacial period in two ways:
- The classical view: During a glaciation the geo pole was where it currently is, but the temperature changed. Which mechanism caused this glaciation is still unexplained. To believe that the Milankovitch cycles were the cause of the ice ages is an often parroted unexamined believe. Earth is a sphere, and will always receive the same amount of solar energy, no matter how the sphere is rotated towards the Sun. The climate will show ripples of about ±1.4°C, but won’t dive globally 12°C due to an arbitrary effect.
- The new view: A glaciation was caused by a crustal shift or heavy crustal deformations. The amount of shift corresponds to the temperature change of the glaciation cycle. The crustal shift moved the cold North pole region to a warmer region and a warmer region into the polar section. When geologists examine the phenomenon with the assumption that the crust was fixed, the findings are interpreted as a global cooling down, which in fact never happened. At least not on this scale. The crustal ‘crawling’ was caused by a high eccentric orbit of the Earth around the Sun. That is why the patterns of eccentricity and glaciation so strikingly match together. How this works is explained in this article. The crustal shifts went very slowly – between 15 to 35 meters average per year, depending on the rate of eccentricity. The crawling process has clear start and stop thresholds, and proceeds over periods of tens of thousands of years. Science has still a long way ahead to understand how this exactly works, and why the crust moved along this path. Paleomagnetic records shows correlations with the crawling crust. Other evidence is obvious: high dust concentrations in the atmosphere during the crawling process due to very heavy volcano eruptions. The geological patterns are clear, and the mathematical proof from the orientation patterns of ancient sites removes all doubts. Humanity was warped back into the Stone Age.
In the case that the crust shifted, the temperature changes in that specific “ice age” must correspond with the temperature differences between the two latitudes. Which they do, as I will show you further down in this article.
The Consequences of This Classification
This interpretation allows to date the cultures of former pyramid builders in a more reliable manner, via their orientation, which on its turn can be related to a glaciation cycle. Every glaciation cycle stands for an era. There are however structures which do not match with one of the former poles. Dating these structures requires a thorough investigation by using the path of the pole, since it is possible these structures were built during periods of crustal unrest. Dating structures is now done for Chichen Itza, Stonehenge, and the Nuraghes on Sardinia. More structures will follow.
Every crustal shift is followed by an alleged cooling down (that is because the classical view dictates that the crust is fixed). Polar ice sheets that have been shifted to warmer regions will cool that region, and the ice sheets will start to melt very slowly. Melting takes place over a period of tens of thousand of years. The warmer region that shifted to the pole becomes now cold as well. The melting energy must be provided by the Gulf Streams, that transports the energy from the equator to the icecaps (in accordance with the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics). That is why there is a Warm Gulf stream running close to Greenland – it is restoring a balance.
The result of this phenomenon is that the temperatures on Earth dropped a little bit because of ice sheets that moved to a warmer region, and energy is pumped to the polar region. The shifted ice sheets cool the region in two ways, by reflection of sunlight and convection.
The warmer region that moved to the pole receives less sunlight and slowly cools down. The effect is a ripple of the global temperatures, but certainly no temperature change between 8° to 12°.
The consequence of this classification is that ancient civilizations and the structures they built are much older than always assumed, and it literally dismisses the mainstream interpretations as adhoc and illogical.
This new interpretation explains glaciations and everything else in the most simple way and with the fewest assumptions, which is the major condition to comply to Occam’s Razor.
Gathered and Analyzed Data
Ancient Sites and Constructions
Found Orientation Clusters
Results of the Data Analyses
How the Crust Moved Over the Last 440,000 Years
Why Shifted the Crust in This Direction?
The most probable path of the pole is in the latitudinal direction. It is a direct result of physics. Similar as the reaction of a spinning top on an external force, it reacts in the perpendicular direction of its rotation, and that is why the crust shifted like this.
The forces in this case are the large tidal forces when Earth is in a high eccentric orbit around the Sun. The interconnectedness is deeper explained in this article:”Lost Civilizations and Earth Crust Shifts”
Five Geographic Poles: Mathematically Proven
The Time Frame – A Shortlist of Ancient Structures
Pyramids, Sites, Temples
I: 0 – 26,000 years ago
Borobudur, Konark Sun Temple, Temple of Horus, Pyramids of Giza, Tomb of Emperor Ping of Han
26,000 – 130,000
|Period of crustal deformation: Pole II to Pole I|
II: 130,000 – 155,000 years ago
Babylon, Prasat Phum Prasat, Uxmal (Pyramid of the magician), El Mirador, Ka’ba-ye Zartosht
|155,000 – 210,000||
Period of crustal deformation: Pole III to Pole II
III: 210,000 – 225,000 years ago
Teotihuacan, Pompeii (temples), Carnac, Edzna, Tomb of Emperor Zhao of Han, Antipatris
|225,000 – 240,000||
Period of crustal deformation: Pole IV to Pole III
IV: 240,000 – 270,000 years ago
Yagul, Kuara (Sumer), Great Kyz Kala, El Castillo (Chichen Itza), Pyramid of Koh-Ker
|270,000 – 330,000||
Period of crustal deformation: Pole V to Pole IV
V: 330,000 – 345,000 years ago
Tomb of Three Kings of Zhou, Der (Sumer), Nohoch Mul pyramid (Cobá), Caral, Madinet Habu temple, Borsippa (Sumer)
|345,000 – 410,000||
Period of crustal deformation: Pole V to Pole VI
VI: 410,000 – 440,000 years ago
Nineveh (Sumer), Sippar (Sumer), Eridu (Sumer), Pyramids of Cochasqui (nr. 5, 9 ,14), Huaca del Sol, Zabala (Sumer), Caral
Why Ice Ages Were Earth Crust Displacements
The Average Temperature Gradient
Important to note is that the average temperature gradient of 0.576°C per degree latitude that you find in fig. 16 is calculated based upon the surface area to which the specific temperature belongs. For example at the poles it is very cold, but the surface areas of the poles is very small compared to that of the equator. Hence are the poles not significantly contributing to the so called ΔT, the temperature differences.
The reason why this temperature gradient is used in this way in this research is that the temperature reconstructions from the ice cores use a similar method. What we in fact do here is transforming the data from the ice cores and recalculate them into a latitudinal displacement of the crust.
As Above, So Below
There is a large amount of data processed to calculate, to prove the position of the former poles, and also to calculate the reliability of this new theory.
It is crucial to grasp that Antarctica hardly moved its position at the pole, while Greenland was catapulted over the pole. When we look at the Pacific we’re looking at a huge uninterrupted plate which has been stretched due to the deformations. That’s why there is no continent (anymore) in the Pacific. Australia was ripped off from Antarctica. Zealandia became submerged in the massive stretch movement.
When we look at the other side we see that the opposite happened. A massive compression took place which resulted in the spreading of the continents, a crack in the middle of the Atlantic, and the resulting movement of Greenland over the pole towards the equator. The time scale of these large deformations is much shorter than geologists ever anticipated. Yes, there are tectonic forces and the tectonic plates move towards each other or from each other. But there is clearly a force present that geologists have never recognized.
The Earth is apparently much more dynamical than we ever anticipated. The book deals extensively with this subject, because it is hard to grasp although crucial. When it comes to deformation does the Earth seem to behave like a flat plane! The Earth is a sphere which behaves sometimes as if it’s flat. Compare it with a photon; it can behave like a particle or like a wave, depending which part you’re studying.
There is a growing group of believers in the flat Earth theory. You can compare this group with physicists who believe that a photon is ultimately a wave. The other group, the believers that Earth is a sphere, are the physicists who believe that a photon is a particle. The difficulty is that both groups hold part of the truth. Our egoic conditioned mind can only grasp one of both, hence both camps of believers.
One thing is sure: as above, so below.
The orientation of the foundations of ancient buildings, especially because they were processed in large numbers, gave profound insights in ancient times.
Ice age graphs correspond to the eccentricity of Earth’s orbit over the last 800,000 years. The chance for these two graphs to correspond to eachother coincidentally is 0.00069% or 1 to 145,000. It shows we have to look here (eccentric orbit) for the explanations of ice ages and nowhere else.
When we dive into the motion mechanisms of large celestial objects, we see mainly two things happening:
- eccentricity causes variations in rotation speed of the minor object (in this case the Earth). Inner parts of the Earth are much heavier than the crust, hence they will react less intense on tidal forces of the Sun.
- tidal forces vary on an annual basis (in case of Earth). The larger the eccentricity the larger the tidal variations. At perihelion the Sun pulls hardest on Earth, almost egg-shaping the Earth. At aphelion the Sun pulls less on the Earth. At an eccentricity of between 0.03 and 0.05 these annual forces can vary up to about 26%, putting the Earth’s different layers under different sorts of stress.
From this we can relatively easy understand what happens: a latitudinal reaction force is born. Compare it with a spinning top that reacts perpendicular to any external force exercised on it. This reaction force drives the lightest parts of the Earth, the crust, to crawl during high eccentric orbit around the Sun.
The data indicates with a very high degree of certainty that the former pole was on Greenland. The crust has moved not just a bit, it moved significantly. It moved over an angle of 38° over the last 330,000 years.
The crust ticks like a clock on eccentricity.
The Moving Crust Turns Everything Upside Down
Greenland, that is to say the whole crust was heavily deformed – leaving Antarctica surprisingly stable at its current position – and moved over the geographic North pole between 250,000 and 110,000 years ago in two shifts, meaning that Greenland has three former geo pole locations. Similar as three fence poles have two distances in between. The Greenland ice sheet is a result from this era, and that is the reason why it is melting now
Earth Crust Shifts do not happen overnight. It are slow, unstoppable processes that take place over extended periods of time. The most violent, swift crustal shifts took place over a period of about 15,000 years. The slowest ones over a period of about 100,000 years. But it is a period of constant turmoil, megaquakes, sloshing oceans, volcano eruptions, tsunamis, and a changing climate due to the shifting latitude. Sea levels will subsequently fall or rise depending of the position of the new geographic pole. Whether the pole is in sea or at land makes a world of difference in the formation of ice sheets.
An Earth Crust Shift is not the spectacular event that many people think it is. It is a massive, slow, environmental disruptive, extremely powerful deformation process of the crust, which made many of the ancient peoples to migrate to other places. It also caused massive extinctions of the Human population which we call lost civilizations. I like to call it Atlantis, because it is right under our noses and we collectively fail to recognize it.
The Probability That the Whole Theory is Correct
The probability (chance) that temperature changes during the last ice ages accidentally correspond to the found mathematical hot spots is 1 to 746,496 or 0.000134%. It is therefore for more than 99.99987% certain that this combination is true:
- that the crust is heavily deformed in the latitudinal direction;
- that Antarctica remained (almost) stable at its current position;
- that the shifts relate to ice ages in that specific order and magnitude;
- that ancient structures were oriented to these former geo North poles;
- that a high eccentric orbit around the Sun is the cause of crustal shifts or deformations;
- that Greenland’s ice sheet was once formed on the North pole, and that its massive ice sheet will melt on the long term, because it has moved to a place of moderate temperatures;
- that CO2 therefore lags behind on temperature changes, hence is not the (main) cause of temperature changes.
Atlantis is Here
This new view will have consequences on the long run how science will look at our history and to what happened with the Earth’s crust. Of course will it take time for this theory to mature, and to be widely accepted as valid. The insights in this new theory are currently developing very rapidly.
An example of just one of the many profound implications this theory might have: how much chance is there that paleomagnetism, which is a highly technical and well funded discipline, developed a correct theory? Just for 50%. Yes, you read it correct. Why is that? Because it ignored and dismissed the possibility of a slow latitudinal crawling crust during high eccentric orbits of the Earth around the Sun. These crustal movements would also leave traces in the magnetizable sediments. There is no way to recognize from the samples alone what has moved – the core or the crust. Because of the fact that the magnetic core obviously moves, it is therefore not by definition the only variable that left traces.
The book which is currently in the making under the working title “Atlantis is Here” (title might change) will turn many generally accepted paradigms into dust, not by swinging words at you, but by using mathematics in a way most people will understand.
The book will provide, besides all the proof necessary to show what happened in the distant past, a framework to understand how we can develop a new look at lost civilizations, and what really happened to them. It will also help to understand who we are and where we came from. It will solve many mysteries, and it will raise many new questions at the same time.
© 2015, 2016, 2017 by Mario Buildreps
First publication: 11 December 2015