Orientation patterns of more than 910 ancient pyramids, sites, and temples, randomly spread around the world, correlates with the temperature changes of the last series of glaciation cycles. Most ancient monuments are hundreds of thousands of years old. Renovations of ancient monuments were done on top of their much older foundations, leaving most of the original orientations intact. The orientation of ancient monuments is, beyond any doubt, a very potent mathematical data analysis tool, revealing an astounding, inescapable truth.
Make a donation if you like our work and support our ongoing research. or visit our Patreon page
Why Orientation is the Key to Unlock Ancient Mysteries
The orientation of a building is purely mathematical because orientation is dimensionless, i.e., not physical. While the size, weight, or chemical composition of a structure might change, its orientation is, by definition, independent of material properties.
Many astronomical, religious, and even political buildings, like the pyramids of Giza, the Yerkes Observatory, the White House, the Taj Mahal, Angkor Wat, and the Vatican, are cardinally oriented. Their architects oriented them to our current cardinal system, and that means to our existing geographic pole.
When we process the orientations of virtually all ancient buildings around the world, it reveals a great discovery. Our research is so new, so innovating and refreshingly novel that you will not find anything like this anywhere else, except maybe some copies of this original material on other websites.
Some people are shocked by the vast array of facts that supports our revolutionary model that is entirely mathematical. They deny that there is any evidence for this to be true and go on with their lives. However, who dares to deny established mathematical facts?
The facts of our new dating model are not only supported by our mathematical proof, but also by flood myths and stories of “Visitors from the Sky.” As if that is not enough our conclusion is furthermore supported by scientific observations such as the orientation of ancient sites, paleomagnetic data, orbital data of the Earth, and ice core data. All data is pointing in only one compelling direction. There is no escape; there is no place to hide from our conclusions.
Most people are even more shocked when they discover which time frames we have mathematically proven in our theory. While we have all been conditioned to think in terms of a few thousand years, here we are considering a time frame of human history of more than 350,000 years.
The pyramids of Giza belong to the youngest ancient structures on this planet. They are the crowning achievement of very advanced civilizations that once spanned the entire planet.
Simplicity is the Key – How the Method Works
Our method explores the orientation of pyramids and temples spread all around the world and combines them in a database. What we have discovered is that their orientation extensions result in one significant mathematical geodetic pattern. The resulting pattern appears to form several nodes. The probability that nodes of considerable size, resulting from the hundreds of intersecting orientation extensions, can occur randomly has been calculated and is close to zero for each intersection node.
Because the nodes occur in a latitudinal direction, they point to drastic climate changes, and we suggest that these are due to a series of crustal deformations. Remarkably, in every instance, we see that the distances between nodes correlate with the temperature peaks and valleys of the last series of ice ages. Moreover, of all possible places on our planet where these nodes could show up, they occur massively around Greenland. The odds for this concentrated nodal pattern to follow coincidentally the same sequence as the substantial temperature changes over the last series of ice ages is 1 to 256. We are talking about a time frame of 350,000 years.
However, when we examine these patterns more closely, we find an even rarer chance of 1 to 750,000 for the latitudinal pattern of nodes and temperature changes to fit coincidentally onto each other in this specific region. It appears to be improbable to be coincidental altogether.
To the contrary, it is not some statistical glitch but a very potent mathematical “signal” from more than 900 independent ancient structures around the world. We have discovered an ancient phenomenon that traditional science has completely overlooked, comparable to an encrypted message from outer space. It is time to wake up!
The Orientation of Ancient Structures is the Key to a Deeper Insight
Mathematical Nodes Running Over Greenland
Of all possible places, why are these nodes running over Greenland, the large island which has a vast ice sheet of unknown origin? Moreover, if that is not enough, why do the distances between the nodes correlate with the glaciation graphs shown below? Could that all be just coincidence? It does not appear to be so. The probability that this is all the product of a random coincidental process is 0,000133%.
It is the most profound proof for the existence of former, ancient geographic poles, revealing the actual age of ancient structures. Our method delivers proof of corresponding latitudinal crustal displacements. The growing size of these clusters shows how the crust deformed in the past due to the displacements. The older the clusters, the larger is the extent of the deformations. Isn’t that logical?
Our theory also explains simple and elegantly why and how the vast, thick ice sheet on Greenland grew. Due to deformation cycles of the crust moved Greenland over the spin axis. Greenland’s ice sheet is now the last remnant of the vast glaciers that once covered North America, North Europe, and partially Northern Russia. Is it not obvious now that this ice sheet will melt, and why it will melt? Greenland’s location is at a latitude that is not sufficiently cold to make the ice sheet to grow further. It is not cold enough to sustain the vast ice sheet in the long term, i.e., it will melt very slowly.
Many Scientific Ideas Need to be Revised
It is now also easy to understand why CO2 lags on changing temperatures and why it cannot be held responsible for substantial climatic changes. We can now solve the many yet unsolved problems.
What many climate scientists never seem to have noticed is that Greenland is also the center point of the Laurentide ice sheet, the Innuition ice sheet, and the Scandinavian ice sheet.
As a climate scientist, to “create” an icecap on Greenland by playing with computer models with the assumption this island has never been on the geographic pole requires the strangest, most unscientific models you can imagine. Climate science has nothing to do with real science – it is a pseudoscience that mostly serves the agendas of politicians. Mainstream scientists do not dare to oppose this agenda and are afraid to lose their funding.
Our discovery questions a host of mainstream ideas regarding history, paleontology, archaeology, climatology, and geology. Mathematics, as the Queen of Science, does not care about ideas built on material “evidence.” Mathematics is the only immutable truth wherever we are, whatever we do, whatever we believe, and no matter how much mathematics is hated or feared. Mathematics can show us that most generally accepted ideas, from history to geology, are based on corrupted science, i.e., wrong belief systems.
Mathematical Signal That the North Pole Migrated in Relation to Ancient Structures
Ice Ages Were Crustal Displacements
Our new holistic, entirely mathematical paradigm provides a working hypothesis dealing with Humanity’s ancient history in relation to the Earth. It does not leave a single doubt regarding the unbelievable truth of humanity’s antiquity, and finally, it explains virtually many of the ancient mysteries. Deluges were no myths; crustal deformations caused them. Science has found the ultimate evidence for these events in the ice cores of Antarctica, but it failed to interpret them correctly, and claimed that they were “ice ages.”
It is also crucial to realize that not all ancient buildings were oriented to an ancient geographical pole. We found that more than 37.3% of ancient buildings do not align with one of the nodes. Isn’t that entirely normal? After all, we do not live in a perfect world. Not all ancient architects oriented their structures to the cardinal directions, but the majority chose to do so, and thus they left an indelible and essential message for us.
We proved with our new dating method that the crust had crept exclusively in the latitudinal direction over extended periods when the Earth was in high eccentric orbit around the Sun. Antarctica, strangely enough, did not move and remained at a relatively stable position.
Why Only Eccentricity Correlates With Glaciation Cycles
The graph of Earth’s eccentric orbit around the Sun fits perfectly over the glaciation graph (Fig 12). Science still has no clue why this is so. The large rotational variations (and tidal oscillation) of the Earth during high eccentric orbits (as is the case with our Moon) generated a “vertical” reaction force. This force, when large enough, caused a large part of the crust to crawl and deform in the latitudinal direction over extended periods.
Our rationality has profound consequences on our grasp of ancient history. Humanity, as well as the ancient sites, are much more ancient than we ever imagined.
Ancient Buildings Working as a Compass
Imagine that someone decides to build a home on the heath, in the middle of nowhere. The new home is going to be square or rectangular. What will make this person decide the orientation of this house? The Cardinals? To the Rising Sun? To the ruling wind directions? The local geography? Alternatively, something else maybe? What could this “something else” possibly be?
That is maybe not entirely relevant for an ordinary home but how would an architect orient an astronomical observatory? That is when such a question would become relevant. Most observatories’ orientations are to the cardinal directions. It is easy to understand why. How else could one “rule” the sky?
If we look at how many cities in the US are oriented built from scratch in the middle of nowhere, we see they are most of the time cardinally oriented. Any other orientation is a sort of gamble game. An almost chaotic process of stowing buildings as effectively as possible in the remaining space.
Many architects will align their project according to the Cardinals when they have enough space to do so – and some do not. There are as many reasons as there are architects, ranging from spatial planning to natural environmental factors like mountains or rivers. That is how this simple (although mathematically complex) method works – it can reveal some deeply hidden aspects of very ancient civilizations.
We Proved That Homo sapiens Build During Their Entire Presence
Most people believe that no advanced structure-building humanoids existed when Earth was in the middle of a series of ice ages spanning the past hundreds of thousands of years. How do we know that is true? Because there is no “evidence”? We want proof, not vague signs of evidence.
Let us be clear about the nature of evidence. Have we ever seen evidence that was not overthrown by other, newer pieces of evidence? When dimensions and measurements such as kilos, Newtons, meters, seconds, Joules, and so on are involved in the primary evidence, it is likely that this will be overthrown one day by other “standards” serving as evidence.
Homo sapiens is present on this planet for more than 400,000 years and has been a gifted builder directly from the start. It is the species that decides its capacities and not the conditioning institutes that we call “educational training”.
Orientation is Dimensionless
What is orientation? It is dimensionless, hence purely mathematical, and not materialistic. For example, 90° = ½π and 180° = π, and so on. With the location it is likewise; namely, we have degrees or Pi solely – and this means that there are no materialistic units attached to it. By defining ancient buildings like this, the ancient builders show us a way to an ultimate and undiscovered truth: our real history.
Once you have entirely grasped this concept, a whole new world will unfold to you!
We have found that ancient buildings, like pyramids and temples, frequently have orientations that relate to cardinal points (like a compass), mainly because we processed them in large numbers. The patterns are overwhelming, and they instantaneously prove the correlation between ancient structures and glaciation cycles. We have concluded that Glaciation cycles are caused by latitudinal crustal shifts, thereby resulting in “ice ages.”
Examples of Orientations
Why Satellite Footage is Preferred Over Field Work
We are now able to prove the age of pyramids and other such structures solely by their orientation, without digging into the ground or putting even one step on a monument. That is the difference between materialistic sensory-based science and mathematics.
How is this research done? By mass-processing the orientation and location of ancient buildings, we were able to determine the rough time frames in which specific structures are built. The correlation between orientation and age has profound importance, as you will see.
In this area of research, one decade of satellite footage has been more constructive than centuries of digging. Although it might be necessary for other scientific disciplines to dig up the foundations from under thick layers of soil, for our purposes, examining satellite footage is better than mindless digging.
Why We Need an Intersection Line
When we want to find the geodetic intersection point of the orientation of two randomly-picked structures that are non-cardinally oriented, there is a significant chance that this intersection point will not reveal anything meaningful. That is because their intersection point can be located anywhere on the globe. Such an endeavor is probably not likely to result in anything fruitful.
For example, it is easy to verify that the intersection points of the pyramids of Giza and the tomb of Ping of Han in China intersect each other on the current geographical North pole (fig. 5). We know what this means; they were intended to be oriented in this way. But what about the 85% of non-cardinally oriented structures?
Can we do the same with two structures that are oriented with a seemingly arbitrary angle? For example: can we do that with Teotihuacan and the Great Ziggurat of Ur? The intersection points of these two are 35.050N, 93.675W. What could we possibly find here? Nothing of importance as far as we can tell because there is no way even to suspect that connecting these two different structures via their intersecting lines could have something in common. Or perhaps, more importantly, we have no idea why they were “uncardinally” oriented in the first place. No archaeologist can tell you why Teotihuacan or the Great Ziggurat of Ur are oriented in their unique way.
Intersecting lines are neutral, so to speak – they represent a purely mathematical entity and have no meaning until they are correlated to each other by processing many hundreds of additional intersecting lines from other structures and then tabulating the resulting data.
How the Intersection Line is Determined
Why the North Pole Migrated Latitudinally
Some people wonder how the North pole could have migrated so seemingly perfect in the latitudinal direction along the reference line of 47.1W. It did not shift immitigable along this line. It moved in an irregular pattern along a rough latitudinal path in hundreds of thousands of years. The crust deformed in this typical way because it obeys Newton’s 2nd Law of Motion, exemplified by a spinning top reacting perpendicularly (at right angles) to its causative force. The cause is the Sun’s oscillating “pull” during high eccentric orbits. That is why the glaciation patterns and eccentricity (part of Milankovitch’s cycles) correlate perfectly with each other.
As stated, the crust did not shift equally. It was heavily deformed while Antarctica hardly moved. During this complicated deformation of earth’s skin, the North pole migrated in the latitudinal direction.
Shown below in Fig 14, you will find illustrations indicating the Poles I to VI with red dots. The size of the red dot grows with the age of each pole. The path of the pole is defined by the dimensions of the red dots, so that is not entirely a straight line, but roughly in the latitudinal direction.
The reasons for the red dots to become larger is because of the growing uncertainties of defining a pole within a specific diameter, i.e., the crust was invariably deformed due to the crustal displacements.
Orientations on Both Hemispheres are Fundamentally Different
Instantaneous Proof: No Probability of Such a Spread being Coincidental
The probability that many structures, randomly spread around the world, are oriented like this is so small that it surely is not coincidental. That is why we are 100% sure that ancient monuments were oriented to one feature that is common wherever we are on Earth: a geographic pole. That is NOT the magnetic pole, it is the spin axis of the earth. But the position of this geographic pole has changed over time. The crust appears to “rewrap” itself during high eccentric orbits, causing the geographic North pole to migrate as seen from the perspective of the crust.
The only correct conclusion is that the crust has been deformed significantly over the last 400,000 years, without geology even noticing this fact. They measured it, yes, but did not interpret it as a movement of the crust. They explained it as “glaciation cycles.” Logical maybe, when you believe the crust was rigid over the last hundreds of thousands of years.
Strangely, geologists believe in the movement of the “invisible” magnetic field. It seems more convenient to think that an invisible mass that is much greater than the crust can change directions as sudden as the weather. But it is ironic that even paleomagnetism points to movements of the crust. Until now, this discipline has been attempting to repair errors and contradictions in the conventional data but without much progress. However, when we incorporate the movements of the crust in their data, the errors suddenly become much smaller, and that adds to the mountain of proof we already have.
We have proof from different angles, and all of them are pointing to the same unbelievable truth. Not only were the biblical cataclysms very real, but it is also indisputable that in the distant past the ancient architects oriented their structures to a very different geographical pole. Our proof goes many ways – deep down into the rabbit hole.
The Origin of Homo sapiens
We are also sure that structure building humanoids, the Homo predecessor, came originally from South America, from the region of Brazil and Peru, around 800,000 years ago, and then spread Northward. We have concluded this from the orientation patterns.
We studied the orientation patterns in relation to crustal shift patterns and the most probable migration routes our ancestors took. The trends go North through Mexico, spreads over the US, and then go over a land bridge across the Bering Strait into Russia, Japan, China, and the Middle East. Land bridges were everywhere across the world at that time when the ice sheets were developing on the Northern hemisphere, causing the sea levels to be significantly lower than today.
The orientation patterns we have found in the region of Iraq, Iran, and Syria correlate with the periods mentioned in the Sumerian tablets, around 420,000 years ago. The details of what exactly happened are of course impossible to reconstruct, but indicators are pointing to a significant event in the “mutation” of Humanoid species.
Homo sapiens’ Family Tree
Collective Orientation of Contemporary Buildings
Maybe you suspect that, if we do the same kind of research regarding the orientation of contemporary buildings, we could, for some odd reason, find a collective orientation that differs from North similar to the ancient buildings. But that does not appear to be the case. The joint orientation of contemporary buildings points almost precisely towards our current geographic pole, our current cardinal system.
The more data one gathers – whether in a particular region, one country, one continent, or the whole world – the more obvious it becomes that contemporary buildings have an average collective orientation toward the geographical pole. No modern culture seems to prefer a specific direction other than a cardinal orientation.
This large-scale investigation is part of our challenge to prove that ancient buildings differ largely in orientation and that this deviation has a reason: the geographic pole was at another location back then, a very long time ago. Our mathematical model completely contradicts what contemporary history books are telling us. History is about storytelling and has nothing to do with reality.
We built a random location generator for every continent and generated a list of 392 contemporary buildings with their location and their respective orientation. When we compiled their collective orientation, they all pointed to our current geo pole within ±0.5°. This result proves that, when we add up the orientation of large numbers of independent buildings, they will always point to their geographic pole.
What is the Time Frame for These Ancient Poles?
The interpretation of this whole new view on ancient times is that, when the crust shifts (along with its pole) in the latitudinal direction, it causes a new glaciation cycle.
Most researchers, even the most controversial ones, keep sticking to a time frame of a few thousand years. They have never dared to even think in terms of hundreds of thousands of years. That is why the many ancient structures, as well as all the old myths, remain shrouded in mystery.
Our new dating method sheds an entirely different light on our history and provides an opportunity to explain most of the mysteries that no one has ever solved before. There are just too many dating mysteries around the world that scholars like to compress into less than 10,000 years, which is, according to our intense research, completely irrational. The amount of labor necessary to build all these tens of thousands of structures in a few thousand years was not present. That is another indicator that the official timelines are incorrect.
We consider a time frame of over 400,000 years without a shadow of a doubt. Our conclusions are fully backed up by large amounts of data and mathematics.
Consider the Mysteries and Start to Wonder
Which mysteries are we talking about here? You would have to continuously juggle a long, long list of mysterious sites in your mind to realize the sheer magnitude of our ancient past, such as:
- Why do we find hundreds of pyramids all around the planet?
- Why do we find thousands of dolmens all around the planet?
- What about Puma Punku, Sacsayhuaman, Teotihuacan, Göbekli Tepe? There are thousands of these ancient monuments, all over the world.
- What about the Nazca lines?
- Have we ever unanimously solved how the pyramids of Giza were built, not to talk about when and why? And if you think that you have answered one of these enigmas, stop cheering, because you have only solved a tiny fraction of the whole mystery.
- Have you ever heard of the mysterious Kailasa temple? If you have solved Giza, try to explain this one.
- What about Baalbek, Mount Shoria (Russia), Stonehenge, Carnac, Easter Island, and Yonaguni?
- How did they produce, move, and position megaliths weighing some 1000 metric tons? With the power of the mind, or with brute technology? If either of them is true, how?
- What about the underground city of Derinkuyu in Turkey? How and why was that built?
And that list is just one grain of sand in a whole mountain of sand. Keep that in mind!
To prove the correct timeline of any one of these mysteries requires more than only educated guesses and vague hypotheses. To even begin to solve these ancient enigmas requires more than hopping from one idea to the next. It requires a deep understanding of mathematics and immutable truths. With our new dating method, we have developed sufficient mathematical proof to support the claim for our enormously stretched timeline.
Why Ice Ages Were Latitudinal Crustal Deformations
The Mayan, Aztec, and Inca Cultures Are Much Older
The Mayan, Aztec, and Inca cultures are much older than scholars always told us. Why did these cultures suddenly disappear? Scholars have never found a credible explanation for the rapid disappearance of these highly developed cultures, except mythos tales, opinions, and just ideas.
For example: When scholars claim that a specific civilization abandoned a city in the 9th century AD, they are talking about the people who used the cities, not about the people who built the cities. There is quite a difference.
Because they oriented their monuments to a different older North pole, the cultures who built them must also have experienced destructive crustal shifts, throwing them back into the “stone age.” It would be challenging to survive such a catastrophe.
It appears that especially these Mayan, Aztec, and Inca root cultures are amazingly older than was always assumed. According to our research, the oldest traces go back to over 700,000 years! These cultures are the root of human civilization as we know it. The Out-of-Africa theory appears to be highly incorrect.
How the Rough Data Corresponds to the Intersection Clusters
How to Interpret Glaciations
The temperatures on Earth depend on the latitude where you are. It is crucial to understand that you can interpret a glacial period in two ways:
- The classical view: During a glaciation, the geo pole was where it currently is, so the crust endured no shifts or deformations, but the temperature changed nevertheless. Which mechanism caused this glaciation is still unexplained. Geologists who believe that the Milankovitch cycles were the cause of the ice ages are parroting unexamined beliefs. We have never seen any calculations that prove this assumption even to be correct. Earth is a sphere, and will always receive the same amount of solar energy, no matter how the sphere rotates towards the Sun. The climate will show ripples of about ±1.4°C, but these changes are caused by varying Solar activity.
- Our new view: Crustal deformation causes a glaciation cycle. Collected ice core data shows that the amount of crustal shift corresponds to the temperature change of the glaciation cycle. The crustal shift moved the cold North pole region to a warmer area and a more temperate zone to the polar region. When geologists examine the phenomenon with the assumption that the crust is rigid, they interpret their findings as a global cooling down, which never happened. The temperatures return to “normal” after a period of tens of thousands of years. A balance is again restored. This crustal “crawling” process was caused by a highly eccentric orbit of the Earth around the Sun, resulting in oscillating gravity tearing the crust slowly apart. That is why the patterns of eccentricity and glaciation match together. Crustal deformations proceed very slowly – between 15 to 35 meters average per year, depending on the rate of eccentricity. The crawling process continues over periods spanning tens of thousands of years but has a definite start and stop values. Paleomagnetic records show correlations with the crawling crust. Other evidence is indisputable: high dust concentrations in the atmosphere during the crawling process due to very heavy volcano eruptions. The geological patterns are distinct, and the mathematical proof from the orientations of ancient sites removes all doubts. Humanity fell back into a new Stone Age for a very long time.
When the crust deforms, and the North pole migrates, the temperature changes in that specific “ice age” clearly correspond with the temperature differences at the latitudes of pole locations in different time frames.
The Impact of this new Dating Method
Our methodology permits the dating of ancient cultures (pyramid builders of yore) in a more reliable manner, via the orientations of their monuments, which in turn is related to a glaciation cycle. Every glaciation cycle stands for an era. However, some structures do not match up with one of the former poles. Dating these structures requires a thorough investigation by using the path of the pole since it is possible these structures date from periods of crustal unrest. Many structures have been dated by us, as you can see summarized below.
Geologists say that every ice age is a period of an alleged cooling down. “Alleged” because the classical view dictates that the crust is rigid and cannot deform significantly over, geologically speaking, short periods. Polar ice sheets that shifted to warmer regions will cool that region, and the ice sheets will start to melt very slowly. Melting takes place throughout many thousands of years. The more moderate region that shifted to the pole now becomes cold as well. The melting energy must be provided by the two Gulf Streams that transport the heat from the equator to the icecaps (following the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics). That is why there is a warm Gulf Stream and a North Atlantic Drift running close to Greenland; they are necessary to restore energy balance.
True to the tenets of Occam’s Razor, our new methodology provides an easy-to-understand explanation for glaciation, ancient history, and crustal geology – in the simplest possible way and with the fewest assumptions.
Gathered and Analyzed Data
|Ancient Pyramids, Temples, Sites, Constructions and other monuments||900+|
|Found Orientation Clusters (Polar Nodes)||5|
Results of the Data Analyses – All in One Graph
Why did the Crust Shift in this Direction?
The most probable path of the pole is in the southerly latitudinal direction. It follows the basic principles of physics and is like the reaction of a spinning top on an external force; it reacts at 90 degrees to the direction of its rotation, and that is why the crust shifted as we propose in our hypothesis.
The dynamics, in this case, are the large tidal forces when Earth is in a high eccentric helical orbit around the Sun. The interconnectedness is further explained in our article: ”Lost Civilizations and Earth Crust Shifts.”
As we show in Fig 12, follow the highs and lows precisely the same rhythm as the distances between the Poles I to V. The probability that two independent relatively simple patterns match is quite small: 1 to 256. The likelihood that we look at a coincidental match is less than 0.4%.
But if we incorporate the natural temperature variations due to different sun activity (Fig 16), we see that the patterns match even more accurately. And for these much more complex patterns to match coincidentally is very small: 1 to 750,000. Thus we have found the most probable cause for ice ages. These were not precipitated by changes in CO2 levels but by crustal deformation cycles. CO2 is just a proxy that lags on the crustal deformation cycles.
Five Geographic Poles: Mathematically Proven
The Time Frame & Shortlist of Ancient Structures
|Pole||Pyramids, Sites, Temples|
|I: 0 – 26,000 years ago||Borobudur, Konark Sun Temple, Temple of Horus, Pyramids of Giza, Tomb of Emperor Ping of Han|
|26,000 – 130,000||Period of crustal deformation: Pole II to Pole I|
|II: 130,000 – 155,000 years ago||Babylon, Prasat Phum Prasat, Uxmal (Pyramid of the magician), El Mirador, Ka’ba-ye Zartosht|
|155,000 – 210,000||Period of crustal deformation: Pole III to Pole II|
|III: 210,000 – 225,000 years ago||Teotihuacan, Pompeii (temples), Carnac, Edzna, Tomb of Emperor Zhao of Han, Antipatris|
|225,000 – 240,000||Period of crustal deformation: Pole IV to Pole III|
|IV: 240,000 – 270,000 years ago||Yagul, Kuara (Sumer), Great Kyz Kala, El Castillo (Chichen Itza), Pyramid of Koh-Ker|
|270,000 – 330,000||Period of crustal deformation: Pole V to Pole IV|
|V: 330,000 – 345,000 years ago||Tomb of Three Kings of Zhou, Der (Sumer), Nohoch Mul pyramid (Cobá), Caral, Madinet Habu temple, Borsippa (Sumer)|
|345,000 – 410,000||Period of crustal deformation: Pole VI to Pole V|
|VI: 410,000 – 440,000 years ago||Nineveh (Sumer), Sippar (Sumer), Eridu (Sumer), Pyramids of Cochasqui (No. 5, 9, 14), Huaca del Sol, Zabala (Sumer), Caral|
Why Ice Ages Were Earth Crust Deformations
About the Average Temperature Gradient
Important to note is that the average temperature gradient of 0.576°C per degree latitude that you find in Fig 15 is calculated based on the surface area to which the specific temperature belongs. For example, at the poles, it is very cold, but the surface areas of the poles are tiny compared to that of the equator. Hence, the poles are not significantly contributing to the so-called ΔT, the temperature differences.
The reason why these temperature gradients are used this way in our research is that the temperature reconstructions from the ice cores use a similar method. Here we transform the data from the ice cores, and we recalculate them into a latitudinal deformation of the crust.
When we subtract the natural temperature variations, 2.8°C, from the most significant peaks and valleys in the ice age graphs, we find the remaining crustal deformations of the last significant events. In all cases, they are matching with temperature gradients between two adjacent subsequent poles. The chance for such a match to occur coincidentally in such a complicated set of patterns is 1 to 750,000. We are sure we have found the correct time frame.
The Crust is More Dynamic Than Often Believed
We have processed a large amount of data to calculate and prove the position of the former poles, and to calculate the reliability of this new theory.
It is crucial to realize that Antarctica hardly moved its position at the South pole, while Greenland raced over the North pole. When we look at the Pacific, we are looking at an almost uninterrupted plate that was stretched due to the deformations. That is the reason why there is no longer a continent in the Pacific. Australia was ripped off from Antarctica. Zealandia became submerged in the massive stretch movement.
When we look at the other side of the globe, it seems as if the opposite occurred. A massive compression took place from North to South, and a spreading from East to West. Hence a resulting movement of Greenland over the pole towards the equator. The timescale of these large deformations is much shorter than geologists ever realized. Yes, there are tectonic forces and the tectonic plates move towards each other or away from each other. But there is another force present that geologists have never recognized.
The Earth is much more dynamic than we ever thought. Our book (in progress) deals extensively with this subject because, although crucial, it is hard to grasp.
Our Data Shows how the Motion Mechanics of the Crust Works
The orientation of the foundations of ancient buildings, mainly because we processed them in large numbers, gave us profound insights into ancient times.
Ice age graphs correspond to the eccentricity of Earth’s orbit over the last 800,000 years. The chance for these two graphs to correspond to each other coincidentally is 0.00069% or 1 to 145,000. It shows that we must look at eccentricity for the root cause of ice ages and nowhere else. It is weird to notice that geology consequently overlooked this.
When we dive into the motion mechanics of large celestial objects, we see mainly two things happening:
- Eccentricity causes variations in the rate of rotation of the minor object (in this case the Earth). The inner parts of the Earth are much denser than the crust. Hence they will react less intensely to tidal forces of the Sun.
- Tidal forces vary annually (in case of Earth). The more significant the eccentricity, the larger the tidal variations. At perihelion, the Sun “pulls” hardest on Earth, almost egg-shaping the Earth. At aphelion, the Sun “pulls” less on the Earth. At an eccentricity of between 0.03 and 0.05, these annual forces can vary up to about 26%, putting the Earth’s different layers under varying amounts of stress.
From this we can quite easily understand what happens: a corresponding latitudinal reaction force is born. Compare it with a spinning top that reacts perpendicular to an external force applied to it. This reaction force drives the lightest and outer part of the Earth, the crust, to crawl perpendicularly to the sense of rotation during high eccentric orbital periods around the Sun.
The data indicate with a very high degree of certainty that former poles, namely former poles II, III, and IV existed on Greenland during the most recent ice ages. The crust has continued to deform not just slightly; it moved significantly. The North pole moved 38 degrees of latitude over the last 330,000 years (from pole IV to the present pole) — the crust ticks like a clock on eccentricity.
The Moving Crust Turns Everything Upside Down
The whole crust in the region of Greenland was heavily deformed – leaving Antarctica surprisingly stable at its current position – and Greenland moved over the geographic North pole between 330,000 and 110,000 years ago in two shifts, meaning that Greenland has three former geo pole locations. To illustrate: This is like three fence posts having two spaces between posts. The Greenland ice sheet is a result of this era, and that is why it is so densely covered with ice and is melting now.
Earth crust shifts do not happen overnight. They are slow, unstoppable processes that take place over extended periods. The most violent, swift crustal shifts took place throughout about 15,000 years, and the slowest ones happened throughout about 100,000 years. However, it is a period of constant turmoil, megaquakes, sloshing oceans, volcano eruptions, tsunamis, and a changing climate due to the shifting latitude and sliding earth crusts. Sea levels have changed repeatedly over many tens of thousands of years and will again fall or rise depending on the position of new geographic poles. Whether the pole is in the ocean or on land makes a world of difference in the formation of ice sheets.
An Earth crust shift is not the spectacular event that many people think it is. It is a massive, slow, environmentally disruptive, mighty deformation process of the crust, which forced many of the ancient peoples to migrate to safer places. It also caused massive extinctions of the Human population which we now call “lost civilizations.” The reasons for these massive changes have been right under our noses, and we collectively fail to recognize them.
The Probability that These Facts are True
The probability that temperature changes during the last ice ages accidentally correspond to our found mathematical hot spots is 1 to 746,496 or 0.000134%. It is therefore for more than 99.99987% sure that the following facts are real:
- The geographic North pole migrated in the latitudinal direction, while parts of the crust were massively deformed. Many traditions around the world describe these events as deluges and global catastrophes.
- Antarctica remained (almost) stable at its current position. Migration of the geographic North pole leaves proxy marks behind in the ice sheets of a stable and steady South pole. Both poles are equally sensitive to changes. That is the reason why the movements of the agile North pole are accurately registered in the ice layers of the stable South pole.
- The shifts of the North pole relate to “ice ages” in the exact order and magnitude as they are registered in the ice sheet of Antarctica.
- Ancient structures are oriented to these former geo North poles. The age of the ancient structures is in most cases as old as the pole.
- A high eccentric orbit around the Sun is the cause of crustal deformation in combination with expansion zones as we have described in this article;
- Greenland’s ice sheet was formed by being repeatedly found at different successive North pole locations, and that its massive ice sheet will eventually melt because it has moved to a place of ‘moderate’ temperatures;
- CO2 lags on temperature changes and is therefore not the (primary) cause of temperature changes.
Antiquity Reborn – a Scientific Battlefield
Our new mathematical crustal displacement hypothesis will eventually prevail and change the way science looks at our history. It will take many decades to come to persuade them to accept the truth of what happened with the Earth’s crust. It will also have a profound impact on the current climate models once the method is validated and recognized by the mainstream “gate-keepers” as real and valid.
Of course, it will probably take many decades for this theory to mature. Much energy is being expended in the development of our theory, and we make rapid progress. Increasing numbers of knowledgeable scientists are surprised and amazed by our new dating theory – the genie is out of the bottle.
One example of the many profound implications this theory has: how much chance is there that paleomagnetism, which is a highly technical and well-funded discipline, develops a correct and valid theory anytime soon? Not very much – but why is that? Because mainstream Geology stubbornly ignores and dismisses the possibility of a slow latitudinal crawling crust during high eccentric orbits of the Earth around the Sun.
Crustal movements would also leave traces in the magnetizable sediments, and in fact, destroy the patterns that geologists hoped to obtain. That is why this discipline has never come to one overall acceptable view of the movements of the magnetic pole. There is no way to recognize from the samples alone what has moved: the core, the crust or both. Because of the magnetic core moves, it is therefore not the only variable that left traces.
Antiquity Reborn – Our Book
Our book, which is currently in the making under the working title “Antiquity Reborn,” will turn many generally accepted paradigms into dust; not by swinging words of accusation at anyone, but by using mathematics in a way most people will understand and accept as valid.
Aside from all the proof necessary to show what happened in the distant past, our book will provide a framework to develop a new look at lost civilizations, and what happened to them. It will also help us understand who we are and what our roots are. It will solve many mysteries and unite many scientific disciplines while probably raising many new questions at the same time.
© 2015 – 2019 by Mario Buildreps et al.
Proofreading and editing: J.B. (updated January 2019)