How Old is Göbekli Tepe Really?

Many of the people who land on this website are interested in Göbekli Tepe or any other ancient site. You are probably already questioning the mainstream ideas about history. And that has a reason: there are too many ancient mysteries left unexplained. Somewhere in your unconscious you know the official versions are incorrect. But what is the correct version then?

If you’ve carefully read the articles on this website, you’ll know the true history of Humanity, and how it expands over hundreds of thousands of years all over the globe. The official version of history has been compressed with a factor of 50 to what it is today. It is said of Göbekli Tepe it is one of the oldest man made temple complex on Earth.

If you want to know how old Göbekli Tepe is according to the mainstream publications, you can visit Wikipedia or any other mainstream source. Is Göbekli Tepe really some 12,000 years old? No, it is not. I will show you.

Logos or Mythos?

If you like to label Göbekli Tepe with fancy words like “early Neolithic sanctuary” in order to address the alleged age of Göbekli Tepe, you’ve probably not much affection with mathematics and numbers . These kinds of labels are meaningless, suggesting that the user is an expert on his field.

Most of these experts are unable to dig any deeper than poor attempts to label their world where they live in, without really seeing what it is where they’re surrounded with. Because this website only deals with numbers and mathematics it is able to explain our history much more accurately, and I can tell you it deviates awesomely from what you’ve learned. Throw away everything you’ve learned about history!

What will it be for you? Truth or falsehood? Logos versus Mythos?

Fig 1: Göbekli Tepe was covered with many feet of soil. Stratigraphy records of this region show the soil builds up only 5 to 6 feet every 100,000 years. How old would Göbekli Tepe be then? What does this tell us about the used dating techniques and the established ideas? That they’re in fact misleading us. Only the Logos will set you free.

How Old is Göbekli Tepe Really?

Göbekli Tepe’s age spans over a period of more than 250,000 years. Some of the readers will now say: “oh, that’s impossible!” Is it? There are major indicators, mathematical truths, which leads to this inevitable conclusion. These indicators dwarf any other so called “evidence” which is gathered at the local scene.

Archaeology will of course not agree with this conclusion, but that’s because archaeology is, because of its frozen paradigm, an irrational discipline, unable to deal with the facts as they really are. Archaeology, as it is practiced by the established academia, has nothing to do with real science. It is nothing more than a believe system to keep the existing paradigm intact.

How is it possible I came to this conclusion? Please, follow me on this tour.

There’s No Significant Difference in Level Between Roman Buildings and New Buildings

Fig 2: This Roman temple in Kroatia (on the left) from which it is said it’s about 2,000 years old lies at the same ground level as the surrounding contemporary buildings (right and behind). Why isn’t this building lying much deeper? Because chronostratigraphy says about this region that the natural rate in which ground layers build up is very slowly, only 0.1 feet (1.2″) per 2,000 years. That’s why it is at equal level!
Fig 3: Another example of an ancient Roman temple in France. There’s also no difference in levels between the temple and the contemporary surrounding buildings.

Roman Buildings Are at the Same Ground Level

When we look to the many buildings in ancient Rome or to the many ancient Roman settlements around Europe, we see that the levels of ancient Roman buildings and contemporary buildings do not differ significantly or none at all. That raises the question: why is it then Göbekli Tepe was covered under many feet of soil?

Archaeologists argue that Göbekli Tepe had a ‘roof which collapsed’ in order to explain the thick amount of soil in which the site was covered. That argument doesn’t explain why it’s lying deeper as the surrounding area. The only rational explanation is a very old age.

What many people easily swallow is the argument that Göbekli Tepe is much older than the Roman temples. According to the archaeologists is Göbekli Tepe about 6 times older as the Roman temples. Many people have nothing with large numbers, like one thousand years, or 12,000 years, let alone 250,000 years. It all exceeds the time frame of the mortal ego many folds.

But if we follow the chronostratigraphy of that region, Göbekli Tepe would, if it is really 12,000 years old, be covered with just about 7 to 8 inches of soil. The site would still be in plain sight, possibly covered with some vegetation.

Fig 4: Why is this ancient arena in Arles at the same level as the rest of the city? Why didn’t its immense weight not push the colossal structure many feet beneath the contemporary ground level? Because it is “only” 2,000 years old, and the difference in level is only 1 to 2 inches.

How Deep Did They Have to Dig for Göbekli Tepe?

That’s probably the first question no one ever asked before. As a general rule counts: the deeper something lies, the older it is. The depth on which a site can be found depends on the rate of which the ground layers are built up over time.

If the depth on which a site has to dug up is about 15 feet below the current ground level, and none of the Roman temples had ever to be dug up, how old would it be?

If this first simple question still don’t raise your eyebrows, you might need a serious paradigm shift.

Chronostratigraphy gives some of the first indications of its true age.

What is Chronostratigraphy?

Chronostratigraphy is the study of the age of ground layers. It attempts to label an age to a certain ground layer. The rate in which ground layers build up can vary depending in which region you are.

The common rate in which ground layers build up in a typical region like Southeast Turkey where Göbekli Tepe is situated is around 5 to 6 feet of dense soil per 100,000 years. That indicates that Göbekli Tepe is somewhere between 150,000 to 250,000 years old. Are there other indicators that point to a similar age? Yes, there are.

 

Fig 5: This chronostratigraphy graph shows the rate in which soil layers build up in Southeast Europe (Italy) over a long period of time. It takes about 100,000 years to build up 5 to 6 feet (1.5 to 1.8 m) of dense compressed soil.

First Rough Indications of Göbekli Tepe’s True Age

The original ground level of Göbekli Tepe varies between 10 to 15 feet beneath the current ground level. All this sand, rocks, and soil that the archaeologists had to dig away came there in a natural way. That takes an enormous amount of time, between 150,000 to 250,000 years, depending to which part of the construction you’re looking at.

It is said by archaeologists that Göbekli Tepe is some 12,000 years old, but there’s in fact not a single fact that will support this claim, other than associative and assumptive evidence gathered at the local scene.

Göbekli Tepe was also never covered with a kind of roof. That’s an unavoidable belief because the site is hundreds of thousands of years old. The alleged roof which must have collapsed is made up by archaeologists because that much soil cannot build up in just a few thousand years. The surrounding area is also at a similar higher level, hence debunking the belief that Göbekli Tepe had a roof. Otherwise the rest of Turkey had a roof as well! And it all collapsed!

Göbekli Tepe was a calender which served to measure the time of the year. It was an open air construction to measure the seasons, and every construction was once oriented to another geographic pole. The proof is in the numbers.

Fig 6: There are still people who believe that the Mayan culture was not more than 2,500 years old. But the stratigraphy records show that the guy standing at the bottom looks at records of 650,000 years old. A conditioned mind is unable to grasp a single bit of it.

A False Narrative

Each separate construction of Göbekli Tepe belongs to a different time frame, which I will show you further on. These time frames are many tens of thousands of years apart.

Archaeologists want you to believe it was all built in the same period. It’s all wrong, and part of the big bamboozle. The people who run these sciences want you to believe there’s no sophisticated culture beyond some 12,000 years ago.

Once you understand how the science community really works, you’ll understand how important these dogmas are. It imprisons you into the false narrative of natural evolution from primitive to sophisticated, while in fact we are creations of genetic manipulation, and thus ultimately slaves of a system.

We were once a free species, free from genetic modifications, free to roam the Earth.

Göbekli Tepe’s Original Ground Level

Fig 7: Göbekli Tepe looked originally like on this artist impression. It had to be uncovered of many feet of naturally deposited soil. That is the first sign of an age of several hundreds of thousands of years.

Orientation of the Large T-shaped Pillars

Fig 8: This map shows how the major T-shaped stones are oriented. Because these orientations matches 3 out of 4 with the already proven former geo poles, we can calculate the probabilty of these orientations to be coincidental.

The map on the right shows how the four constructions are oriented. All four constructions are differently oriented and all constructions are negatively oriented in regard of our current geographic North pole.

Archaeologists never paid attention to the negative orientation of the site. The question why the site is not oriented to our current North pole has never been answered. To where would the site be oriented? And why would it be oriented so oddly and so differently from each other?

Why aren’t the large T-shaped pillars not oriented towards the solstices? No one knows the answer, except some wild guesses that have not a single rational basis.

The answer is that the site of Göbekli Tepe is reoriented after every crustal displacement. Every crustal displacement resulted into another geographic pole position. This process spans over a period of more than 150,000 years

Because the crust (and so the geographic poles) has moved is Göbekli Tepe reoriented in regard to the geographic pole. How large are the odds for this claim to be actually true?

We have seen that the stratigraphy records are pointing to an age of around 250,000 years. Can we reinforce this age with other evidence or even proof?

How the Large T-shapes Pillars Correlate to Ancient Geo Poles

Fig 9: Göbekli Tepe correlates with 3 former geo pole locations. The odds for this pattern to be coincidental is very small. Because the odds are so small we have very clear evidence for its true age and the reason why the site has been reoriented after major crustal displacements.
Göbekli Tepe Relates to: Probability for this correlation to be coincidental: Age of the Pole (Kyrs)*:
Pole I 0 – 30
Pole II 1.67% 130 – 180
Pole III 2.22% 220 – 230
Pole IV 2.78% 240 – 270
Pole V 330 – 360
Combined Probability 0.00103% or 1 to 97,100

*Latest data, they may differ from earlier publications. The periods in between the stable pole positions are crustal displacements.

The results

The results of this research are clear:

  • the stratigraphic records point to an age of 250,000 years for the oldest deepest constructions. This age correlates with the (re)orientation patterns of the site. This relation alone is very small to be just coincidental, which is not taken into consideration in the probability calculations.
  • the orientation patterns reveal more subtle ages of between 250,000 and 100,000 years,
  • the certainty of the claim for Göbekli Tepe to be older than 100,000 years is 99.999%,
  • it is for 99.999% certain that Göbekli Tepe has been reoriented due to crustal displacements,
  • the part of Göbekli Tepe marked as “D” (fig. 8) and is oriented between Pole II and Pole I has been built during the shifting crust, and became obsolete after a few millenniums,
  • none of the calenders are oriented to our current geographic North pole, because the site was abandoned between 110,000 and 80,000 years ago.

There’s nothing in and around the site that’s pointing to an age of just 12,000 years. This age is nothing more than a wild guess in the dark, and based on complete unscientific methods.

If you have to dig for ruins many feet below the current ground level, your alarm bells should go off. Check out the chronostratigraphy records of your region first to get a first indication how the soil builds up over time.

If you have the opportunity to use a ground radar, work from rough to fine. You can scan the contours of the structure and find out how it is oriented in regard to our current geographic pole. If it relates to one of the ancient poles (which you can find on this website) and you find a similar match in the stratigraphy records, you’ve already a 1 to 10,000 hit they match up coincidentally. You’ve found its most probable age.

 

© 2017 by Mario Buildreps

Anunnaki – Where Did ENKI Go To?

According to the Sumerian Tablets came the Anunnaki to Earth some 440,000 years ago to look for gold. After their installment in Sumer, which is nowadays the region of Iraq and Iran, they built a vast empire around the world. The Tablets speak of Enki to travel South, which has been interpreted as him traveling to South-Africa. Logically when there is not a single clue about Earth’s true geological history, and how it looked like between 400,000 and 500,000 years ago.

South seen from Sumer (Iraq) was back then a whole different direction then it is today, and so are all interpretations, even the most controversial ones, looking into the wrong direction.

Learn where Enki really went and understand why this whole region is what it is today. Only then you will understand where the knowledge came from. If you want to descent into the rabbit hole, make sure you go into the right direction.

 

https://patreon.com/buildreps

© 2017 by Mario Buildreps

 

Pyramids of China – Why Our History Has Been Falsified

Who built the pyramids of China? Historians and Archaeologists tell us it were the emperors who lived somewhere between 500 BC and 1000 AD. That story appears to be a lie.

The mathematical keys which are found on a global scale show with certainties up to 99.999% that the orientation patterns of the Chinese pyramids are in accordance with the theory or method – meaning their ages range between 350,000 years down to a dozen millenniums old.

None of these pyramids were built by some emperor. The historical tales were bent by the ones who ruled, just as Mao Zedong did during the revolution.

The Chinese pyramids are aligned to the same geographical poles as pyramids and temples in Egypt, Belize, Mexico, Israel, Iran, Iraq, Pakistan, Guatemala. The odds for these patterns to be coincidental are so small we can be sure we have found the ultimate mathematical proof that ancient civilizations were scattered and decimated by earth crust displacements.

The Chinese culture belongs to what some have labeled as a lost civilization with a very long history of more than 300,000 years of peaks and valleys. The Chinese medical knowledge of acupuncture has probably its roots in this lost civilization of hundreds of millenniums ago which was given to us by “the gods from the sky” – the Anunnaki.

They became what we now call lost civilizations, but their structures are still in plain sight. That historians and archaeologists tell us something else can now be labeled as mythological nonsense. The mathematical facts tell us something else.

This short video is made to show a tiny part of the theory. You can read the big article on the main page to get a full grip on the theory or method. Enjoy watching!

 

© 2017 by Mario Buildreps

 

Earth Crust Displacements is What Caused Ice Ages

Hapgood was right, Earth Crust Displacements is what caused Ice Ages. Hapgood was wrong about the causative force, but was definitely right about the phenomenon itself. Hapgood was also wrong in the direction of the displacements, they went solely in the latitudinal direction, and not longitudinal like Hapgood believed. That’s because Earth behaves like a spinning top that reacts perpendicular to the oscillating pull of the Sun when the Earth is in high eccentric orbit. The eccentricity of orbit fits perfectly on the glaciation graphs, something where many scientists have wondered about but still don’t understand why that is.

https://patreon.com/buildreps

© 2017 Mario Buildreps

Secret of Pyramids Around the World SOLVED!

This short video shows how ancient history has to be explained. The orientation patterns of pyramids, temples and sites around the world reveal seamlessly how they are related to the ice ages.

The true age of stone structures spread around the world is not just a few thousand years, no, these structures cover a period of between several millenniums up to almost 500,000 years. Our history has been compressed with a factor of about 50 times, and on top of that are facts twisted and changed.

The Roman empire, followed by the Catholic empire destroyed very effectively the remains and historical evidence of lost civilizations. The reason why this has been done? To get control over a fast growing population.

If you don’t know where you came from, you don’t know where you’re going to. If you live in the perception that your ancestry, and so ultimately you, came from primitive barbarians you’re more willing to accept the kind of system we’re currently living in. Our ancestors were much higher developed both spiritually and intellectually than your conditioning makes you believe.

You must develop a perception on your origin to cast of your chains, and the only way to do that is to use advanced mathematics to explain our real origin and our real history.

© Mario Buildreps 2017

Lost Civilizations: Stonehenge – True Age Revealed (Part V)

Stonehenge is about 50 times older than claimed by historians and archaeologists. The age is way of the charts. The research is not done by mindless digging, but by using mathematics, and mathematics alone. History is not what it seems – it is much more awesome and odder than historians want you to believe.

If you want to know more about Stonehenge’s real use: join the research!

 

© Mario Buildreps 2017

Lost Civilizations: El Caracol, the Ancient Observatory (Part IV)

El Caracol, the ancient observatory of Chichen Itza, was used to observe the solstices and the equinoxes. Because the crust is displaced, the observatory is out of line and that’s it why it doesn’t work anymore. Because science hasn’t worked out yet what happened in the ancient past, the observatory is interpreted in a completely wrong way. This video explains how the observatory was used. The building is 284,000 years old, and was built in several stages to adapt it to the changed geo pole position.

The film will explain you bit by bit how this observatory was operated over a period of tens of thousands of years. The proof is in the numbers, and needs little further explanation.

The burden of proof is on the shoulders of a wide range of scholars and scientists to find an explanation. Our history appears to be a fraud on a colossal scale.

 

© 2017 by Buildreps

Lost Civilizations: Mayan City of Chichen Itza [TRAILER]

El Castillo, officially called the Pyramid of Kukulkan, is approximately 250,000 years old. That counts for large parts of the site. Some pyramids correlate with other poles, like Pole II and Pole III (Teotihuacan). These pyramids are younger, but still much older than assumed by mainstream science. The certainties of this claim are higher than 99.99%. The pyramid of Kukulkan hides two other pyramids underneath which are all similarly oriented. The pyramid of Kukulkan was once oriented to the cardinals and thus to the equinox. It produced a quite similar effect as it produces today during the equinox, but that effect was produced during the Summer and Winter solstices. During the solstices the pyramid produced the effect that so many people are watching during the equinox, but that contemporary event is a false event. The real event is still approximately 1° off from the original event. The event only occurred during the solstices. During the equinox it produced a magnificent grazing light along both the North and South side of the pyramid.

The ancient observatory on Chichen Itza, called El Caracol, contains all the clues to unravel the mysteries of this very ancient Mayan city. The key to understand the city is hidden in advanced mathematics. The angle between both Winter and Summer solstices depends on the latitude of the observer. All keys are there in this observatory, unlocking an amazing ancient history. The method or theory is put into practice on many other sites which will also be published the coming months.

© 2017 by Mario Buildreps

New Pyramid Found in Egypt?

The Nabta Playa Calendar Circle was oriented to the Equinox between 240,000 and 270,000 years ago. It is that old! It was used to measure both the Winter and Summer solstices. It is now unusable because the crust has shifted a few times.

Prediction of a New Unearthed Massive Structure in Egypt

Finding ancient, yet unearthed structures is like finding undiscovered planets; we can do this by using mathematics. The new theory predicts an unearthed structure in Egypt close to Nabta playa.

The probability there won’t be a yet unearthed structure is: 0.021% or 1 to 4,765. There is still a chance, although small, it’s a mare’s nest. The unearthed structure shares the same geographic pole as Teotihuacan. It was probably a pyramid, but that has to be verified at the location itself.

The Contours of This Structure

The contours of a square structure are visible. The orientation is measurable and correlates to Teotihuacan.

Same Base as Khufu and Teotihuacan

The size of the base of this unknown structure is equal to the base of the Great Pyramid of Khufu and that of Teotihuacan. It is probably destroyed long time ago or maybe it was never finished, but the contours of the foundations seem to be clearly present.

Because the size of the base is similar to that of the other two big pyramids makes it even more likely it is/was a pyramid.

The highlights:

  • the structure has the same orientation (±1°) as the Nabta Playa Calendar Circle,
  • the structure is oriented to the same former geo pole as Teotihuacan,
  • the structure has the same base size as Teotihuacan and Khufu,
  • the contours of the structure are too square to be coincidental.

When we add up all these facts the odds are very good we have found something new.

Examples of Other Very Ancient Structural Contours

Six examples of ancient contours of ancient structures. Most of them are destroyed, yet in many cases remain the contours of the foundations visible.

A New Player in the Game

This unearthed pyramid is approximately of the same age as the Nabta Playa Calendar Circle: between 240,000 and 270,000 years. I know, that is way off the map of historians.

It’s not a theory stitched together by mythos stories like historians and Egyptologists like to do, it’s a mathematical theory that covers most of the known ancient structures all around the globe. A brand new powerful player in the game.

If you know nothing about the theory that predicts this unearthed “pyramid”, you can read the articles on this website. There is a book in the making about this theory; it turns history upside down as we know it. It won’t be very popular among the mainstreamers, like historians who believe in Mythos stories and have no idea what the Logos is about.

Other Yet Unearthed Structures

Examples of other yet unearthed structures (foundations) in Mexico. The probability these are NOT foundations of ancient structures is 1 to 770 billion. The location is deliberately not yet published.

Who Takes the Challenge?

The chances for two independent objects to share exactly the same orientation pattern are low. To share their orientation with a mathematical proven geographic pole is even lower. And finally, to have a base of the same size as Khufu’s pyramid makes it even more probable it’s an ancient structure of that same size. But it has been destroyed or was never finished.

Archaeologists, take your shovels with you and go find it in the desert of Southern Egypt! The location is given at the bottom of this article. Who takes the challenge?

If there is something there, it shows that the theory is able to predict and therefore most probably correct. But that will turn so much upside down, that we are not assured that historians, scholars, governments, archaeologists, and so on will cheat on the game. They have been caught cheating before. Why has the Vatican a secret archive? Because it contains secrets that can not bear the light of day.

If there are tips and tricks to overcome this problem, please leave a comment below with your suggestion(s).

The Nabta Playa Calendar Circle is Oriented to Geo Pole III

The Nabta Playa Calendar Circle deviates just one degree from the square contours you see below. The calender circle was oriented to the equinox between 240,000 and 270,000 years ago and meant to allocate Winter and Summer solstice.

Specifications

Item
Location
22.5335N, 30.6995E
Dimensions
225m
Orientation
-22° (or 338°)
Estimated age
240,000 – 270,000 years

Size and Orientation of the Foundation

 

The contours of the “hill” are oriented in the same direction as the Nabta Playa Calendar Circle, it is square shaped, and has almost the same dimensions as Khufu’s pyramid.
 
© 2016 by Buildreps

Why Stonehenge is 263,000 Years Old

Stonehenge is one of the most famous archaeological remains of our ancient ancestors. There are many speculations about the use and the age of Stonehenge. There are new discoveries, mathematical discoveries that undoubtedly reveal the true age of Stonehenge.
Stonehenge at sunset. This beautiful photograph reflects the essence of this structure very well. It relates to the sun, but not in the way most people think.

About Stonehenge

Stonehenge is without much doubt, together with the Pyramids of Giza, one of the most intriguing ancient monuments on Earth.

There are many other mysterious structures around the world, most of which are categorized somewhere between 1,500 and 10,000 years old. Quite a narrow time frame for such a huge amount of ancient structures built by a limited population that on top of that was believed to struggle for survival. That is illogical.

Transportation of Bluestones

Almost everyone agrees that the long-distance transport of the Bluestones from Wales to Stonehenge was one of the most remarkable accomplishments of a society of about 5,000 years ago. It is said they had no wheels, and that was a serious problem when they had to transport very heavy stones.

It is also said that life was tough and that men were occupied with survival by hunting beasts. If that would be true, why were they then so busy dragging around massive stones? The stories and believes around ancient humanities are illogical and full of contradictions.

The biggest of Stonehenge’s stones, known as Sarsens, are up to 9 meters tall and weigh almost 25 metric tons. It is widely believed that they were brought from Marlborough Downs, a distance of 32 kilometers to the north. Why so much effort?

How Old is Stonehenge Really?

Scientists overthrow each others theories with newer versions. That happens with Stonehenge too. Stonehenge will appear to be older with every new discovery. What did that say about the believes before that new discovery? That they were based on falsehood. How about the new discovery, that somewhat pushed the limits of the ruling paradigm? How will the odds be it’s still false? I’ll tell you: 100%.

Archaeologists are literally guessing, while making associative and assumptive relations between artefacts found in and around Stonehenge. Nothing is verified, while they believe they have.  On top of that are these artefacts dated by using the highly unreliable radiocarbon dating called 14C.

Stonehenge is 263,000 years old. Verified. 99,9986% certain.

Stonehenge Was Oriented to an Ancient Sun Rise

Stonehenge is for such a structure seemingly illogical oriented. It was oriented to an ancient North pole. From that we can derive its true antiquity, but that is a mathematical quest.

Most Important Contemporary Structures Are Oriented to True North

Just check out yourself how many important buildings are oriented to the geographic North pole (or the sun, which is in fact the same).

Buildings that express power:

  • White House in Washington,
  • Supreme Court in Washington,
  • The Vatican in Rome,
  • The Royal Palace in Amsterdam,
  • Forbidden Palace in Beijing,
  • Taj Mahal in Agra,
  • Palais du Luxembourg in Paris,
  • Pyramids of Giza in Cairo,
  • Borobudur on Java.

Many football and socker ‘temples’ are oriented to the geo pole. Many university ‘temples’ are North-South oriented. Many American cities are North-South oriented.

When there’s plenty of space, positioning like this is the only logical thing to do. When there’s not enough space, such as the Vatican, it’s an ultimate expression of power, for it takes more money to orient a structure cardinally in a crowded city, and not to adapt it to available spatial possibilities.

There are many examples that seemingly refute the statement that important buildings are pointed to the geo pole, but that’s always the case in city centers. There wasn’t enough space to twist it to the geo pole. Otherwise it would have been done this way. Most architects have the desire to orient to the cardinals.

When sunrise and sunset somehow play an important role, every building will be oriented to one of the geographic poles, depending on which hemisphere you find yourself. In any other case it’s fitted into the city’s space or adjusted to the local natural environment.

Where the Former Geo Poles Were Located

The former geo poles are mathematically derived from 500 orientation clusters of pyramids and temples which were randomly spread around the world. The slight misalignment of Stonehenge nowadays is caused by the crustal deformations after three major shifting events. 

Time Frame for Stonehenge

The time frame where Stonehenge is referring to is between 240,000 and 270,000 years ago.

The probability that the pole was at that location is very certain: 99.9986%. When it was there is for 99.99986% certain. This new method of dating is a powerful, new player in the game. While archaeologists are still mindlessly digging, and historians keep mindlessly repeating their textbooks, the way we can date ancient structures has been changed radically.

Why to Orient Stonehenge to the Geographical North Pole

It makes no sense to built a structure like Stonehenge in the middle of nowhere with so much effort, and orient it just to nowhere. It is said Stonehenge was oriented to the Summer solstice. For that you need only two stones. Why, how and what for were all the other stones used? If Stonehenge is twisted under the right orientation and put on the right latitude, you see jaw dropping things happen – the device suddenly starts to work! And you’ll understand how and what for it was used.

Because it was oriented to an ancient geographic North pole, the builders were able to measure the Summer solstice, the equinox, and the Winter solstice. Stonehenge was an instrument. They could measure sky phenomena, like the movement of the Pole star, and the movements of the Moon as well.

But Stonehenge has become completely useless due to the displacement of the crust and therefore the geo pole. What a disappointment, hey!

Probability of This Orientation

There’s about 18% chance that the orientation of Stonehenge ‘hits’ exactly one of the four former poles. That means that there is 82% chance that Stonehenge was meant to be oriented to this former North pole, which was two glaciation cycles ago.

When we rationalize all aspects of Stonehenge the odds it was NOT oriented to this ancient pole exceeds the 1 to 500,000. But since that probability can logically not exceed the probability of the pole position (Pole IV), it has been downsized to 1 to 69,219 which equals a 99.9986% certainty, which is the verified certainty of the position of Pole IV.

Have you ever seen archaeologists keeping their claims under scrutiny in a way we can judge? No, never. Archaeologists are in fact graduated pit diggers, who have claimed the territory of history as their own. That’s maybe why we cannot expect them to fully rationalize what they are doing.

There is just 19% chance that Stonehenge was meant to be oriented to one of the solstices. And let’s be rational. The current orientation of Stonehenge measures only one solstice. Where were all other rocks used for then? All astronomical objects are cardinally oriented. But that was a whole other cardinal system than we know today, since the crust starts to crawl when Earth is in a high eccentric orbit around the Sun.

When we value all variables there’s just 0.0014% chance that Stonehenge was NOT oriented to Pole IV. By rationalizing the whole site of Stonehenge we’ve been able to pinpoint its exact age at 263,000 years.

More details about Stonehenge will be published in the future.

 

 

© 2016, 2017 by Buildreps

True Age of El Castillo on Chichen Itza

El Castillo (Kukulcan) is the towering icon of Chichen Itza. Just recently an older pyramid was discovered underneath El Castillo. The pyramids seem to be criss-cross oriented. But is that so?

The pyramids and buildings on Chichen Itza are seemingly criss-cross oriented. What can they tell us about the past? | © 2016 Buildreps

What is Chichen Itza?

Chichen Itza is said to be one of the most important Mayan cities. The site is located on the Yucatán Peninsula in Mexico. The Pyramid of Kukulcan, also called El Castillo, is the towering icon of Chichen Itza. The whole site is registered on the UNESCO World Heritage list.

It is believed the city was built by the Mayans around 600 AD. Recent excavations show there are structures underneath the current ground level, implying that the site could be much older than always thought.

In former articles is shown how a large collection of pyramids and ancient temples (about 500) around the world reveal the locations of former geo poles. The used method is purely mathematical, and it reveals the locations of former geo poles with certainties of more than 99.99%. It is crucial to grasp this concept to understand this article.

Chichen Itza has a collection of pyramids and buildings that are seemingly criss-cross oriented. Why is the site so chaotic organised? What prevented the builders to built a logical, cardinally oriented city?

When pyramids would be oriented to a former geographical pole, like shown in former articles, it suddenly starts to make sense. How long ago could this former pole have been there? Not 1,500 years ago, that’s for sure. We are talking about hundreds of thousands of years ago. A stunning conclusion.

Just recently researchers discovered another pyramid beneath El Castillo. El Castillo was built upon an older pyramid, but the orientation of the foundation never changed.

One of the Best Available Maps of Chichen Itza

This is one of the most accurate maps of Chichen Itza. It almost matches the reality (only platform of Venus is incorrect). Most maps of Chichen Itza are completely useless for serious research. This map was received from an anonymous source
This is one of the better maps of Chichen Itza, but not the best one. It almost matches the reality (only platform of Venus is incorrect). Most maps of Chichen Itza are completely useless for serious research. | © 2016 Buildreps
 
Nr
Building
Orientation relative to Current Geo North
Intersection Point on Reference Line*
HotSpot or Node
#1
El Castillo
23.0°
62.8°N
Y
#2a
El Caracol (Base)
27.0°
59.1°N
N
#2b
El Caracol (Top)
22.5°
63.3°N
Y
#3
High Priest’s Grave
20.0°
65.8°N
Y
#4
Temple of the Warriors
21.0°
64.8°N
Y
#5
Main ‘Ball Court’
17.0°
69.0°N
N
#6
Platform of Venus
19.0°
66.8°N
N
#7
Mercado
10.0°
76.9°N
Y

The chance that 3 or less of the 8 buildings match with three of the hotspots (or nodes) is quite large. But the chance that 5 out of 8 buildings (5 times ‘Y’ and 3 times ‘N’) match with one or more of the hotspots is much less than the standard probability.

The graph below shows how the probability is distributed in this very specific situation.

Additional studies are done in this very specific situation of Chichen Itza, and will be published in the book “Atlantis is Here”. The study delivers the mathematical proof that the site of Chichen Itza has been reoriented several times after crustal shifts.

Mathematical Proof That Chichen Itza Was Oriented to Ancient Geo Pole

The probability that 5 of the 8 buildings of Chichen Itza are oriented by accident to one or more of the mathematical nodes is less than 0.2%. When we process all 46 buildings on Chichen Itza we find that they correlate for 99.99970% with the shifting crust pattern. That, of course, is no coincidence. It proves that Chichen Itza’s history extends over more than 350,000 years.| © 2016 Buildreps

Dimension of the former North pole Circle

Like explained in former articles, is there due to construction and measuring errors a necessary margin. This margin is expressed in the dimension of the red dots as shown on the map below.

The red dot of Pole IV has a diameter of about 400 km (250 miles). It appeared, after much experimentation, measurements and calculations, that the majority of the ancient builders (>55%) around the world were able to align their structures within this predefined circles.

Most pyramid builders were able to determine the position of their Geographic North pole and to built their construction within this accuracy.

Chichen Itza Was Reconstructed

Chichen Itza was dilapidated and covered with tons of earth. It is restored in the early 20th century. How old is Chichen Itza really? How many times could it have been restored before? Were the Mayans not the builders, but the restorers?
The pyramids of Giza are perfectly aligned to the CURRENT geographical pole. Why is El Castillo not?

Why is Chichen Itza Oriented Like This?

Most people never ever looked at the phenomenon of structural (cardinal) orientations, and might ask: “what do you mean with oriented like this?

If you take a look at the pyramids of Giza, Borobudur, or the Taj Mahal to name just a few among the many, you will notice two things:

  • The buildings were built in abandoned places,
  • The buildings are perfectly oriented to the current geographical pole.

Why? Every important temple or pyramid is aligned to true North (cardinally aligned).

Look where Chichen Itza is located. It is built in the middle of nowhere. The nearest coast is 60 miles off. There are no mountains or other geographic obstacles nearby that would prevent a cardinal positioning of the four-sided structures.

So, why is El Castillo oriented in this way? And why is El Caracol, an astronomical observatory, oriented like this? And why is not one single building on Chichen Itza cardinally oriented? And why are they not all oriented in the same direction?

Did the builders just ignore the North pole, or was their geo North at another position then?

There are pyramids, like Giza or in China, that are facing North, and so they are ‘aligned’ to the geo North pole. What follows from this is that the intersection point of the two lines intersects BY DEFINITION on the North pole. | © 2016 Buildreps

Why Are Many Famous Observatories Cardinally Oriented?

  • Harvard College Observatory (Cambridge)
  • Whitin Observatory (Wellesley)
  • Holcomb Observatory and Planetarium (Indianapolis)
  • Allegheny Observatory (Pittsburgh)
  • Dyer Observatory (Brentwood)
  • Bradley Observatory (Decatur)
  • Yerkes Observatory (Williams Bay)
  • Chamberlin Observatory (Denver)
  • Sommers-Bausch Observatory (Boulder)
  • Mount Laguna Observatory (San Diego)
  • Haleakala Observatory (Maui)
  • Big Bear Solar Observatory (Big Bear City)

Many cities in the US, like Los Angelos, Chicago, Houston, and Phoenix are mainly North-South oriented (cardinally aligned). Why is that? If the cities aren’t cardinally oriented, like New York, or Philadelphia there was a geographic reason for it, like coastlines, rivers, old highways, or mountains ranges. If nothing obstructs you, is a cardinal orientation the only logical thing to do.

For an observatory seems a cardinal orienatation also the only logical thing to do, although these days with modern GPS system, it isn’t necessary anymore to orient the directions. But it is still the default value of good mastery, comparable with the use of terminology between professionals.

A good architect doesn’t design only a functional building, but also a building that is adjusted to the seasonal influences, like the incidence of light, and like the orientation to the rising and setting sun. Most architects have a deep desire to orient North-South or East-West. When an architect designs an observatory, what would be the main things this architect would take into account?

  1. Stability (vibrations disturb the study of celestial bodies)
  2. Clarity of the atmosphere (pollution disturbs a clear view)
  3. Orientation (orientation is crucial to distinguish which object is where)

An Example – Orientation of the Harvard Observatory

The only ‘rational’ oriented building in this area is the Harvard Observatory – it is oriented to true North. It is denoted by the circle. But why is it oriented like this? This way of orienting takes more space and is more expensive.

Why is El Castillo Not Cardinally Oriented?

It is said that El Castillo is famous for an occurrence that returns twice each year, the so called spring and fall equinoxes. Although the phenomenon is not as precise as claimed, many people tragically believe in these fairytales when it comes to ancient structures.

As the equinox sun sets, an effect of shadows creates the appearance of a ‘snake’ that undulates down the stairways of the pyramid. Is this serious?

An equinox is just one of the many events that can be studied. Why limiting to only this event? And why building a pyramid for something that limits the builders?

The fact is that you will always find certain effects at any time of the year on any pyramid. Many people see something in clouds, or in sand patterns. Why would anyone built a pyramid to imitate some meaningless event?

Was Chichen Itza an Astronomical Observatory?

El Castillo was once cardinally oriented. A very long time ago. Every pyramid was once cardinally oriented. Or still, like the pyramids of Giza are now.

The site of Chichen Itza is one big astronomical observatory that has been rebuilt and reconstructed many millennia ago, after a few major global catastrophes. But the foundations never changed its orientation. The renovations were done on top of the old foundations – a practice we still apply today.

After every earth crust displacement, which was a catastrophe over an extended period of time, was the site restored and extended with again new pyramids that were oriented to again a new geographical pole.

El Castillo is the towering icon of Chichen Itza. It was once cardinally aligned.

#1 – Orientation of El Castillo

El Castillo is the towering icon as well as the main attraction of Chichen Itza. El Castillo is perfectly square. It doesn’t seem to discriminate any of the four cardinals.

El Castillo has been built on top of another, older pyramid that is orientated in the same way.

It is a so called step pyramid with stairs on four sides and a plateau with a ‘temple’ on top. The four flights of stairs consist of 91 steps each, plus the platform as the last step.

In total has El Castillo 365 (4×91+1) steps, as many as there are days in a year. The pyramid is 30 meters high, including the ‘temple’. The pyramid is obviously related to one solar cycle.

Up to now, has no one ever been able to explain the seemingly pointless orientation of El Castillo – 23° deviating from the North.

There are many ‘equinox worshippers’ who try to explain why El Castillo is oriented like this. None of them make really sense. The only rational explanation, is also the most unbelievable one – El Castillo was oriented to an ancient geo North pole.

We are actually talking about the orientation of the foundation of El Castillo. El Castillo was renovated by our modern society at the beginning of the 20th century. It was probably renovated many, many times before that, by our ancient ancestors. It has always been renovated upon that same old foundation, which was still oriented to a very ancient North pole.

The Location of an Ancient North Pole

The orientation of El Castillo points to one of the mathematical nodes (RED DOT) which reveals a former geo Pole. These former poles are mathematically proven, that means that the foundations of El Castillo are VERY old. | © 2016 Buildreps

Same Time Frame as El Castillo (#1) – A Selection

Site
Country
GPS Coordinates
Bearing
Intersection point with Reference Line
Great Pyramid of Cholula
Mexico
19.0575N, 98.3019W
25
63.7N, 45W
Comalcalco
Mexico
18.2780N, 93.20058W
22
65.2N, 45W
Uxmal
Mexico
20.3583N, 89.772W
21
65.8N, 45W
A selection: 3 out of 40 ancient structures that are oriented to the same location. The odds that 40 randomly spread structures cross that same small area is less than 0,003%.

#2a – The Base of El Caracol

The base of El Caracol is oriented to an even more ancient position of the North pole. El Caracol was an astronomical observatory. These structures are in most cases cardinally oriented. | © 2016 Buildreps

#2a – Orientation of the BASE of El Caracol

The base of El Caracol, which is believed to be an ancient astrological observatory, seems to be the oldest structure on Chichen Itza.

Due to the chosen (mathematical) method, is the orientation cluster in which El Caracol is listed, too small. Therefore is it not solid enough to conclude that the base of El Caracol was oriented to a former geographic pole. There could be numerous reasons for this.

The mathematical method uses the dataset as a whole, and separating one of the clusters of this whole is illogical. The base of El Caracol is even older than El Castillo, although it seems to be unprovable yet. It orients perfectly with the Great Ziggurat of Ur in Iraq, and Gunung Padang in Indonesia. Both structure are believed to be very old.

Maybe it was built before a time that the crust stabilized for a longer period of time. It remains speculative. We will probably never know.

The BASE of El Caracol is NOT Oriented to an Ancient Pole

The base of El Caracol was NOT oriented to an ancient geo North pole. | © 2016 Buildreps

#2b – Orientation of the TOP of El Caracol

The TOP of El Caracol is clearly diverging from the base. It seems viable to claim that the TOP is cardinally reoriented. | © 2016 Buildreps

#2b – Orientation of the TOP of El Caracol

As you can see on the drawing above is the top of El Caracol, which is believed to be the actual observatory, clearly diverging from the base. It seems viable to claim that the top is cardinally reoriented.

The top of El Caracol is oriented to the same hotspot as El Castillo. One of the former geo North poles on Greenland. A very long time ago.

El Caracol and El Castillo are built in the same time frame, and probably renovated many times thereafter.

Correlation Between Earth Crust Shifts and Ice Ages

The correlations between crustal shifts and periods of glaciations are clear. The crust shift is the sudden drop of temperature. The larger the drop, the larger the crustal shift. It correlates to the Milankovitch cycles as well. | © 2015-2017 Buildreps

In this comprehensive former article is explained why the Milankovitch cycles correlate to ice ages. Earth crust displacements correlate to the ‘descending edge’ of the glaciation graphs, and correlate one to one with the Milankovitch cycles.

We are in fact talking about one and the same thing:

  • Latitudinal Earth Crust Displacements = Ice Ages
  • Ice Ages = Milankovitch Cycles
  • Milankovitch Cycles = Latitudinal Earth Crust Displacements

Humanity is much older than we have learned at school. The paradigm of “history”, imprinted in our brains from our early youth, is nothing more than an additional veil of ignorance.

© 2016 by Buildreps

First published: March 7, 2016

Why Ruins Conimbriga Are Not Built by Romans

Across Europe are countless numbers of Roman settlements allegedly built by Romans. Take for example the Ruins of Conimbriga, they would be built by the Romans. But new research shows why that is highly unlikely.

A detail of Conimbriga. Note the new stone layers on top of the older stone layers. They are not of the same kind.

Who Built Conimbriga?

The answer to that question seems to be an easy one. Look it up in history books, and you will find: “Conímbriga is one of the largest Roman settlements excavated in Portugal.”

Wikipedia says about these ancient ruins: “Like many archaeological sites, Conímbriga was evolved sequentially and built up by successive layers, with the primary period of occupation beginning in the 9th century; during this period the area was occupied by a Castro culture.” Another page on Wikipedia tells you that the Roman empire ceased to exist around the 5th century AD.

Why do we have to excavate something that was just about 2,000 years ago? Did we have to excavate the Colosseum? No. Or why is the Pont du Gard still standing as if it was built just a few centuries ago? Why is the majestic Colosseum-like arena in Nimes still at the same ground level as the rest of the city? Because it is just about 2,000 years old.

Look at the Pantheon, it is surrounded by contemporary buildings which are built at exactly the same ground level. Why had the Pantheon not to be excavated while it is about 2,000 years old? Many of these questions have never been answered sufficiently.

Our history has been falsified at a grand scale, which is now finally proven with a new mathematical method.

How Old Are Ground Layers?

The answer to that question also seems an easy one. But is it?

Chronostratigraphy is the branch of stratigraphy that studies the age of rock strata in relation to time. It can tell us something about how deep a construction can be in relation to its age. It’s not a precise indicator, but it can filter out some of the rubbish.

How old could these deepest Mayan ruins be? Based upon the ground specs they are at least 650,000 years old. Any other claim is irrational.

For example if we have to dig up the ground floors of an ancient building somewhere between 20 and 30 feet deep, how old could that be? It depends of the type of soil.

If you look for example into the depth-time relation of an average peatland you will find at a depth of about 10 feet remains of an age of about 5,000 years.

The deeper you go, the firmer the ground becomes, the longer compression takes. In the same peatlands you will find at a depth of about 20 feet remains of an age of about 25,000 years. It gives an indication how soil compression proceeds. Note that you cannot draw rock solid conclusions from this yet, but it gives some indications. A sort of rough framework.

Deep Excavations in Solid Terrain

If we do the same in more solid, rocky terrain you will see that at the same depth of about 10 feet things are much older. At 10 feet deep the sediments can be easily 300,000 years old.

Regarded from the mainstream paradigm it’s a problem when we find ancient constructions or findings at that depth in that kind of soil. They require nonsensical mythos stories to make them just a few thousand years old. In most cases are these explanations unscientific attempts to safe the ruling paradigm. And still, most people swallow them like sheep.

If we look around the world, at the countless ancient structures, you will be flabbergasted if I tell you in how much soil these structures were covered. That doesn’t happen in just a few thousand years. This is a first indication things are not what they seem, and archaeologists are not going to help you to find the exit of the maze.

Teotihuacan Was Once Covered With Thick Layers of Sediment

Not many people know that Teotihuacan was covered with a thick layer of sediments, while archaeologists tell us it’s 1800 years old. It took 75 years to remove the sediments. This also stinks to falsification of our ancient history.
 

Is Our Ancient History Falsified?

Across Europe are numerous Roman settlements found. Take for example the Ruins of Conimbriga; they would have been allegedly built by the Romans. But new research shows why that is highly unlikely.

Why did I pick Conimbriga as an example? Because it contains the key to one of the ancient secrets: orientation patterns.

This article will not only present the likelihood that the Romans did not built this city, it will also show you the likelihood how old this city really is, and what might have happened in the distant past.

This new research also suggests that the Roman era simply overtook much older cultures, destroyed it, made it their own and presented the remains as if it was theirs. It seems that the Romans stood at the cradle of one the biggest fabrications and falsifications in history. The current power of the Vatican is still built upon this colossal lie once established by the Roman empire.

It shows us clearly that the rise and fall of the Roman empire, the successive rise of the sheer unlimited power of the Vatican, and the falsification of our history on a grand scale are related. It is going hand in hand as one. If you believe you’re a descendant from a primitive species which has to be educated, properly clothed, and submitted to the authority, and not from a high developed civilization, you are more willing to listen to this ‘new kid in town’. Metaphorically speaking – if you believe you’re the child of a peasant you will never claim the throne.

Not to forget the Spanish conquistadors who under the flag of the same Catholic church destroyed complete cultures in Latin America. This same church is involved in falsifying also this ancient history.

Sedimentation Rates – Observed Relations Between Age and Depth

Region
Depth / 100,000 years
Central Asia
3.75-5.00 m (11-15 ft)
Central China
6.70 m (20 ft)
Central Europe / Alps
1.00 m (3 ft)
North East America
0.90-1.00 m (3 ft)
Colorado Texas
0.80-0.87 m (2.5-3ft)
Low Lands South of Hudson Bay
42.00 m (120 ft)

This table above shows you have to be aware about the location where ruins are found. The type of soil determines the relation between depth and age, and there is a logic to it that most people will understand intuitively.

You might drown in a swamp, but not on rocky ground. That says something about how deep you find ancient ruins. On most solid rocky soils, it takes more than 100,000 years before an ancient building is covered with about 3 feet of sediments. Keep that in mind.

Carbon Dating is a False Fabrication

Interestingly enough, when the 14C dating method is involved in determining the age of specific ground layers, the ratio between depth and age suddenly jumps with a factor between 20 and 40. These were the first indications that the 14C dating methods are involved in a delusion of the facts.

When this method was introduced in the late 1940s, many archaeologists jumped a hole in the clouds because they hoped that ancient artefacts between a few hundreds down to about 60,000 years old could be dated much more accurately. But there are many reasons why this method is highly unreliable. I won’t go too deep into this issue here, because it is a very technical treatise.

The 14C dating method is highly technical and will be covered in future articles and in the book “Atlantis is Here”. 14C is an extremely sophisticated hoax that supports and even reinforces the agenda of historical falsifications.

Be honest – who dares to question the outcome of a 14C analyses? Based on what can you even question this method other than rhetoric and strong words? Only mathematics can unveil the falseness of this method.

Rock Wall Texas

Rock Wall in Texas is much older than 100,000 years.

Rock Wall Texas

Take for example Rock Wall in Texas. Most Americans have never heard of this very ancient wall. Is it because they are non-stop dumbed by the mainstream media?

Parts of Rock Wall had to be dug up from a depth ranging from 10 up to 40 feet. It was discovered by accident in the midst of the 19th century. Even today there is not much knowledge about this wall. The depth at which the wall was found indicates it is much older than 100,000 years. From the orientation patterns of the upper parts of this ancient construction we can conclude it is at least between 240,000 and 270,000 years old. The deeper parts are probably much older, but we have no information about them yet.

Note also that all findings of this age are out of scope of the 14C method.

The paradigm Stone age, Bronze age, and Iron age – an idea for which no one seems to be responsible – does not allow (yet) a sophisticated and highly organized society way beyond 100,000 years ago. But this will change rapidly as the fake ideas of the current scientists vaporises.

A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.

— Max Planck

Back to Conimbriga – the Site Plan

Conimbriga seems to be criss-cross oriented, but when we measure and process the orientations of the main buildings something astonishing happens.
 

What About Conimbriga’s Site Plan?

The criss-cross orientation of the buildings at Conimbriga seem to be nothing special. But when we correlate the buildings on this site they correspond for 88% to the locations of the five geographic poles. These ancient geo poles range back over a period of about 340,000 years.

I know that geology tells us the geographic pole did not move over the last one million years. But the odds are a whopping 1 to 209 trillion (latest data June 2017) that this is not true. Greenland (as well as the whole crust) shifted over the North Pole and that is the reason why Greenland is (still) covered in ice, and also why it is currently melting.

How large are the odds that the orientation of the ruins of Conimbriga correlate for 88% with the five proven geo poles? That’s including our current geographic North pole.

We can sort this out mathematically.

Five Geographic Poles Over the Last 340,000 Years

The Earth’s crust has moved on the rhythm of the eccentric orbit around the Sun. The four former poles are proven mathematically. For example Pole II: 1 to 209 trillion. Conimbriga correlates for 88% with this pattern.

How the Site Correlates to Former Geographic Poles

The site of Conimbriga correlates for 88% with the PROVEN former geographic North poles. Pole VI is still unproven, which makes any correlation to that former pole illogical.
 

The Odds to Correlate to Ancient Poles

Pole
Probability
I
6.7%
II
3.3%
III
4.4%
IV
V
5.5%
VI
Combined
0.00054% or 1 to 185,000
To understand where these calculations are based upon other articles have to be read. In the book “Atlantis is Here” the calculations are fully explained.

Why the Outcomes Have to be Nuanced

The outcome 0.00054% or 1 to 185,000 has to be downsized. There is a good reason for that. A skeptic might argue that Conimbriga was picked to serve a specific purpose, and that could be true.

The full dataset consists of 501 buildings and constructions spread around the world. Conimbriga is also represented in tis database with five buildings.

Leaving out all the complicated calculations and details, we can say with 99.9882% certainty that Conimbriga’s history goes back 340,000 years, which is quite another story. When a historian tells you a story it was a Roman settlement of about 2,000 years old, he/she could be right for: 0.0118%. That’s not very much! Keep that in mind about ALL ancient sites spread around the world.

Our history has been falsified to make you believe our ancestors were nothing more than stupid morons. A huge lie. And that idea is something you have to reprogram in yourself.

Other Sites Showing Similar Reorientation Patterns

Site
Country
Reorientations
Becan
Mexico
3 times (67%)
Calakmul
Mexico
3 times (100%)
Carnac
France
2 times (100%)
Chichen Itza
Mexico
4 times (100%)
Cobá
Mexico
2 times (100%)
El Tajín
Mexico
4 times (75%)
Eshnunna (Sumer)
Iraq
3 times (100%)
Harappa
Pakistan
2 times (100%)
Labna
Mexico
2 times (100%)
Lamanai
Belize
2 times (100%)
Mehrgarh
Pakistan
2 times (100%)
Mixco Viejo
Mexico
2 times (100%)
Moral Reforma
Mexico
3 times (67%)
Palenque
Mexico
3 times (67%)
San Andrés
El Salvador
2 times (50%)
Tikal
Guatemala
2 times (50%)
Tula
Mexico
2 times (100%)
Uxmal
Mexico
3 times (100%)
Xochicalco
Mexico
3 times (100%)
The number between brackets (xx%) means the amount of different orientations of a site that successfully matches to one or more of the former geographic poles. The 5 bold printed reorientations meet the same requirements as Conimbriga.
© 2015-2017 by Buildreps

The Movie “Atlantis is Here” PART III: Mathematical Proof of an Unbelievable Reality

Part 3 of this series will show you with a series of animations how Earth Crust Shifts stunningly relate to the glaciation graphs over the last 340,000 years.

The civilizations which are related to these eras are hundreds of thousands years old. Remember one thing clearly – it is not about the top structures, most of them are renovated many times, like we renovate our homes once in a while, it is about the ORIENTATION of the FOUNDATIONS. When this purely mathematical entity is processed in large numbers, this Unbelievable Reality unfolds.

The series of videos is a precursor of the book “Atlantis is Here”. The video starts with the simple question why Greenland is covered in ice. This simple question has never been sufficiently answered by mainstream science.

New, ground breaking research has found out that Earth Crust Shifts, Ice Ages, and ancient structures like pyramids and temples are closely related. This new theory proves mathematically 4 former geographic poles with certainties from 99.99% and higher.

Greenland was located on the North pole between 200,000 and 110,000 years ago (at location 74.0N, 47.1W). When the crust started to shift 110,000 years ago, which took place over a period of about 60,000 years, the crust shifted with an average speed of about 25 meters per year. This constant slow movement caused massive disruption over an extended period of time.

The certainties of the position of the last two poles are incredible high: 1 to 209 trillion for Pole II and 1 to 20.4 trillion for Pole III that they are coincidental. You can toss any other theory in the trash can that presents any other “truth” based on so called “scientific evidence” gathered from the local scene. The fact is that you don’t have to “be there” to find out what is true. That’s a false narrative. Mathematics is the only thing you actually need, together with a sharp pencil and a piece of paper.

Before that we were able to track back three other earth crust displacements. All four movements fit seamlessly on the glaciations cycles as taken from the ice cores on Antarctica. The chance for the fit to be so accurately is 1 to 746,496, which makes the claims certain for 99.99987%.

The crust never shifted so wildly as Hapgood suggested in his theory. The earth had major shifts over the last 340,000 years. Hapgood also suggested that the crust shifted in the longitudinal direction. That also didn’t took place. The crust shifted in the latitudinal direction, which is a direct cause of the fact that earth is a rotating sphere. Every reaction to an external force takes place in the perpendicular direction of the rotational direction.

Most scientific theories are not accompanied with probability calculations as to how large the odds are that the claims are actually true. It is time the public starts to demand this, in order to prevent nonsense to be spread among the public, under the flag of the so called ‘scientific evidence’. For example: how much chance is there that the earth magnetic field actually flips? Just for 50%. Why is that? Because geology ignored and dismissed the possibility of a slow latitudinal crawling crust during high eccentric orbits of the earth around the sun. These crustal movements would also leave traces in the magnetizable sediments. There is no way to recognize from the samples alone what has moved – the core or the crust. Because of the fact that the magnetic core obviously moves, it is therefore not by definition the only variable that left traces.

This video has been brought out as a precursor of the book, because I think it is important to know for the general public. It will still take at least a year for the book to come out.

The Movie “Atlantis is Here” PART II: Pyramids, Lost Civilizations, and the Shifting Crust

This series of videos is a precursor of the book “Atlantis is Here”. The video starts with the simple question why Greenland is covered in ice. This simple question has never been sufficiently answered by mainstream science.

New, ground breaking research has found out that Earth Crust Shifts, Ice Ages, and ancient structures like pyramids and temples are closely related. This new theory proves mathematically 4 former geographic poles with certainties from 99.99% and higher.

Greenland was located on the North pole between 200,000 and 110,000 years ago (at location 74.0N, 47.1W). When the crust started to shift 110,000 years ago, which took place over a period of about 60,000 years, the crust shifted with an average speed of about 25 meters per year. This constant slow movement caused massive disruption over an extended period of time.

The certainties of the position of the last two poles are incredible high: 1 to many trillions that the found nodes over Greenland are coincidentally formed. You can toss every other theory in the trash can that presents any other “truth” based on so called “scientific evidence” gathered from the local scene. The fact is that you don’t have to “be there” to find out what is true. That’s a false narrative. Mathematics is the only thing you actually need, together with a sharp pencil and a piece of paper.

Before that we were able to track back three other earth crust displacements. All four movements fit seamlessly on the glaciations cycles as taken from the ice cores on Antarctica. The chance for the fit to be so accurately is 1 to 746,496, which makes the claims certain for 99.99987%.

The crust never shifted so wildly as Hapgood suggested in his theory. The earth had major shifts over the last 340,000 years. Hapgood also suggested that the crust shifted in the longitudinal direction. That also didn’t took place. The crust shifted in the latitudinal direction, which is a direct cause of the fact that earth is a rotating sphere. Every reaction to an external force takes place in the perpendicular direction of the rotational direction.

Most scientific theories are not accompanied with probability calculations as to how large the odds are that the claims are actually true. It is time the public starts to demand this, in order to prevent nonsense to be spread among the public, under the flag of the so called ‘scientific evidence’. For example: how much chance is there that the earth magnetic field actually flips? Just for 50%. Why is that? Because geology ignored and dismissed the possibility of a slow latitudinal crawling crust during high eccentric orbits of the earth around the sun. These crustal movements would also leave traces in the magnetizable sediments. There is no way to recognize from the samples alone what has moved – the core or the crust. Because of the fact that the magnetic core obviously moves, it is therefore not by definition the only variable that left traces.

This video has been brought out as a precursor of the book, because I think it is important to know for the general public. It will still take at least a year for the book to come out.

The Movie “Atlantis is Here” PART I: Greenland, the Geo Pole, and Ice Ages

This is the first video in a series of videos. The series is a precursor of the book “Atlantis is Here”. The video starts with the simple question why Greenland is covered in ice. This simple question has never been sufficiently answered by mainstream science.

New, ground breaking research has found out that Earth Crust Shifts, Ice Ages, and ancient structures like pyramids and temples are closely related. This new theory proves mathematically 4 former geographic poles with certainties from 99.99% and higher.

Greenland was located on the North pole between 200,000 and 110,000 years ago (at location 74.0N, 47.1W). When the crust started to shift 110,000 years ago, which took place over a period of about 60,000 years, the crust shifted with an average speed of about 25 meters per year. This constant slow movement caused massive disruption over an extended period of time.

Before that we were able to track back three other earth crust displacements. All four movements fit seamlessly on the glaciations cycles as taken from the ice cores on Antarctica. The chance for the fit to be so accurate is 1 to 746,496, which makes the claims certain for 99.99987%.

The crust never shifted so wildly as Hapgood suggested in his theory. The earth had major shifts over the last 340,000 years. Hapgood also suggested that the crust shifted in the longitudinal direction. That also didn’t took place. The crust shifted in the latitudinal direction, which is a direct cause of the fact that earth is a rotating sphere. Every reaction to an external force takes place in the perpendicular direction of the rotational direction.

Most scientific theories are not accompanied with probability calculations as to how large the odds are that the claims are actually true. It is time the public starts to demand this, in order to prevent nonsense to be spread among the public, under the flag of the so called ‘scientific evidence’. For example: how much chance is there that the earth magnetic field actually flips? Just for 50%. Why is that? Because geology ignored and dismissed the possibility of a slow latitudinal crawling crust during high eccentric orbits of the earth around the sun. These crustal movements would also leave traces in the magnetizable sediments. There is no way to recognize from the samples alone what has moved – the core or the crust. Because of the fact that the magnetic core obviously moves, it is therefore not by definition the only variable that left traces.

This video has been brought out as a precursor of the book, because I think it is important to know for the general public. It will still take at least a year for the book to come out.

 

Earth Crust Shifts Animation

Animation of a Shifting Geo Pole

It is for many people hard to imagine that a geographical pole, that is to say the whole crust, can shift. Mainstream science says it is impossible. It apparently isn’t impossible. The proof is in the numbers. Most new scientific discoveries are done by using the power of mathematics, and not just by digging somewhere in the ground.
This animation gives an indication of the involved ancient structures spread around the world which are used to find and to prove the locations of these ancient poles.
The mathematics behind it is much more precise and much more powerful than just these images you’re seeing here.
Note that the older a pole becomes the harder it is to prove. That has a few reasons:
  1. the older a pole the older the structures. The older the structures the less is left from them.
  2. the older a pole, the more shifts the crust had to endure. The orientation of the ancient structures became less accurate which you can see in the growing red dot.
  3. the larger a HotSpot (the red dot) becomes the more structures you need to prove that pole, but these structures are very hard to find.

These are the main reasons why the probabilities of the four former geographic poles drops. What is clear and even stunning is the consistency of the found mathematical patterns – there is currently not a single indication that the theory might be wrong. All indications focus to an inevitable conclusion, crustal shift in the latitudinal direction are real, and they relate to glaciation cycles.

The animation shows where the cradles of humanity can be found:

  • China,
  • around the Near East,
  • around Peru,
  • around Mexico.
Earth Crust Displacements over the last 350,000 years. The crust has shifted four times (five poles) in the latitudinal direction. More than 500 ancient structures, from pyramids and temples, to ancient ruins are used to locate the former poles and to prove the shifting crust. You might now understand why Greenland is covered in ice, and why it is melting. You now might also understand why ancient civilizations were lost multiple times, how the myths of the deluges came about. | © Buildreps 2015-2017.

Probabilities of these Pole Positions

The positions of these poles are not just some lines drawn to a few points, they are the result of extensive calculations and powerful mathematics. The ancient structures are independently spread from one another. The method says the following about the orientation of a building; it can be uniquely positioned within 90 degrees in regard to the current geographic pole, 45 degrees Eastward and 45 degrees Westward. When we mass process the data we find massive nodes in a vertical line over Greenland. The probabilities of these nodes to be formed coincidental are*:

  • Pole I (current pole): 1 to 2.4×1020;
  • Pole II (130-180 ka): 1 to 2.1×1014;
  • Pole III (210-230ka): 1 to 2.0×1012;
  • Pole IV (240-280ka): 1 to 69,219;
  • Pole V (330-370ka): 1 to 18,789.

That means we can be very certain, between 99.995% up to 100%, that these poles (the red dots) are:

  • correctly positioned;
  • of the correct size.

The same counts for the age of the geographic poles. The magnitude of the shifts correspond so accurate to the temperature jumps of the glaciations graphs that we can claim a correct time frame with 99.99987% certainty.

Draw your own conclusions what that means.

*these are the latest data, based upon the dataset of June 2017.

The Nephilim and Anunnaki

One of the most incredible facts of this complete new theory is that it confirms the age of the Sumerian structures; they are between 400,000 and 480,000 years old. The translated Sumerian tablets are speaking of about 420,000 years ago that the so called Nephilim and Anunnaki came to the earth. It is said in the Sumerian Tablets that the Anunnaki created Homo sapiens as their slaves to dig gold for them or whatever they wanted Homo sapiens to do.

That makes sense, a few considerations:

  • we still behave as slaves;
  • we’re easy to control;
  • docile;
  • we work and pay for our mind conditioning programs (all media and educations);
  • we cannot live freely in nature because we’re not adapted to this planet.

Remember what you are; you are not a slave, you are infinite awareness having an experience.

 

© 2017 by Mario Buildreps

About the Author

Mario Buildreps is a successful former businessman, and a graduate engineer. He is an independent researcher and dedicates his time to what he calls “finding the truth”.

Just little is known about the Earth, and just a little is known about our ancient past. But my recent discoveries, which are done outside of the official scientific community, revealed astounding insights, mathematical insights, into how these two are entangled.

Our ancient history, including a vast amount of ancient buildings, is at least 350,000 years old. That is not just an empty statement, no, it is backed up by a large amount of data and mathematical certainties. It appears to be that the work done by archaeologists, scholars, and historians over many decades revealed nothing about the truth of Humanity. It might even be so that the truth has been obscured deliberately, in order to prevent the masses from awakening.

An engineer doing the work of archaeologists and historians is often ridiculed, because it is supposedly the terrain of alleged experts. But if the experts would have done a good job, there wouldn’t be so many people questioning history and especially that of pyramids, ancient sites, ancient stories, flood myths, Sumerian tablets, stories about Anunnaki, massive blocks of stones and statues everywhere around the world. If these structures, stories and stones weren’t there there wouldn’t be much to question, but that’s obviously not the case.

So this engineer discovered something astounding, by using something he is good at – mathematics. The mathematical orientation patterns of ancient sites which reveal such clear patterns that it cannot be ignored. It has in fact nothing to do with stories about history, but with facts, and facts alone. Engineers are good with facts, preferably mathematical facts, and less good with stories. That’s probably the reason why our history has been messed up so badly by ignoring facts and by mainly fusing stories together to one big mess, one big falsehood.

Why We Only Need Mathematics

Whether we zoom in on atoms of the chair we are sitting on, or the flesh of our bodies, everything is composed of basically the same thing; atoms, with protons and neutrons in the nucleus. When we zoom in further we find only vibrations. Vibrations are solely mathematical.

I am convinced that everything is mathematical, and I’m therefore also convinced that we can express everything mathematically. To express things mathematically doesn’t count only for Quantum Mechanics or General Relativity, but also for our origin and our history. But that this doesn’t seem this way a first hand comes because we are programmed from our birth to listen to stories about our history. And we’ve learned that mathematics is just a tool, an abstract tool to get answers from. On top of that, are our senses completely unable to “probe” the invisible noumena, that underlies at everything we call matter. That’s why we’re so drawn into empiricism and materialism.

Check for yourself this question: Why has every successful scientific theory mathematics at its core? Wouldn’t that be because the underlying driver itself is mathematical? What else could it be?

Mathematics is able to unlock this conditioned state and show reality. The outcomes that mathematics shows us doesn’t seem to be believable at first hand, but that is because of the conditioned state we are in by education, parenting, study, media, science, etcetera. If we follow the path of mathematics blindly we unlock the most unbelievable truths of life. That is what the book “Atlantis is Here” is all about, unlocking our consciousness by showing the reality of things that science, religions, education, parenting, and politics have covered with blankets of lies over the centuries.

The book which is now in the making under the working title called “Atlantis is Here” will set many things straight:

– the true age of ancient structures;

– the true age and origin of Homo sapiens;

– the codes encrypted in many pyramids like Giza and Teotihuacan but also many others, and where they are pointing to;

– the mathematical relations between pyramids, temples, and dolmens around the world;

– why and how civilizations were lost multiple times;

– mathematical proof that ice ages were earth crust shifts and the cause of high civilizations to vanish;

– a scientific account for the cause of earth crust shifts;

– why CO2 is not the cause of global warming and lies at the basis of a grand hoax;

Many people feel there is something not right, but since science tells them what they have to think, it’s more or less end of story. Science is seemingly untouchable. Not anymore. The book will unlock and untangle many subjects that so many people are longing for. It is fully mathbased and it will be readable for most of us.

The title “Atlantis is Here” might change, the main thing the book wants to address is that you don’t have to look for Atlantis somewhere. It is right under our noses, but we fail to see it. It is our own consciousness we have to work on to get the truth out. The book will support mathematically what so many people are already feeling around the world.

The book is planned to be published in 2017. It will be published under the pseudonym of Mario Buildreps.

Contact: buildreps@gmail.com

Visual Database Pyramids and Temples

Are You Aware How Many Ancient Buildings There Are in the World?

Not many people are aware how many ancient buildings there actually are around the world. The list is incredibly long, and will never be complete. Around 57% of the ancient buildings, from pyramids, to temples, to complete ancient cities were oriented to one of the ancient geographical poles. Not all buildings were oriented to the cardinals, but most of them were.

Yes, the crust moved. It moved significantly. But it never moved abruptly like Charles Hapgood believed. The crust crawled slowly over tens of thousands of years during Earth’s high eccentric orbit around the Sun. Science believes it were Ice Ages caused by varying insolation, caused by the Milankovitch cycles. Wrong. Completely wrong. It was the crust that moved very slowly, which was interpreted as glaciation cycles. The Milankovitch cycles do not influence the energetic household of the Earth. But most scientists don’t seem to grasp that for a second. That’s because academical studies are of a too low quality, delivering each year more and more irrationals obsessed with materialism and empiricism.

You won’t find any other research like this in the world. It’s one of the most intriguing discoveries of the last decades. There were no ice ages seemingly caused by a miracle, it were latitudinal crustal displacements. Pyramids are not a few thousand years old, they are hundreds of thousands years old. Greenland is not melting because of Carbon Dioxide. It’s vast ice sheet was formed at the North Pole, between 110,000 and 270,000 years ago. It’s now located at a place where the ice sheet starts to melt very slowly.

Tragically, not much of the current sciences has the right view on our Planet and on the origin of Humanity, while they believe they are immutably spot on. When no one ever refutes science, while they mainly rely on sources of fellow researchers who were already wrong, science will continue to dig deeper into a cesspool of falsehood.

How old would a structure be when you have to dig for it about 8.5 meters deep, while the stratigraphic records show that the soil builds up between 1 to 1.5 meters per 100,000 years? That an elementary school assignment. That structure is about 650,000 years old. But because the ruling paradigm says that’s impossible it’s simply shifted aside.

This collage of ancient buildings contains about 60% of all the buildings which are in the most intruiging database of ancient buildings that is ever made.

Read the other articles and you might become aware how our history really looks like. Most ancient structures are much older than 100,000 years. That is not just a statement, no, it is mathematically proven with a complete new theory. The odds that the crust shifted, even multiple times, while advanced civilizations like ours were already present, are incredibly high: 1 to 209 trillion (1 to 209,000,000,000,000) that the largest node found on Greenland is coincidental.

In this new theory, which is developed by Mario Buildreps, the orientation of about 500 ancient structures around the world are measured and mass processed as a pattern. Orientation is a pure mathematical entity, and distills patterns that otherwise would be impossible to find: the true age of Humanity and the massive latitudinal crustal motions which took place which science has interpreted as ice ages.

Scroll through the list and get an idea why this new theory is so powerful – it’s still a fraction of the whole database. Enjoy scrolling!

A visual database of pyramids and temples around the world. Have you ever seen such a list? Here it is.
Preah Vihear Temple Tepe Sialk Conímbriga
Vikramashila Tikal Gunung Padang
Shahr-e Sukhteh El Mirador Xelha
Shahr-e Sukhteh Becan Chichen Itza
Nimrud Ek’ Balam La Venta Olmec
Pyramid of Djoser Harappa Great Ziggurat of Ur
Arg-é Bam Conímbriga Eshnunna (Sumer)
Q’umarkaj El Tajín Eshnunna (Sumer)
Copán Yaxchilan Yagul
Q’umarkaj Uxmal Yagul
Tell al-Rimah Uxmal Yagul
Peralta Yaxha Yagul
Castillo de Teayo Cempoala Cahuachi
Plazuelas Mixco Viejo Palenque
Xunantunich Moral Reforma Lambityeco
Xunantunich Quiahuiztlán Yapahuwa Temple
Caral Calakmul Chavín de Huantar
Tomb of Empress Dowager Bo El Tajín Pyramid of Koh-Ker
Tomb of Empress Dou Eshnunna (Sumer) Conímbriga
Tanais Akragas Túcume
The Lianhu Altar Tikal Al-Rahba castle
Tamgaly Kohunlich Chichen Itza
Sintashta Babylon La Campana
Court of Amenhotep III Becan Labna
Karnak Mitla Palenque
Dur-Katlimmu Cahuachi Gorgippia
Yaxchilan Prasat Phum Prasat San Gervasio
Yaxchilan Ake Mehrgarh
Jebel Barkal Moral Reforma Chichen Itza
Caral Aukana Buddha Temple Great Pyramid of Cholula
Burial complex in Xiadu El Tajín Avdat
Raqch’i Xochicalco Great Kyz Kala
Guachimontones Cerro de la Estrella San Andrés
Uruk Baalbek Comalcalco
Túcume Banteay Samré Ecbatana
Cobá Takht-e Soleymān Balamku
Bad-tibira (Sumer) Akragas Ziggurat of Ashur
Zabala (Sumer) Monte Albán Thanjavur Brahadeeswarar temple
Pyramids of Cochasqui (nr. 5) Ek’ Balam Kuara (Sumer)
Pucará de Tilcara Xpuhil Lamanai
Huaca del Sol Moral Reforma Hierapolis
Huaca del Luna Banteay Kdei Koshoy Korgon
Palmyra Yaxha Uxmal
Pyramids of Cochasqui (nr. 9) El Tajín Donegal
Caral Cempoala Tomb of Emperor Cheng of Han
Caral Puma Punku Calakmul
Eridu Monte Albán Xlapak
Tell Brak (Sumer) Kohunlich El Tazumal
Nineveh Temple (Sumer) Becan Yagul
Yaxchilan Akragas Yagul
Sippar (Sumer) Altun Ha Toniná
Ollantaytambo Mari El Tepozteco
Tomb of Emperor Hui of Han Templo Mayor Pella
Larsa (Sumer) Ake Leptis Magna
Pyramids of Cochasqui (nr. 14) Eastern Mebon temple Dainzú
Acozac Neak Pean Santa Cecilia Acatitlan
Isin (Sumer) Phnom Chisor Tula
La Joya Copán Antipatris
Kom Ombo temple Tikal Becan
Zaculeu Ishchali Pella
Hattusa Puma Punku Calakmul
Belvoir Fortress Tiwanaku Guachimontones
Chogha Zanbil Xochitecatl Edzna
Nuzi (Sumer) Segesta (temple) Teotenango
Zaculeu El Cerrito Teotenango
Caral Ta Prohm Altun Ha
Eshnunna (Sumer) Cempoala Chacchoben
Tzintzuntzan Monte Albán Tenayuca
Daorson Monte Albán Moral Reforma
Tomb of King Ling of Zhou Ake Carthage
El morro del tulcán Jerash Tomb of Consort Ban
Hattusa Beng Malea Tomb of Empress Xu
Yaxchilan Chau Say Tevoda Pompeii
Tomb of Emperor Gaozu of Han Pre Rup Becan
Tomb of Empress Lü Lothal Tomb of Emperor Zhao of Han
Ramesseum Baksei Chamkrong Tomb of Empress Li
Uruk Arg-é Bam Tomb of Empress Shangguan
Ggantija temple Kfar Bar’am synagogue Tomb of Emperor Wu of Han
Zaculeu Teopanzolco Sayil
Medinet Habu temple Tiwanaku Xochicalco
Kaminal Juyu Angkor Wat Teotenango
Choquequirao Bakong Lubaantun
Bonampak Phnom Bakheng Carnac
Caral Preah Ko Mehrgarh
Palmyra West Baray Apadana
Zaculeu Tomb of Emperor Ai of Han Chacchoben
La Joya Tomb of Emperor Jing of Han Teotihuacan
Cobá Tomb of Emperor Ping of Han Pompeii
Chersonesos Tomb of Emperor Wen of Sui Ujuxte
Quiahuiztlán Tomb of Emperor Xiaojing of Tang Kabah
Cobá Tomb of Emperor Yuan of Han Mayapan
Chan-Chan Tomb of Empress Fu Tula
Hattusa Tomb of Empress Wang Teotihuacan
Der (Sumer) Tomb of Empress Wang Meenakshi Temple
Motya Tomb of Empress Wang Pompeii
Borsippa Tomb of Empress Xu Pompeii
Girsu Tomb of First Emperor Comalcalco
Tomb of Marquis Zhang Ao Pyramids of Giza Edzna
Tomb of Three Kings of Zhou Temple of Horus Moral Reforma
Unknown Chinese Pyramid Naranjo El Tajín
Unknown Chinese Pyramid Yaxha Ka’ba-ye Zartosht
Unknown Chinese Pyramid Konark Sun Temple Becan
Zaculeu Srirangam Temple Yaxchilan
Mehrgarh Borobudur El Chanal
Larsa (Sumer) Masada (Byzantine church) Cempoala
Volubilis Dzibilchaltun Ishchali
Ruins at Ur Ek’ Balam Labna
Dur-Kurigalzu Ek’ Balam Palenque
Yaxchilan El Tajín Becan
San Andrés Mayapan Calakmul
Saksaywaman Mixco Viejo Tula
Yaxchilan Xochicalco Carnac
Chan-Chan Harappa Rockwall
Palenque Conímbriga Lamanai
Umma Lumbini

Climate Change Caused by CO2 – Is it True?

What is Climate?

The climate debate has become hotter than ever. There are many Internet forums where supporters and opponents of carbon induced global warming incessantly bombard each other with arguments. It’s a jammed trench warfare. The discussion hasn’t made one inch of progress over the years.

Where is climate actually made of? Temperature, humidity, wind speed, rainfall, and sunny hours give a good indication of what climate actually is. When the patterns of these five variables permanently change on a significant scale we could speak of a changing climate. Is this ever done properly on a global scale? No, it isn’t. It’s because earth’s climate system is an amazing complex system, and still far beyond the reach of human comprehension.

Is our climate really changing? And if that is so why could it be changing?

This map gives a good indication what happened over the last decades. Some areas are heating up, and some are cooling down. The Southern hemisphere cools down, the Northern hemisphere warms up. The global result is a warming up. The cause? | © 2016 by Buildreps

Own Research Versus Copy-Paste Believes

It is widely believed, also in the climate change discussion, that we can control the climate like in our cars by reducing CO2 emissions.

A glimpse on the historical data shows us that the temperatures changed constantly over the history. Who or what made this CO2 a few hundreds of thousands of years ago? Or is CO2 the effect and not the cause? Because that would explain more then vice versa.

Is our climate changing? And when that appears to be the case, what is the cause? Are we able to find out ourselves what is really going on? Yes, we are able to find out much more by ourselves than we tend to believe at first hand. But that requires a lot of work. Not many people are willing to do that for just a song.

The Northern hemisphere warms up, and the Southern hemisphere cools down. The net result of both, based on about 100 weather stations, is a global warming over a period of about 50 years. Is that true? | © 2016 by Buildreps

The Relation Between CO2 and Climate Change

The relation between CO2 and temperature is obvious. Whether we look at recent records, or at ice core data, the relation is always present.

The amount of sun spots and the Sea Surface Temperatures (SST) show a clear relation. But sun spots can only account for temperature swings up to plus/minus 1 degree Celsius.

What can we say more than the simple conclusion that CO2 is responsible for climbing temperatures? But is that conclusion really so simple? The relations are so obvious that only a fool dares to say that CO2 is not responsible for climate change.

Some cases of cause and effect are simple and obvious: does asbestos cause cancer, or does cancer causes asbestos? Because asbestos preceded the cancer, it is the cause.

But not all cases are so obvious. Does CO2 cause climate change or does climate change cause CO2?

Another case of cause and effect; are the wheels of a car responsible for the turning of the steering wheel or is it vice versa? There might be some odd cases where former situation counts. The steering mechanism is so tightly connected to eachother, that if we wouldn’t know better, we would have a very hard time to find out objectively what is the cause and what the effect. The tolerance in the system, when we change direction would be the only way to find out the cause.

This is called hysteresis.

The thing that lags behind would be ipso facto the effect. Grasping this principle is crucial, also for our climate.

The relation between CO2 and temperature change is obvious. Denying there is a relation equals to stupidity. But the real question must be; is CO2 the cause of temperature change? Or are we mistaking an obvious effect as the cause?

 

The Elephant in the Room: CO2 Lags Behind

If we analyse the data by zooming in we see that CO2 lags behind on temperatures. Who knows that? The climate scientists know about it, but ignore this problem stubbornly. It is the elephant in the room. A huge problem.

In a feedback mechanism the cause is always ahead of the effect. When the alleged cause is lagging behind we can ipso facto not speak of a feedback mechanism. When you want to make something responsible as the cause, but that “thing” is lagging behind we might have a problem on our hands in our theory. We could try to deal with it as a feedforward mechanism. It must look into the future. But these systems:

  • function only properly when effects of disturbances are predictable;
  • function only properly when they don’t generalize to other conditions;
  • destabilize when the system changes.

None of these three conditions comply to earth’s climate. The climate system is no feedforward mechanism, because the earth changed significantly over the many hundreds of millions of years, while the ‘setpoint’ temperature remained the same. It shows clearly we are dealing with a feedback mechanism where cause and effect follow each other.

To become aware of the fact that CO2 is lagging behind you must zoom in on the data. I collected the data from Vostok and Dome-C, and processed them. How many people have done this? Just a few. How many people just swallow what’s presented to them. Most. What if everything that’s presented to you is wrong?

It is crucial to grasp that if you want to know which is causing what, you need much data where the direction changes, like the graph below. The lag between input and output is called hysteresis.

In the graph below there is not one single example where CO2 is not lagging behind on changes of temperature.

Temperature Leads CO2 by an Average of About 2,000 Years

The Vostok Data from Antarctica show a clear relation between temperature and CO2 levels. The CO2 levels lag behind on temperatures about 2,000 years. In simple words, CO2 cannot be the cause of temperature changes by definition. | © 2016 by Buildreps

Positive and Negative Feedback Mechanisms

The Greenhouse effect is often presented as a mix of both positive and negative feedback mechanisms.

The essence of negative feedback is that such systems have a tendency to stabilize itself at a certain setpoint, or always swing around the setpoint, while positive feedback systems have a tendency to run out of control or to block completely.

There are many climate scientists who believe (note that it’s never been proven) that CO2 is the cause and the effect. Does anyone remember the bootstrap problem? The man who lifted himself from the swamp by pulling himself out by pulling on his boots. That’s an example where cause and effect fuse. But how does that work scientifically? This is the kind of ‘science’ climate scientists believe in without any solid foundations.

Did the climate ever run out of control? No. If we look at long term climate records, the temperatures always returned to a certain ‘setpoint’. Therefore we can say that there is a strong negative feedback mechanism at work in the climate system, much stronger than any possible positive feedback mechanism. Since CO2 lags on the temperatures it cannot be the cause. By definition not. It doesn’t help to construct amazing difficult theories. Never ignore Occam’s Razor!

CO2 lags behind on temperature and is therefore ipso facto not the cause. CO2 is the effect, and temperature is the cause. Now, what causes the temperatures to change then?

Reasons Why Temperatures Increase in Urbanized Zones

About 85% of the measuring stations are on land, while land covers just about 33% of the planet. It is not difficult to see that when we use these data we introduce major errors when we try to calculate an average global temperature.

About 50% of the stations which are used to measure global temperature are situated on airports. Many of these stations are incorrectly located, which means they collect heat from the exhaust of airplanes or from the tarmac runway. Since the air traffic has increased, the heat collection by the sensors from the jet exhausts increases as well. The short, intense heat bursts of the engines accumulate to serious errors in many of the measurements.

Most other stations are located in expanding urbanized areas. The measurements are affected by growing traffic and growing heat radiation of buildings over the last decennials. The explosive growth of air conditioners on buildings added an enormous heat source to cities that also influenced the measurements of urban situated weather stations.

The slick looking presentations made by computer programmers of NASA, the WMO and the IPCC are based on flawed material, like a flag on a mud barge. Unbelievable, isn’t it? You’re actually looking at a lie that looks awesome. Because it looks great it makes most people believe it is therefore true. The fact is that these climate models have no scientific value at all.

The measurements from some of the stations in large urbanized areas have to be corrected by other nearby remote stations before they can be used to present a global warming map. And even if we do this, we still present only the temperatures at ground level. We have no idea what happens high up in the atmosphere, and deep down in the oceans.

How Accurate Are the Temperature Measurements?

After the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, the amount of weather stations dropped

There is a striking relation between the dropping amount of weather stations and the global rising temperature. After the collapse of the USSR about half of the cold stations fell into disuse, and so the data as well.

dramatically from about 12,000 in 1990 to about 6,000 stations in 1995. In the same period the alleged global temperature started to rise like a rocket taking off.

  • Cause: the “cold” stations were gone from the statistics. Mainly the warm urbanized stations remained.
  • Effect: the statistics started to present a distorted picture of the global temperatures.

Is that science? Not really. We might call it science of the delusion. The current models as shown by NASA, WMO or the IPCC are not representing the truth.

Recently a far better way of collecting data has come into use: Remote Sensing Systems, or shortly RSS. Satellites gather data over large areas by using microwave sensors. This data is much more reliable and much better to process than the old fashioned weather stations where most of the climate models are still based on.

If you don’t trust the results I present here, you can verify it yourself at the site of Remote Sensing Systems. The data shown here is not made in just one afternoon. It is the result of original research and hard labour. If you want to know what is true and what is false you must be prepared to work hard for scratch. Or just believe the data I present here is correct.

Over the last two decades the WHOLE atmosphere unmistakeably cools down. It is just a matter of time before the troposphere looses its warmth to the stratosphere. The whole atmosphere cooled down 0.2 deg C over the last 20 years. | © 2016 by Buildreps

RSS Results Over the Last Two Decades

Channel
Zone (m)
Density
+/- deg/yr
Net Ratio +/- deg/yr
1
0-10,000
65.00%
+0.0132
+0.008580
2
0-12,000
85.00%
+0.0179
+0.015215
3
1,000-25,000
80.00%
+0.0029
+0.002320
4
10,000-30,000
34.00%
-0.0262
-0.008908
5
10,000-33,000
33.00%
-0.0232
-0.007656
6
15,000-38,000
15.00%
-0.0358
-0.005370
7
18,000-45,000
8.00%
-0.0470
-0.003760
8
24,000-50,000
3.50%
-0.0496
-0.001736
9
28,000-55,000
2.00%
-0.0719
-0.001438
10
13,000-45,000
18.00%
-0.0389
-0.007002
ACCUMULATION:
-0.009755
This graph combines the 10 channels as shown above. When the channels are combined together in the right way, we see a small cooling down of the whole atmosphere. | © 2016 by Buildreps

The Atmosphere as a WHOLE is Cooling Down

Over the last two decades is the atmosphere as a whole unmistakeably cooling down. The whole atmosphere cooled down 0.2°C over the last 20 years. It is just a matter of time before the troposphere looses its warmth to the stratosphere.

The greenhouse gases may trap partially the collected warmth in the troposphere, but when the temperature difference (ΔT) between the lower and higher atmosphere increases, the troposphere will cool down. The cause: the second law of thermodynamics (energy flows from hot to cold) is much stronger than the greenhouse effect.

The CO2 levels will still rise for the next decades to come, while the temperature curves of the ground stations will level off. The climate movement will be confused how that is possible, because they still believe that CO2 is responsible for warming. The fact will become clear that the data analysis was incomplete and infantile.

Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO)

An example map how the PDO works at one certain moment. It reverses every 30 years. A total cycle is therefore 60 years. It is still fairly unknown terrain.

The Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO)

A fairly unknown phenomenon in the climate discussion is the PDO cycle, which offers a

PDO Cycles over the last century.

short-term (<60 yrs) explanation for the small temperature variations (and so for the release or absorption of CO2 by the oceans).

The Pacific Ocean covers a whopping 33% of earth’s surface. Even the minutest cooling or warming of this vast ocean has colossal impact on the release or absorption of CO2. That also explains why CO2 is lagging behind on the temperatures as shown above.

The most likely driver of the PDO are the Bretagnon cycles that oscillates over the much larger Halstatt cycles. Both these cycles are sun cycles.

What else is the best candidate for the temperature changes than the sun itself?

Midterm Hallstatt cycles and Short-term Bretagnon Wave Oscillation

The Hallstatt cycles and the Bretagnon wave cycles offer the best explanation of the PDO cycles. PDO at its turn causes absorption and release of CO2 of the oceans.

Where Does All the CO2 Come From?

The increase of CO2 from 290 ppm to about 400 ppm over the last 100 years is caused by the warming of the oceans. The oceans contain about 98% of all the carbon in the biosphere. The release of CO2 is partially caused by the above mentioned sun cycles, and by the rebound effect of the last (little) ice age.

What many people don’t know is that especially seawater is able to dissolve huge amounts of CO2. When temperatures of seawater drops it will dissolve more CO2. Logically, is this CO2 again released when the oceans temperature rise again. There is ipso facto a strong correlation between temperatures and CO2. But the water temperature of the ocean decides which levels of CO2 are released to the atmosphere.

This is in a nutshell what happened after the ice age ended. The ocean temperatures bounced back up again. On top of that accumulate a few midterm oscillations that cause constant small swings around the “setpoint”. This is why CO2 is lagging behind on temperatures.

The small CO2 variations we saw over the last three decennials are caused by ocean currents driven by a varying sun activity. The large CO2 increase over the last 12,000 years is the rebound effect of the last ice age.

The Joker is More Right Than Scientists


What Caused the Large Temperature Changes?

The big question is then: what caused the very large long-term temperature swings of the last glaciations?

  • Sun spots? No.
  • El Nino and El Nina? No.
  • Bretagnon oscillations? No.
  • PDO? No.
  • Hallstatt cycles? No.
  • Earth Crust Shifts? Yes!

Earth Crust Shifts are rejected and even ridiculed by geologists, while they offer the only true explanation for the very large long-term temperature swings around the “setpoint”. It is said there is no evidence for crustal shifts, while the paleomagnetic records provide the best evidence one can get. And what happens with ice core samples with the assumption that the crust was fixed? The interpretations will lead to conclusions of very large temperature swings, which in fact never took place. The location of the drill core changed location to another latitude, hence the other “readouts”.

Read the seemingly unrelated article below and you might understand how it works. The article “Why the Orientation of Pyramids Correlates to Ice Ages” proves that the last four glaciation cycles were in fact Earth Crust Shifts.

The only rational explanation for the ice ages are crustal shifts. They are caused by large eccentric orbits of earth around the sun (large tidal effects). That is the reason why ice ages relate so well to the Milankovitch cycles, which is also a confusion between cause and effect.

Is carbon induced climate change a hoax? Yes. A very big one too. So nothing appears what it seems to be!

This topic and many related topics will be covered in a book that’s currently in the making under the working title “Atlantis is Here”. The title refers to the idea that Atlantis was never gone. Only our own perception and consciousness temporarily left us, making it much harder for us to perceive the ultimate truths.

© 2016 by Buildreps

A Visual Idea What Happens After a Crustal Shift

Why we Only Find Stone Structures Around the World

This short video explains elegantly what happens when our current civilization would vanish from the face of the Earth. Stone structures are virtually the only remains we would find.

Structures like the Chinese Wall and the pyramids of Giza, and the countless other structures which are not made from steel reinforced concrete, will remain standing for hundreds of thousands of years. And these structures suggest that Earth was once inhabited by an advanced ancient civilization. Dating these structures would appear to be virtually impossible. For example the White House and the Vatican which are both oriented to our current Geographic pole would possibly leave some traces, mainly the foundations, that could tell something about this lost civilization.

Would we find much remains of the 7.5 billion people? Possibly not so much, since huge tidal waves literally washed the continents clean, megaquakes swallowed up complete buildings into the deep, and volcano eruptions burned many of the rest that was left. It was one of the many rejuvenation cycles of the Earth.

The new species would swear they arose from an ice age. The path of developing tools could possibly run similar as we think it went with our species – stone age, bronze age, iron age.

If our civilization vanished due to a crustal shift we would be able to trace back what could have happened by examining the orientation of foundations of the remaining buildings. That is to say if this civilization is both spiritually and intellectually advanced enough.

Just digging into the ground delivers very interesting artefacts and might reveal more information about some foundations, but determining the true age of these structures would be awesomely difficult, if not impossible, without introducing advanced mathematics. Examining the orientation of many buildings, at a mass scale all around the world of our lost civilization, would reveal the truth.

Relax and have a great watch!

 

How Old Are Pyramids Around the World?

New research suggests that most pyramids an temples around the world were built before fatal earth crust shifts. The orientation of large amounts of pyramids reveal former geographic poles. The proof has been delivered mathematically with a probability of 1 to 57.4 trillion that the finds and correlations are coincidental. Most pyramids are much older than always was assumed, way beyond our imagination.
Pyramids are believed to be not older than a few thousand years. They appear to be in some cases even older than 250,000 years, proven with a new mathematical theory. | © 2016 by Buildreps

Common Used Dating Methods

Determining the age of a pyramid is not as easy as it seems. Stones cannot be dated to determine the age of the structure, because what the researchers will find is the formation date of the rock material itself, and not when the stones were piled on top of each other.

Scientists pretend they have found a reliable way to date stone structures, while they only make associative, assumptive and subjective connections between the organic materials and the stone structures themselves. They claim it is reliable, but there’s no way for anyone to validate that claim. We cannot associate one thing to another with absolute certainty.

And that is directly the toughest problem in dating any stone structure: validation. There is not a single validation possible to back up any of the claims. Archaeology and history is mainly mythos, just stories without any reality value.

The most common way is to Carbon date organic artefacts left by ‘builders’ found inside and around pyramids, or organic materials that slipped between the stones. This method of dating is believed to be fairly accurate. It is often claimed as ‘evidence’ of the age of the structure.

How Are the Pyramids of Giza Dated?

The pyramids of Giza weren’t exclusively dated by dating excavated organic artefacts in and around the pyramids. It is also done by linking the inscriptions inside the pyramids with the era of the rulers and the architect Imhotep. But what if the inscriptions were a kind of graffiti left by kings who claimed the pyramids as their own?

How exciting these carved inscriptions might look, it doesn’t prove how old they really are. Christians claim that the Earth is 6,000 years old, based on the ‘inscriptions’ in the bible. Is this ‘evidence’? For them it is. There are even scientists among them.

And we still have countless unsolved questions around the building methods that were used as well.

What counts for Giza, counts for all pyramids. They are real hard nuts to crack.

What is Evidence?

According to the Oxford dictionaries can evidence be defined as: the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.

The words ‘scientific evidence’ are often misused to emphasize a certain belief or to label a certain theory.

We believe that the sun and the moon are the cause of tides on earth. But how do we know that for sure? The only evidence we have are clear patterns between the moon phases, orbits and the tides. From that we are able to develop a theory which predicts what will happen next. When we can verify it multiple times with our senses, we might become more certain the theory is complete and correct.

Proof is the final verdict that removes all doubts whereas evidence only leads one in the direction of a fact or statement. The foundations of pyramids are hundreds of thousands of years old: mathematically proven.

Classifying Pyramids in Time Frames

If we can relate pyramids around the world somehow, can we then classify them in a certain time frame? Yes, it appears we can. And this is the first step to take before diving into intimidating details. We can do that by analyzing the orientation patterns of pyramids spread around the world.

Analyzing the orientation of more than 500 pyramids and temples around the world, made it possible to classify the foundations – before or after the Great Flood(s). Floods and Ice Ages are one and the same event as you will see further on in this article. And it happened more than once in history.

The Great Flood and Pole Shifts

Is there evidence for a Deluge? Yes, there is in fact overwhelming evidence for a Great Flood. If we just look at the effects the melting water of the great ice sheets had on the coastlines some 12,000 years ago. All coastlines were flooded around the world because of this melting water.

The sea level rose about 120 meters. There are so many sunken cities all around the planet that it’s easy to understand they are older than 12,000 years. If you imagine that today, this would affect more than 60% of the Human population around the world.

Virtually all cultures speak about Great Floods in their sagas. Whatever scholars want to say about sagas, or even ridicule them, they hold a deep hidden truth in them. As I will show in this series of articles, the most probable cause of the floods were Earth Crust Shifts. Every shift marks the beginning of a new ice age.

It appears that because pyramids are square they can be used to find mathematical patterns in their orientation, especially when we examine them worldwide on a large scale. A jaw dropping pattern appears. And that is a breathtaking intensive math job, which is probably the reason no one has ever done it before. The patterns are overwhelming proof for the locations of former geographic poles.

  • Note: with North pole is always meant the geographical North pole. The theory of Earth Crust Shifts is not dealing about the magnetic poles. The geographical pole is the rotation axis of the earth.

Orientation of Giza

Giza is oriented to our current geo North pole and therefore constructed AFTER the Great Flood. They are older than 4,500 years and younger than 110,000 years. The Giza pyramids are with such a stupendous accuracy oriented to the North pole, that deviations beyond 0.06 degrees are not measurable.

Stupendous Accuracy

The statement that the pyramids of Giza are oriented to the current North pole (cardinally oriented) doesn’t knock people off their feet anymore. More important to know is that Giza is oriented to the current (geographic) North pole and therefore built after the Great Flood.

A Great Flood which was caused by an Earth Crust Shift that ushered the beginning of a the last ice age

There’s no doubt about the classification of these pyramids: they were built after the latest crustal shift. Which can be interpreted as after the Great Flood. The time frame we have here to classify Giza is between the current estimations, 4,500 years, and 110,000 years.

It is a contribution to the builders to orient such a big construction with great precision. It’s orientation is within 0.06° precise to our current geo pole, and shows a mathematical knowledge which rivals those of today.

Did you spot the pyramid of Visoko? It’s in the middle of the picture. It’s perfectly oriented to the current North pole, and therefore younger than 110,000 years.

Pyramid at Visoko, Bosnia

Most scientists cannot believe that the pyramid of Visoko is actually a pyramid, but the orientation of these pyramids to the current geographic poles is so precise, that it is hard to believe it’s not a pyramid. Of course, if it is a pyramid it smashes the precious constructed paradigm to pieces. In fact, most people want to protect that.

If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck.

The odds are less than 1 to 500,000 for this combination to be coincidental:

  • appearance of a pyramidal structure,
  • orientation to the cardinals,
  • two perpendicular faces which are easily to spot from satellite images.

So, it is unlikely we are looking at a coincidental configuration of nature. Science is about facts, and the coincidences are too small to be just a mountain. So, keep on diggin’ guys!

This pyramid can be classified as after the Great Flood, because they are oriented to the current cardinals – our current geo poles. Osmanagić has profound evidence they are older than 10,000 years.

Finding Our Current Geo Pole: How Triangulation Works

The orientation of the pyramids of Giza and the pyramid of Ping of Han (one of the 12 oriented to current North) intersect at the current North pole. They belong to the same time frame.
This pyramid in China is oriented under an angle of 8 degrees (352 degrees) to Greenland.

Pyramids at Xian, China

This is a collection of serious pyramids which are anxiously protected by the Chinese government.

It are pyramids, that’s for sure. It took scientists many centuries to figure this out.

What are the Chinese afraid of? That we find out that our ancestors were smarter than we think, or they were skimming the earth ?

The pyramids in China are massively oriented in just a few different configurations:

It is not difficult to see that these pyramids were NOT pointed to the current geo North pole, but to Greenland. Were this pyramids built when Greenland was actually located at the North Pole?
  • Oriented to the current North pole;
  • Oriented at an angle of about -8° (to Greenland);
  • Oriented at an angle of about -14 to -15°

Why are they oriented like this? The precision of the ones which are oriented to the current geo pole is so precise that the other ones that were oriented towards to Greenland and further weren’t just coincidental orientations. It was clearly done to serve a specific purpose. Were they oriented to the ancient cardinals, a very long time ago? We will show you that was the case.

The 8 degrees oriented Chinese pyramids cluster on a massive scale to the same area as the pyramids of Latin America, and form a massive mathematical node. The odds for this node to be formed coincidentally are 1 to 20.4 trillion!

Orientation of Chinese Pyramids

These different orientations of the Chinese pyramids imply that this culture might have survived a shifting geographical pole. Crustal displacements moved the geographical North pole on Greenland to its current location. Greenland moved to an area where it would start to melt very slowly.

There are pyramids in China that were built before the Great Flood and after the Great Flood. This cultures somehow survived it, adapted to it, and built another series of pyramids oriented to the new, current geo pole.

This would mean that the ones oriented to the current North pole are of the same time frame as the ones of Giza, younger than 110,000 years. But the other ones oriented under an angle of 8° are therefore older than 110,000 years.

Is this why this culture is so advanced in medicine, religion, philosophy and many other areas, because it’s so old and the traditions survived the Great Flood?

The whole perspective becomes more interesting when we go to Mexico.

Locations of Some Chinese Pyramids

Oriented to Current Pole (0°)
Oriented to Greenland (8°)
34°23’53″N / 108°42’44″E
34°21’48″N / 108°37’51″E
34°23’26″N / 108°44’21″E
34°21’43″N / 108°38’26″E
34°24’03″N / 108°45’53″E
34°20’18″N / 108°34’10″E
The pyramids of the Moon (topleft) and the Sun (bottom) at Teotihuacan. They are oriented to Greenland as well.

Pyramids of Teotihuacan, Mexico

One of the most important aspects of scientific evidence is that it is reproducible and verifiable.

When we draw a line from the pyramids in China (oriented at 8°) and the pyramids of Teotihuacan in Mexico, the lines will intersect each other on Greenland. This is reproducible and verifiable by anyone who has access to Google Earth. The question we could ask ourselves: what could this mean?

Read in this case the article “Why is Greenland Covered in Ice?” again, and the penny might drop that the pyramids of Mexico and these ones of China are both constructed before the Great Flood. These pyramids were built when the North pole was still on Greenland, and that is a very long time ago.

The crust appears to shift like Hapgood suggested but in another way, that is to say only latitudinal.

The cultures that built these pyramids are much older than we ever imagined possible. But that would explain a lot, wouldn’t it?

How Teotihuacan and Pyramid Wu of Han Intersect at Greenland

The orientation of the pyramids in Mexico and China intersect each other exactly on the former North pole on Greenland. This is one of the former geo North poles. By using this method 4 former geo poles are proven.

Verification Data of Intersection Point

Pyramid
Location
Angle
China (Wu of Han)
34.338° N / 108.5695° E
352° (360-8)
Mexico (Sun Pyramid)
19.695° N / 98.845° W
15.3°
Intersection Point
73.546°N, 043.837°W

The More Intersections, the More Proof

Just a few intersections like shown above proves nothing. It could be just luck. To rule out any coincidence, the data of about 500 ancient constructions and sites are examined and extensively processed. The results are staggering. It smashes all believes about the ancient past in relation to the Earth to pieces.

Since there was already a hunch that Greenland was once located on the North pole, we drew a line over Greenland from the current North pole to the current South pole, at a longitude of 45°W, and calculated roughly the amount of intersections with that reference line. Later is the process the exact longitude of this line was calculated to be at a longitude of 47.1°W. The results along this line were much better.

Former geographic poles reveal themselves sharply at a few locations on Greenland. The probability of this event can be calculated by using the binomial formula. With the used data set, and with the amount of found intersections, the probability on mere chance is less than 0.000000001%. The probability that it was done on purpose, and that it was therefore the former geographic North pole is certain for more than 99.999999999%.

In scientific terms: we can be sure this is true, which has a very deep impact. As you will see, a puzzle starts to fall into place. You won’t find a research that can outperform this outcome.

The Earth’s crust has shifted in the past, when the civilizations who built the pyramids were already present. We are not speaking of a few thousand years ago. We are speaking of periods of hundreds of thousands of years. It’s all in the numbers, and cannot be refuted nor debunked by anyone.

The Earth Crust Has Shifted Multiple Times in the Past

We can safely claim that Greenland was on the North pole, without having any geological knowledge or evidence. We don’t even have to go anywhere. We don’t need to walk on pyramids, or on glaciers, or to be a specialist in any of these areas. We even don’t need a shred of ‘evidence’. We can now understand why Greenland is melting, and why we find so many mysterious sites around the world, and why the cultures were vanished.

In the book that is currently in the making under the working title “Atlantis is Here”, the location of this intersection line has been calculated at a precise location of 47.091°W, for the ease of communication 47.1°W. It is in this article too far fetched to explain how this figure is accomplished but the results from the calculations along this line deliver even more amazing insights.

The book won’t expose you, like scientists love to do, to intimidating mathematical equations which forms the basis of this new theory. But if you are interested in it, there will be extensive appendices in the book dedicated to the mathematics behind it together with tons of data.

Reference Line to Measure the Amount of Intersections

When we examine the amount of intersections with the North-South line, we find the former North pole. For the book “Atlantis is Here” the line has been calculated at 47.091 degrees. It delivers 100% proof. Mathematical proof.
 

© 2015, 2016 by Buildreps

Why the Orientation of Pyramids Correlates to Ice Ages | Source

 

Teotihuacan: How Old Is It Really?

Teotihuacan is colossal, but no one has an idea who built these pyramids. | © 2016 by Buildreps

Facts About Teotihuacan

Teotihuacan is massive, and no one knows who built it. That’s directly one of the most pressing facts.

There’s already enough said and written about Teotihuacan, so it is pointless to repeat it all over again. There are enough sources to consult. This article will deal with Teotihuacan in a totally other way. A mathematical way.

To get to the core of this impressive giant, it’s necessary to separate believes and assumptions from the facts. The fact it that we actually know nothing about Teotihuacan. Therefore is there not much to say about Teotihuacan what not has been said by mainstream media.

The only thing that can be done is to measure, and to process the data mathematically, and to see what comes from that.

Teotihuacan Before Restoration

Teotihuacan before it was restored. Who even knows this today? It looked like a natural hill. The site had to be unearthed like most other Mesoamerican sites, before it was opened to the public. It took 75 years to restore.

Believes About Teotihuacan

There’s a lot of hocus pocus around Teotihuacan, and that’s logical because no one seems to know really something about it. That creates all the space to speculate.

Archaeologists, scholars, and historians tell their usual Mythos stories how things must have gone, while their stories are nothing more than a long chain of irrational assumptions. Intuitive people know better, but they seem unable to escape the realms of mysticism.

The only thing we can be sure of is that Teotihuacan will remain a mystery forever. Some mysteries cannot be solved in such way that it will be accepted by all of us.

What is Real Science?

When you want to enter the terrain of real science:

  • your ideas must be verifiable to anyone.
  • your ideas must be accessible to anyone.
  • your ideas must be presented in a language understandable for anyone.

When was the last time we were able to verify the data and interpretations from archaeologists and historians? I haven’t seen anything yet, except conservative ideas that came from brooding back rooms.

The ‘blind men elephant’ test is how sensing thinking types (which most scientists are) would describe an elephant as a whole when they are blindfolded.

Typical Paradigm Problems – the Nampa Figurine

A paradigm is a kind of framework in which a trained professional tends to think and tends to solve encountered problems.

Think outside the box is often said in management trainings. How well can scientists think outside the box?

What to do with the mysterious figurine, called the Nampa figurine, drilled up from a depth of about 300 feet?

Geologists say these layers are 2 million years old. Archaeologists say that is impossible. Aren’t contradictions a sign of falsehood?

So, what do we do now? Science is deafening silent. Oh yes, there are some noisy extroverts on sites like badarchaeology.com. In their attempt to debunk this figurine they make a big mess of geology, drilling engineering, and human intelligence as a whole.

With the same kind of logic we could claim dinosaurs alive just a few thousand years ago. That happens when science tries to debunk mysteries, it then undermines its own paradigm, and pollutes its own nest. The best policy is therefore – stay silent. The establishment literally hates the truth.

Science is humanities best attempt to describe reality. But there are many reasons to reject many mainstream theories, especially when it comes to our ancient history. There’s simply too much mystery that’s left unexplained or simply ignored, because the paradigm doesn’t allows it to.

Truth is so obscure in these times, and falsehood so established, that, unless we love the truth, we cannot know it.

— Blaise Pascal

Note: the genius Pascal said this already 400 years ago. What reason is there to think it got any better?

Why is Teotihuacan so Differently Oriented?

The pyramids of Teotihuacan belong to the biggest on the planet. The pyramids of Giza are very accurately oriented to the current North pole. This way of orientation is called cardinal orientation. The cardinals are the wind directions North, East, South and West.

Why is Teotihuacan not oriented in the same way as the ones of Giza? Teotihuacan and Giza have even some similarities, like arrangement and the dimensions of the base. There are people who have created amazing complex theories to explain why Teotihuacan is oriented in this strange way.

They have obviously forgotten about Occam’s Razor, which perfectly states that a theory with the least assumptions is most likely to be the correct one. Only people who hate the truth will claim that Occam’s theory is wrong.

Is there a hidden Pyramid code encrypted in Teotihuacan? Why is Teotihuacan so typical aligned? There are many new things discovered about Teotihuacan in relation to Giza by using this brand new theory.

Teotihuacan is built under an angle of about 15.5 degrees in regard to the geographical North pole. The reason why this is done has never been solved, until now. | © 2016 by Buildreps

Teotihuacan Was Once Oriented to An Ancient GEOGRAPHIC North Pole

When we look how the pyramids of Giza are oriented, there’s no sufficient reason to assume that Teotihuacan would be oriented in another way.

There are striking similarities between the two pyramids, like the size of their base and their typical arrangement.

It is in fact very simple. Teotihuacan was once oriented to a geo North pole on Greenland. Or better, Greenland was once at the North pole, because of serious crustal shifts. And that was a very long time ago. No, it’s not about the magnetic pole, it’s about the geographic pole. It appears to be shifting once in a while.

The odds that this is NOT true is a whopping 1 to 209 trillion.

It gets even more amazing once you have found the location of this former geo pole. The distance from Teotihuacan to its pole, and the distance from Giza to its pole, that’s our current geo pole, happens to be exactly the same. Coincidence? Again? No. Teotihuacan was built at exactly the same latitude as Giza – 29.9792°.

With this knowledge we are able to reconstruct the deformation of the crust due to the crustal displacements. By using the whole matrix of about 500 ancient structures spread around the world, we were able to reconstruct with advanced mathematics what really happened with the Earth’s crust over the last 400,000 years.

Teotihuacan Was Oriented to a Mathematically Proven GEO Pole

The analysis of the full dataset delivered spectacular results. The percentages are almost 100% and on top of that are the center latitudes of the hotspots corresponding with temperatures changes of the last glaciation cycles. The odds that the relation is purely coincidental is 1 to 750,000. How much more proof does one need?

How the Movement of the Geographic Pole is Proven

It is mathematically inconsistent to state that because Teotihuacan is pointing to ‘somewhere’, it is therefore a former North pole. This is not how mathematical proof works.

But when a massive amount of ancient pyramids and temples, all around the world (thus independently), are pointing to that same small areas to which Teotihuacan was oriented, we can calculate the probability of this event to occur.

Why is that? Because all these structures are independently oriented from each other, and therefore we can treat their orientation as an independent mathematical property.

It is simple and very powerful mathematics, impossible to escape from with statements like ‘coincidence’ or ‘it proves nothing’. This is what we call mathematical proof.

How this proof is delivered is extensively explained in other articles, and it irrefutably proves that the geographical pole moved, while there were already civilizations present on earth. Such an event wipes almost everything off the face of the earth. They are related to Great Floods. Note the plurality. Half a dozen civilizations were wiped away. Most evidence is gone or scrambled and jumbled, leaving one big mess behind. That explains a lot, isn’t it?

One could argue that the last crustal shift was 11,500 years ago when the last ice ages ended. Another one could argue it was 110,000 years ago, when the last ice ages started. I showed in former, related articles, it was the latter. Very sure. It faces science with again a major challenge: advanced civilizations roamed the earth much longer than scientists assumed. But of course, science is in its usual denial mode. The easy mode. The blind, dumb, and deaf mode. No veo por qué.

Science has to face immense errors in its core, and simply overlooks them or rejects proof of opposers by saying it is ‘pseudo science’. Who dares to argue against the power of mathematics? With evidence? Which evidence?

Teotihuacan Was Oriented to a Former Geo North Pole

Teotihuacan was once aligned to its geo North pole, when it was at another location. This was more than 110,000 years ago. The distance between Giza and the North pole = distance Teotihuacan to its former pole. That’s WHY they are closely related | © 2016 by Buildreps
 

Why Teotihuacan was Abandoned by its Builders

The most logical explanation is this: the ushering of a new ice age, which was in fact an earth crust shift, wiped away civilizations over and over again. It happened in the past, and it will happen in the future. The few people that remain after this catastrophe start to roam the planet looking for better places to settle.

Climatic zones have been shifted. The earth is in great turmoil with tidal waves, volcanoes, and mega-quakes. People had become low developed scavengers, warped back into their survival mode – the stone age.

When was the last time a new ice age started? It is estimated to be about 110,000 years ago, and lasted until about 12,500 years ago. That explains a lot, doesn’t it?

Species Seemingly Appear Out of Nowhere

The image, or the controlling paradigm as you might call it, is that scientists perceive a species coming from virtually nowhere. This specie, Homo sapiens, starts to migrate to the North. It is literally running after the shifted pole to the North.

When you look at the other side of the continent, like Russia, the species started to run to the South. It explains the massive amount of sudden frozen animals, like the mammoths in Siberia. The C14 dating completely fails when the latitudes were shifted. It’s a laughable attempt to carbon date anything when you deny crustal shifts. This bug will be fixed in the book “Atlantis is Here”.

It seems virtually that species arise from nothing, while they in fact originated from a high advanced race many thousands years before.

Scientists would say: there’s no evidence for this claim! Yes, there is. It are the structures that are abandoned and remain unexplained. They are mathematically proven to align massively to former poles. There’s in fact no way to get around this conclusion.

If structures like Teotihuacan remain unexplained there’s something fundamentally wrong in the way how evidence is gathered and interpreted. That is also for 99.99% sure, because the geographic poles are proven to be moving in relation to ancient civilizations a very long time ago. Denying that, is denying mathematical certainties like 1+1=2. There’s not a single scientist who dares to deny the power of mathematics.

The fact is that everything archaeology has done in the last century has to be revalued. The information that has been poured over the people through the mainstream media is proven to be completely worthless.

How Orientation Clusters Relate to Ice Ages

 

Teotihuacan was built between 240,000 and 270,000 years ago. The probability of this claim is higher than any other claim regarding the age of Teotihuacan. | © 2016 by Buildreps
This animation shows how the crust has been displaced in 4 stages over the last 350,000 years. The red dot represents the geographic North pole, i.e. the rotation axis of the Earth. The red dots become larger the older a geo pole is; this represents the amount of deformation of the crust. | © 2016 by Buildreps

How Old is Teotihuacan?

Teotihuacan is built between 240,000 and 270,000 years ago. The top structure might have been renovated by the many peoples who have occupied the city, but the foundation never changed its orientation.

It is said in the Sumerian tablets that an extraterrestrial species, called the Anunnaki (and Nephilim), came to earth around 450,000 years ago. How coincidental. Sumerian structures like Zabala, Nineveh, Eridu, and Sippar are oriented to a small area, a hotspot, that can be interpreted as one of the very ancient poles. About 450,000 years ago. Together with structures in Peru like Túcume, Huaca del Sol, Huaca del Luna, Caral, and Ollantaytambo that are also oriented to the same hotspot we have found the cradle of our civilization. We didn’t originate from one place, but from a few places around the world.

The orientation of the foundation is the most sure thing there is. It never lies. It is the foundation of the new truth.

Were we once created as a slave species by the Annunaki? Oh boy, that explains a lot. It’s all true, folks, it’s all true. Most of these Youtube channels about the Anunnaki, Nephilim, Gods from the Sky are more right than they know. In fact they are spot on.

This and much more will be published in the book “Atlantis is Here” that might, metaphorically speaking, shift your paradigm in the same way as the earth crust did. Note that the next crustal shift isn’t expected the next 100,000 years. Forget the fear mongers and doomsday preachers that Earth will be destructed soon. We have tons of time to set things straight before we’re warped back into the stone age for the umpteenth time.

But we have to take back control over what science has been telling us. It is in general sensorial collected rubbish, and people believe it because doctor this or professor that says so. They have not a single clue. Mathematics is the only tool to get the truth back.

© 2016 by Buildreps

First published: March 12, 2016

Lost Civilizations and Earth Crust Shifts

Life is fragile, and in the same time indestructible. Huge catastrophes swept away life on Earth many times. Gravity and motion are the main drivers of life on earth, but also the main cause of death and extinction.

The Theory of Earth Crust Displacements

After reading the title, you might ask “do we have earth crust displacements then?” The answer on this question will be given in this very comprehensive, and maybe from time to time tough article.

The theory of earth crust displacements has been dumped into the corners of pseudo science in the early 60s after Wegener’s theory of plate tectonics was confirmed by evidence found on the ocean floors.

Professor Charles Hapgood claimed that the earth’s crust, which is relatively thin and light (part of the lithosphere), could shift over the hot, molten magma layer (astenosphere) on which it is believed to be floating.

It was later said by scientists that there is no force strong enough to make such radical movements of the crust possible, and that only the very slow tectonic plate movements forms the earth’s crust, and thus the climatic events.

Solar heat at high latitudes is reduced in two ways: light travels a longer path through the atmosphere AND the incoming light is spread over a larger surface.

The Ruling Theories Result in Too Many Contradictions

At first hand seems the current ruling scientific view viable for most of the phenomena we witness on earth.

The geological record provides irrefutable evidence that dramatic climate fluctuations have occurred throughout our planet’s history.

But only when we allow ourselves to look deep enough, we see too many contradictions and illogicalities.

When we look deeper we will find phenomena that make radical movements possible, which is a scary idea, but there’s no indication it will happen soon.

Charles Hapgood delivered a lifetime achievement with his book Earth’s Shifting Crust – A Key to Some Basic Problems of Earth Science. His book is interesting to read, written in simple language. Sometimes is his style a bit wordy, but never without tons of data to backup his theory. On the other hand seems his style necessary to lead you out of the ruling paradigm. To show how things really are.

Geological evidence suggests that the climate had very mild periods, virtually from pole to pole. But how is that even possible when the sun is considered to be the only heat source? How can the sun heat the poles? This idea seems to be only possible when the earth would be heated from within, through convection.

Hapgood’s conclusions show enough reasons to do profound research on this issue, to find the truth.

The eccentricity of the last ice age, more than a thousand miles off, is shouting for a rational explanation, while science is having a party about carbon caused global warming. | © 2016 by Buildreps

Radical Changes Require Radical Forces or Vice Versa

While reading Hapgood’s book, you become convinced that earth crust displacements are the only credible explanation for many phenomena like:

  1. the sudden waxing and waning of glaciations,
  2. the eccentricity of recent ice caps in relation to the geo poles,
  3. that Greenland was about 450,000 years ago really green, and covered in rich flora,
  4. the sudden extinction of flora and fauna,
  5. the sudden emergence of new species.

Hapgood’s treatise is much more detailed and profound then just the few actualities shown here. His style of research was original, intelligent, and very controversial. You can also call it out-of-the-mainstream ideas.

Ice depositions grow usually centric around the pole, unless a phenomena like the Warm Gulfstream makes it acentric like you can see on the North pole in March. | © 2016 by Buildreps

Why the Eccentric Ice Age Requires an Explanation

When we look at the North pole in March, we see that the Warm Gulfstream warms the whole region denoted by N3, and partially N2 and N4. The Gulfstream is very powerful.

What would happen when there wasn’t a Warm Gulfstream present?

The ice formation around the pole would then become almost symmetric, and the Greenland Sea and Northern Atlantic would be completely frozen in Winter.

One could try to argue that during the last ice age there must have been a Warm Gulfstream along the coasts of Alaska and Eastern Russia, pushing itself through the Bering Strait, making this ice formation around the pole acentric. But the seaway between Alaska and Russia is far to narrow to pass through a Gulf Stream large enough to cause such a large asymmetry. The Bering Strait had to be at least 8 times wider.

It is crucial to understand that energy always flows from high to low, and not vice versa. The Warm Gulfstream is running in that region because it is a consequence of the second Law of Thermodynamics – restoring an energetic imbalance after a crustal dislocation. This process is still running today – the melting of Greenland.

The Warm Gulfstream will decrease in intensity after the situation at the North pole is returned to normal, and that is after the Greenland ice sheet is almost completely molten, which will still take about 4,000 years.

The amount of incoming solar energy at the poles depends strongly on latitude AND season.

Why Science is Not Always Rational

One of the most serious dilemmas in Palaeontology is that Antarctica once had abundant flora and fauna, already 150 million years after the splitting up of Pangaea.

Science tells us that Antarctica was at its current location at that time. This leads us to the question: where was the solar light coming from to make this abundant lifeforms possible? Mirrors in space maybe?

No, scientists came up with an even more ludicrous theory.

During six months there is hardly any solar light on Antarctica. The Milankovitch cycles are much too weak to explain anything regarding this issue (making the South pole lightly turn to the sun).

Scientists came up with the idea how trees and plants must have adapted to an almost complete lack of sun light. Hm, without photosynthesis? How?

Why don’t we see this adaptation happening today? Why do we still have taigas, tundras, and steppes and no tropical rain forests in Northern Siberia or Alaska? Or why don’t we see any trees growing on top of the Himalayas?

What we see happening here is that if one possibility is moved from the scene – crustal dislocations – they are replaced by the only left possibility – plants growing without solar light. These are irrational, unreliable, and adhoc theories. The tragic is that the general public believes these fantasies as to be true, which are broadcasted by the mainstream media, inflated with beautiful animations, like fairytales for adults.

There is no other way to explain these facts than with crustal dislocations.

Why Two Theories MUST be Combined

Hapgood’s ideas were immediately dismissed after discovering the mechanics of plate tectonics, because it could possibly explain in one blow:

  • the formation of ice caps on India, China and Africa during the Pagaean period,
  • abundant tropical rainforests where now the Sahara desert is,
  • the tempered climate, even sub tropical flora found once on Antarctica,
  • the subtropical flora found once in Siberia,
  • geological evidence of seasonal changes, everywhere, in different layers, which proves the existence of climatic zones through earth’s history.

What geology then tends to forget is that this is only a possible explanation if the Pangaean continent moved over the globe as a whole. How could there otherwise have been ice caps formed on Africa, China and India when Pangaea was still one continent? There is in fact no way to get around the subject of crustal dislocations.

Moreover, the very slow processes of plate tectonics don’t account for the radical phenomena 1 to 5 mentioned in the previous paragraph. There is no other way to explain all phenomena with two theories:

  • Slow plate tectonics
  • Radical crustal dislocations

But saying the words “earth crust shifts” in a geology class is like swearing in a church. It has similarities with saying “revolution for the people” during a meeting of the conservative tea party. This may and cannot exist!

The Pangaea Theory.

More About the Pangaea Theory

The Pangaea theory was devised to explain how species migrated between the different continents.

Alfred Wegener, who was the (official) founder of the idea, saw that continents once could have fitted into eachother, like you can see on the photo on the right. It is believed to be 250 million years ago.

It is thought to be a cyclical event. Meaning, there could have been more “Pangaeas” before this one.

It is a simple, visually based theory that comes at hand, for the palaeontologists, to explain many things, like in this case the migration of species. Geologists later confirmed the theory after finding fault lines on ocean floors, driven apart by forces from within earth.

Why the Pangaea Theory is Incomplete

The theory tells us that Pangaea started to break apart, but not why and how it broke apart. A theory that lacks to explain why or how it happened is incomplete.

The theory can also be used at will. For example, it explains how different species could spread over the continents. But it can also explain why we find similar dolmens or pyramids on every continent, or name any other similar cultural phenomenon. Why is that? Because humans could spread all over the world and built their stone structures when Pangaea was still intact?

But because Pangaea was 250 million years ago, it is then dismissed as impossible. Which is using a theory according to whether it suits the inventors. This shows an inherent falsity at the core of science, which might be caused by the compartmentalization of science. Spreading of species is explained, while spreading of cultural similarities remain unexplained.

When the spreading of dolmens and pyramids all over the world is regarded as coincidence, why can’t we then regard spreading of species around the world as coincidence?

Continental drift is a fact, but Pangaea is an idea that cannot be verified by evidence or by any mathematical model. It is an immature visually based idea.

The Framework for Any Glaciation Theory

Hapgood mentions in his book, William Lee Stokes, a well known geologist and palaeontologist, who provided a framework that every theory has to meet when it wants to explain glaciations. A theory that neglects one or more items on this list can be regarded as unviable or incomplete.

  1. An initiating event or condition.
  2. A mechanism for cyclic repetitions or oscillations within the general period of glaciation.
  3. A terminating condition or event.
  4. It should not rely upon unprovable, unobservable, or unpredictable conditions when well-known or more simple ones will suffice.
  5. It must solve the problem of increased precipitation with colder climate.
  6. The facts call for a mechanism that either increases the precipitation or lowers the temperature very gradually over a period of thousands of years.

Hapgood believed that the theory of ice deposition at the poles could make the crust shift. Maybe it can play part in an increasing imbalance of the crust, but it cannot be the main cause of crustal dislocations. Why not?

Hammer throwing is a good example where eccentric forces are used to move an object from A to B.

Why Ice Deposition at the Poles Cannot Cause Large Crustal Dislocations

Asymmetrical ice depositions around the poles cause theoretically very large tangential pointed forces.

Since earth is a sphere, these eccentric forces can theoretically, when they occur around the poles, and are large enough, shift the crust (lithosphere) over the syrupy magma layer (asthenosphere).

Hapgood believed that the last ice ages at the Northern hemisphere caused the earth crust to shift. This idea was also formed after looking at the growing eccentricity on Antarctica.

But Hapgood’s theory is deeply conflicting in itself, and seems to contain a circular reasoning:

A) If we look at the ice sheet during the last ice age, with the idea that the geo pole was where it currently is, we see a very large eccentricity (see illustration above). This large eccentricity could be, according to Hapgood, responsible for a crustal shift.

B) But how came this pole from Greenland to its current location? Because we cannot seem to solve this large eccentricity other then positing the thesis that the pole was on Greenland a priori, which has been proved by mathematics by now.

C) How could it then cause a crustal shift? Because the eccentric forces were neutralizing eachother when the pole was on Greenland.

D) How can it be that Antarctica was moving to the geo pole? It was then making a counter movement, and proving that the contrary was happening.

Milankovitch Cycles – A More Consistent Clue

Without any doubt was Hapgood right about radical, violent crustal dislocations. But his theory was incomplete, and moreover, it simply ignored many contemporary, clearly proven theories.

Milankovitch, for example, discovered already in the 1920s that the orbital cycles – eccentricity, obliquity, and precession – seemed to be in accordance with glacial cycles.

This lead to a typical ‘short circuit’ theory that the Milankovitch cycles in itself were responsible for the ice ages, although science still very poorly understands why Milankovitch’s cycles influence the climate on earth.

A Large ‘e’ Stands For Large Annual Gravitational Swings

The larger the eccentricity becomes, the larger the gravitational changes become. These fluctuations ‘massage’ the earth, causing heat to accumulate in earth’s interior. | © 2016 by Buildreps
 

Why Eccentricity is the Main Key to Understand Glaciations

The only factor in the Milankovitch cycles that seems to influence the amount of received solar energy is the changing eccentricity of earth’s orbit.

A sphere, which the earth is, doesn’t receive less energy when it is tilted or when it wobbles in any way. It still receives the same amount of solar energy. Eccentricity seems then to be the only key left to explain glaciations.

And even this phenomenon, when regarded over a period of one year doesn’t show changing incoming solar energy. Why not? Because the average distance to the sun doesn’t change over one year. The Aphelion a(1+e) and the Perihelion a(1-e) always result in 2 × a, meaning that the net result of collected solar energy over one years stays the same. And since glaciations cover periods of tens of thousands of years, there’s no way to explain how the amount of incoming solar energy ever can change.

We can easily see there’s a huge dilemma here, because the curve fittings of the Milankovitch cycles and glaciation cycles show a perfect match, although no one is able to explain them as explained above.

But when we allow ourselves to look deep enough we can see the logic behind this mechanism. But we must leave all the mainstream ideas behind us.

Temperature Proxies (δ18O) and Eccentricity

D18O records found on the ocean floors are a very good proxies for temperature indicators of the past. The similarities between D18O and eccentric orbit is crystal clear. C=cold, W =warm. | © 2016 by Buildreps

What is the Relation Between δ18O and Eccentricity?

The δ18O samples (Foraminifera shells) taken from the ocean floor serve as very good temperature indicators. It is not difficult to overlook the similarity of patterns between the two curves. The curves have to be well superimposed to make the similarities clear.

We see that the highs of the red curve correspond to the lows of the black curve.

δ18O is somewhat tricky. Low values stand for high temperatures and vice versa.

The explanation behind this mechanism can be explained as: If the eccentricity of earth’s orbit around the sun runs above a certain value, the temperature proxies start to drop radically (temperature goes up).

But why? Since the annual solar energy doesn’t change, it remains a mystery.

What Paleontologists measured was not the real temperature, but the proxy of that temperature. When the proxy (the shells) were moved from one region (latitude) to another, this is not visible, and could easily be misinterpreted as a temperature change.

What in fact happened is that the crust shifted as a response to the increasing tidal forces that were an effect of a large eccentric orbit. The proxies reacted on that crustal shift. A change in latitude means a change in temperature.

This possibility has always been ignored by both geologists and paleontologists.

Another Proxy – δD and Eccentricity

The relations between eccentricity in earth’s orbit and glaciations are clear, although there are some pattern breaking events as well that also requires an explanation. | © 2016 by Buildreps

Another Proxy

Another proxy from the ice cores of Dome-C on Antarctica shows the same kind of pattern, although this proxy works different, it also relates to temperature change.

We see that the highs of the red curve correspond to the highs of the blue curve.

It is clear, and not very difficult to verify, that the eccentricity of earth’s orbit triggers an event that is interpreted by scientist as a glaciation, while it was a crustal shift.

It is not unthinkable though that a large eccentric orbit ‘massages’ earth’s interior more strongly, so that the earth starts to warm up from the inside. Convection from the inside might warm the crust a little. It can also make the syrupy astenosphere more fluid, which might cause the crust to ‘moonwalk’ over the magma, under influence of a large tidal oscillation. One thing is sure – science really has to get to work, and stop this silly whining over carbon induced warming.

The smaller temperature changes in between the large peaks can be easily explained by many less impactive events like solar activity, Heinrich events, changes in ocean circulation, etcetera.

Additional Effects – Annual Extreme Weathering

Because the earth axis is tilted a large eccentricity has profound effects on temperature changes. | © 2016 by Buildreps

Why These Extremes Cause Crustal Shifts

When the eccentricity of earth’s orbit increases, it doesn’t influence the annual amount of received solar energy, but it does influence gravitation between the earth and the sun significantly.

  1. The larger the eccentricity becomes, the larger the temperature differences over one year. To understand the effects, look at deserts – hot at daylight, cold at night, resulting in erosive, rock splitting conditions.
  2. Depending of the tilt and precession during an extreme eccentricity, some parts of the globe are subjected to more extremes than other parts. Resulting in local expansion (heating) and local contraction (cooling).
  3. The closer earth gets to the sun, the harder the sun is pulling. This causes extreme tidal effects.
  4. Earth’s rotation varies with the distance to the sun, which in extreme cases, like with our moon, can even result in tidal locking. This effect generates much internal heat, because earth is not one chunk of rock but consists of layers, solid and fluid. This effect is, even today, very poorly understood by modern science.

Ironically seems this latter effect to be the main driver of crustal dislocations. Once the tidal forces are large enough, the lithosphere is able to break loose from its syrupy under layer.

This phenomenon might also trigger dislocations of the outer (liquid metal) core, a phenomenon that we currently witness as a wandering magnetic pole.

How Earth’s Rotation Currently Varies

The annual variation in rotation speed is the result of the current eccentricity of earth’s orbit around the sun. It is 2 milliseconds per year.

Current Fluctuations of Earth’s Rotation

The graph above shows how annually the earth’s rotation varies just a little bit. This variation is induced by the changing distance to the sun, which is also determined by the collective momentum of our entire solar system.

When the earth gets somewhat closer to the sun, the rotation slows down with about 2 milliseconds. When it moves further away, the rotation speed goes up again.

The overall loss in speed, visible in the graph by the overall downward trend, is energy that is transferred to the moon. The result is that the moon is slowly moving away from the earth, while increasing its rotational speed.

This coherent system is mathematically amazing complex, and still very poorly understood by science.

The variation in rotation speed seems very tiny, but it represents an amazing amount of energy: 9.93·1021 Joule [1]. The total global energy consumption in 2015 is estimated to be about 6.5·1020 Joule. This unnoticeable small fraction in Earth’s rotational variations is about 15 times more powerful than the total global energy consumption.

Sometimes you have to see things in their true perspectives.

[1]: Erot = ½·I·(ω12– ω22); I = 8.04×1037kg·m2; ω1 = 7.2934778604×10-5 rad/s; ω2 = 7.2934780297×10-5 rad/s

Earth’s Inner is a Composition of Layers

Earth’s solid inner layers are hydraulic connected by two liquid layers. The solid parts can move separately from each other when the tidal forces become large enough. | © 2016 by Buildreps
The Earth’s layered structure: 1=inner core (solid); 2=outer core (liquid); 3=lower mantle (solid); 4=upper mantle (syrupy); 5=lithosphere (solid); 6=crust (solid, part of the lithosphere)

Rotation Speed of the Earth Varies

Once you understand that the rotation speed of the earth partially depends on the distance to the sun, it is not difficult to see that this influences the force on the different shells of earth’s inner.

Many people regard the earth as one solid object, while it consists of three solid shells that are rotational connected to eachother by two liquid intermediate layers.

All three solid components will react differently to large tidal changes. This happens when the eccentricity of earth’s orbit is large.

Why?

Because their densities are very different. The inner core is very heavy, while the crust is very light. This results in different reactions to an eccentric orbit.

Eccentricity and glaciations are clearly one and the same.

The Ultimate Cause of Crustal Shifts

When the tidal forces are large enough, one or more of the solid layers can lose its connections with one of the liquid layers. This happens when one of the liquid layers is not able to transfer the momentum between one of the solid layers.

And this causes the earth crust to shift.

As with a spinning top, when a force is exercised in one direction, it will react perpendicular to that force. This is why we see that the crust has shifted mainly in latitudinal direction, and not in longitudinal direction. This is why Greenland was on the North pole as proved in the former articles.

The most inner core is solid and very heavy, it won’t react as fiercely to tidal fluctuations as the very light and brittle outer shell, the crust. The crust is connected to a tough syrupy asthenosphere that won’t loose grip that easy.

We are a fortunate species. The next peaks in the Milankovitch cycles are still very far away – in about 150,000 years is the next earth crust shift expected.

Science is currently unable to model anything that comes even close to show how this amazing complex process actually works.

More articles will follow on this issue, going deeper into this topic.

© 2016 by Buildreps

First published: March 2, 2016

Orientation of Pyramids to Former North Poles

Orientation of Ancient Structures to Current (geo) North Pole

There are many ancient temples and pyramids oriented to the current North pole. Of the 501 selected structures 68 of them are exactly oriented to the current North pole. How coincidental is that? | © 2016 by Buildreps
Tiwanaku is oriented to the current North pole under an angle of 359.8 degrees. There’s much debate about Tiwanaku and who built it.

Why Are Temples and Pyramids Cardinally Oriented?

There are many ancient structures, like pyramids and temples, around the world positioned in such a way that their footprint points precisely to the current North pole.

The majority of the temples and pyramids were built in the middle of nowhere.

Now what would you do when you’ve all the space to position a pyramid? Unless you’ve no idea what you’re doing, there’s only one logical answer to that question – you would orient it to the geographical poles. Why?

When you want to study and predict solar cycles, moon cycles, solar eclipses, equinoxes, earth’s motions (obliquity, precession, eccentricity of orbit), or any other phenomenon in the sky, you must point your instrument to the only sure point – the rotation axis of the earth. Which is the geographical North pole. If you don’t do that you will introduce another variable into the equations, which makes them much harder to solve. Pyramid builders were no irrational people.

But besides this, it also appeared that many other structures of importance are oriented to the geographical North pole without a clear reason. Pure symmetry between sunrise and sunset might have been one of the reasons. We simply love the sun for many different reasons.

This article is probably difficult for many readers. When you’re able to work your way through it, you might become aware how wrong our history is taught to us.

Earth crust shifts are real, and pyramids are much, much older. By using mathematics our real history reveals itself razor sharp

How Mathematics Proves Our History is Wrongly Interpreted

What does it mean when the majority of the pyramids and temples are not oriented to the current North pole? How likely is it then that they were oriented to former North poles? This can be sorted out by using the power of mathematics.

In this series of articles I will prove that the former (geographic) North pole was on Greenland. The structures that are oriented to this former pole are therefore older than assumed by archaeologists.

Why?

Because these pyramids from all over the world were collectively oriented to another geographic pole. And that was a very long time ago. We are here not talking about some few thousand years. No, we are talking about hundreds of thousands of years. Yes, you read it correctly. The foundations (!) of most pyramids are older than 110,000 years. The top layers might have been renovated many times – the orientation was left intact.

The claim is extraordinary, the proof is extraordinary as well. The mathematics behind the proof is extremely powerful, and will be published in a book that is currently in the making under the title “Atlantis is Here”. The title points to the fact that we are living in Atlantis right now. It’s everywhere around us, but we fail to see it. Our consciousness is dramatically failing.

How Two Separate Bearings Can Intersect With Eachother

Two boats sailing a steady course will intersect at a certain point. We can calculate this intersection point. When many sailing boats are intersecting at the same spot, would that be coincidence or artificially? The same principle counts for pyramid alignments. | © 2016 by Buildreps

Believe is Strong

Believe is strong. We believe that the history as it is taught to us is correct. Even when mathematics proves it is wrong, we tend to keep believing that the history as it is pounded in our brains is correct.

This is what we call conditioning. A conditioned mind has troubles to interpret outcomes of mathematics that deviates from the programmed believes. No matter how solid the proof is, we tend to fall back into our old believe of the trusty old thing. To get used to another idea takes time. Much time.

How Two Cardinally Oriented Pyramids Intersect at the Geo Pole

When two pyramids are pointing North, we can be sure they belong to the same time frame. We now know that this time frame is our current crustal position. | © 2016 by Buildreps
 
Borobudur is probably the most accurate oriented temple in the world under an angle 359.99 to the current North pole, which is an amazing achievement.

Temples and Pyramids Exactly Oriented to the Current North Pole

  • Lintong +12 other structures in China (pink line)
  • Borobudur on Central Java (dark blue line)
  • Angkor Wat +12 other structures in Cambodia (yellow line)
  • Konark Sun Temple in India (orange line)
  • Sri Rangam temple +1 other structure in India (red line)
  • Harappa in Pakistan (green line)
  • Bar’am +2 other structures in Israel (white line)
  • Pyramids of Giza and Temple of Horus in Egypt (green line)
  • Tiwanaku in Bolivia (purple line)
  • Naranjo in Quatemala +3 other structures in Mexico (light blue line)
  • Conimbriga (Portugal) and Lumbini (Nepal)
  • Three pyramids in Mexico, Mayapan and Ek’ Balam
  • 24 other structures around the world

Total: 68

The question is: What is the probability that 68 of the randomly selected global 501 (ancient) structures are coincidentally oriented to the current geographic pole? To be precise it is 1 to 2.45×1020.

What does that actually mean? It means that the orientation of a large amount of structures to the geographic North pole is NOT coincidental, hence it was done on purpose. Why? Because builders have simply a very strong desire to orient a structure to the cardinals, or they might have used the building as an instrument to measure sky phenomena.

Thus the orientation of these 68 temples and pyramids was done on purpose, and thus can we say with 100% certainty that the geo pole is where it is based upon these pyramids and temples. It is crucial to grasp this part. We can extend the same methodology to other ancient structures which are not cardinally oriented, and examine how they relate to each other. We appear to be able to distill former geographic poles from the orientation patterns. The very powerful mathematics behind it delivers 100% proof of former geographic poles.

Angkor Wat is oriented within 0.2 degrees to the current North pole.

Don’t Pick Just Some Buildings

When you want to prove a theory of this magnitude, it makes no sense to pick just some structures. No, the structures you must pick must be monumental, big, ancient, and perhaps religious of nature. Don’t pick just some random buildings, like the Notre Dame in Paris or some other cathedral somewhere.

But did you know that the Vatican is almost perfectly East-West oriented, and therefore oriented to the current geographic poles? Whatever the reason was, it seemed important enough to orient it this way in the middle of a crowded metropolis. The Vatican isn’t on the list however. It’s much too young.

Picking just some church in the middle of a town, proves nothing. The location of the sun and stars didn’t matter for them, let alone the North pole. The church had to be fitted in the spatial possibilities of the city at that time.

The criteria of the ancient sites:

  • ancient
  • square or rectangular,
  • the larger the better (= of more importance),
  • preferably isolated (= not influenced in orientation),
  • orientation is measurable.

Seemingly Criss-Cross Oriented

During the research there were four other orientation clusters found. An orientation cluster is an indication of a possible former geographic pole. But to be more sure about that conclusion much more research was done to verify this. You can read the other articles on this website to get a full picture on the theory.

Pyramids from all over the world are oriented to just a few locations that forms clusters on a so called NORTH-SOUTH reference line. This line is explained further on.

Some sites in Mexico comprise a large collection of pyramids that are criss-cross oriented as if they were just dumped down there.

But the chance that a few structures on one site cross other alignment cluster(s) is very, very small. It’s almost zero. But if that occurs, it means it was not accidental. It was engineered. 100% sure.

These sites can be interpreted as sites that were rebuilt after a catastrophe – a crustal shift. These structures can tell us an interesting story what might have happened in the past.

Measuring the orientation of a pyramid is never 100% accurate. You have to deal with a certain error. | © 2016 by Buildreps
 

The Accuracy of Measurement

We know where the current geographical North pole is.

So, we can measure in Google Earth the angle under which structures were constructed in relation to the geo pole. We can verify the accuracy of our measurements.

Archaeologists think they have verified things, but the fact is they’re completely groping in the dark, without even being aware of it. They are playing hide and seek.

The first thing you need to know is how accurately a structure can be measured in Google Earth.

Take for example the Great pyramid of Giza. We know it is perfectly aligned to the geo pole (within ±0.05°). So, we can verify our framework on this.

Experimental measurements on different parts of Giza showed that the average accuracy of measurement of Giza in Google Earth resulted in an error of ±0.20°. The pyramids of Giza are relatively easy to measure; the satellite photo’s are sharp and the basis of the pyramids are relatively clear.

Choosing the Error of Measurement

There are structures that are harder to measure accurately, because the satellite footage is blurry, or the angle under which the objects were photographed was not vertically (the baseline is then the most safe area to measure).

For some of these sites archaeological maps with a North arrow indicator were used as a cross reference to verify the outcomes of the measurement in Google Earth.

Experiments with measurements in Google Earth compared to maps of ancient sites showed a standard deviation of:

  • σ=68.2%: ±0.66° = ±0.5°
  • 2σ=95.4%: ±1.33°= ±1.1°
  • 3σ=99.7%: ±1.97°= ±1.5°

3σ (99.7%) was accepted as reliable enough for the calculations: ±1.5°. This also includes the error of measurement. Although Giza could be measured much more exact, only ±1.5° (total angle is 1.5+1.5=3.0°) was accepted as the standard accuracy for the whole project, and that counted for Giza as well.

Accumulation of errors can result in disasters.

Accumulation of Errors

When we intend to find former geographical poles, we have to be aware of the possible accumulation of errors, like:

  • When the pyramid builders established the geo pole many thousands years ago, they made a little error in their measurements. Even with our GPS systems today we have to deal with a potential error of about ± 15 meters.
  • When the pyramid builders constructed their pyramids, they again made a small error between their perception of true North and the actual orientation of the stones.
  • When we measure the pyramid many thousands years later, the position of the pyramid might have changed a little bit, due to geological processes, especially when earth crust displacements appear to be real.
  • When we measure the pyramid many thousands years later, we again make small errors in our measurements.

It is possible that all these errors cancel eachother out and nicely result in some perfection, but it is most likely that we’ll find an erratic pattern of ‘noise’. This noise is the build-up of the above mentioned errors.

We have to deal with these errors in a clever way.

When you measure ancient objects spread from all over the world, you will find a stunning result: mathematical proof that the earth crust has shifted on the rhythm of the Milankovitch cycles. | © 2016 by Buildreps

Probability That Giza Was Meant to Point North

The chance that one of the pyramids of Giza is coincidentally cardinally oriented is 1 to 30 (90÷3.0).

The chance that all three of them are coincidental oriented to the North pole is almost ZERO. To be exact: 0,0037% ((3.0/90)3 × 100%). So, Giza altogether was no coincidence.

The claim that all three were meant to be oriented to the current geo pole is 99.9963% sure.

The purpose, like with the orientation of the Vatican, is something totally different, and is open to any speculation, which even might differ from structure to structure.

Did you know that the White House is also exactly oriented to the geo poles? That also is done on purpose, although the reason why it is done might be unclear to us. But that shouldn’t hinder any research to the phenomenon itself.

When it comes to structures of power, it seems as if the geo poles are almost inescapable. Structures of greater importance seem to be oriented to the cardinals. When they’re not pointed to the geo poles, they were more or less subjected to their immediate surroundings, and that makes them of lesser importance.

When alignments are measured under a large angle, the error will remain small. | © 2016 by Buildreps
Measuring objects that are alignment under a small angle result in a larger error. | © 2016 by Buildreps

How to Define the Chances on Intentional Orientations

How to Define the Chances on Intentional Orientations

Most pyramids have four sides. Since we don’t know for sure the purpose of a pyramid we cannot discriminate one side over another. So, the angle in which it can be uniquely arranged is 90° (360°÷4).

With the average accuracy of ±1.5° in which we could measure the structures, there are within the angle of 90° 30 discriminating steps, which makes a standard chance of 3.33% in the defined framework that a pyramid is accidentally pointing to the North pole.

There are 501 measured structures in the database. Hence there’s a standard chance that 16.7 of the structures (501×3.33%) are pointing to the North. So, when we find 16 or 17 structures clustering within an area of 3 degrees along the intersection line we cannot derive a special status from that. But when this amount of random clustering exceeds for example 30 or even 40, the probability that it is coincidence dives rapidly towards ZERO. We can distill from these combinatorial patterns the ultimate proof that the crust has shifted and that pyramids are much older.

Of the randomly selected structures, there were 68 ancient structures in the database pointing to the current geographical North pole. Like already shown above the chance on mere luck is ZERO.

When another cluster of this magnitude shows up it is surely one of the former North poles, with a certainty of almost 100%. Let’s have a look.

How large is the chance that more 50% of all the alignments are running over Greenland, which is just 25% of a quarter hemisphere? When we’re trying to find another pole, is Greenland our best bet. | © 2016 by Buildreps

Finding the Other Poles

You can find former geo poles by following the orientation patterns of ancient structures, and calculate the probability that it actually is a former geo pole location. Just follow the patterns of pyramid orientations that are not pointing to the current geo poles.

But since we only know the current geo poles for sure, and we are not sure where to look, it is best to go from coarse to fine. If there are hints that the former geographic North pole might have been on Greenland, the first thing that could be done is looking for the amount of orientations that intersect Greenland as a whole.

The amount of (pyramidal orientations) intersections on Greenland is 224 of the total of 501. The probability for this clustering to occur coincidental is insanely small: 1.34-1869 %[2]. We can be 100% certain that the former North pole(s) was somewhere on Greenland. Or better, Greenland was once situated on the geographical North pole. We can claim this with 100% certainty.

We don’t know yet where to look on Greenland, but that can be done by following a simple logic. Going from course to fine is the best approach.

How? By connecting the pyramids by using an ‘independent intermediator’ – the intersection line. This line represents the rough path the pole took over the last 400,000 years.

[2]: n=501; x=224; p=0.24; q=0.76

Creating an Intersection Line Over Greenland

When we draw a vertical line towards the South pole at a longitude of 45 degrees, we can examine how many alignments intersect that line. The peaks in the graph show the most likely locations of the former poles. | © 2016 by Buildreps

Why Not Connecting Pyramids Directly

It happens often, especially on the internet, that people claim to have found a connection between ancient objects by drawing some lines between them. In most cases that means absolutely nothing, and we cannot draw any conclusions from it.

With 501 pyramids we can have (501-1)2 possible connections. That are about 250,000 intersection points. That would be an immense scatterplot with tons of useless noise in it. What conclusions could we draw from that? And why wouldn’t we organize the research logically at first hand?

We can find an intersection point between two of the most enigmatic pyramids on the planet, Teotihuacan and Giza. They intersect near Kongsfjord that lies in Northern Norway. We won’t find anything useful at that location. Furthermore, we don’t why pyramids and temples were “uncardinally” oriented in the first place.

This intersection point at Kongsfjord has not any significance whatsoever. We can connect absolutely different time frames to each other, but we cannot draw any conclusion from it. It is clear that we cannot just connect some pyramids onto each other, without using a well thought out reference – the intersection line.

The intersection line will lead us to groups of pyramids that we can safely connect to eachother, which leads us to a definitive location of a former pole. These pyramids all belong to the same time frame.

Former Pole Locations

The analysis of the full dataset delivered spectacular results. The percentages are almost 100% and on top of that correspond the latitudes vs temperatures eerie precise with the last glaciation cycles.

How Probability is Determined

On the reference line we found, for example, 64 intersections between latitude 70 and 73. The standard probability is between 22 and 23 intersections. We can calculate the likelihood that such a large cluster can be formed coincidentally by using the binomial formula.

  • n = number of trials = 501
  • p = probability of success = 0.04444 (4 degrees out of 90 degrees)
  • x = number of successes = 64

P(x) = 2.0×10-14 ≡ 0.000000000005%.

The probability that a cluster of this magnitude is formed coincidentally is 0.000000000005%. Conversely we can say it is artificial constructed. Why? Because the probability it was intentional is 100 – 0.000000000005 = 99.999999999995% ≈ 100%. All these randomly distributed ancient structures were clearly pointing to one location, and therefore a former geographic North pole, because the geo pole is the only transcending geographical feature wherever you are on the globe. There was no relation whatsoever between the randomly distributed pyramids around the globe, other than the location of the geo pole.

The same situation was emulated by using Monte Carlo simulations, which gave the same results. We can be sure this method expresses this situation correctly.

Intersection Clusters = Proximity of Former Geo North Poles

Latitude  
Intersections with 47.1W Lon line  
Probability Former Geo pole  
76.1°N
56
100%
71.5°N
64 100%
64.0°N
51
99.9985%
52.1°N
49
99.995%

Intersection Clusters on Greenland

Another thing that becomes clear when we look deeper into this issue; the older the cluster, the larger the area over which a dynamic group is formed. That sounds difficult, but it is really simple. The older the geo pole is where the pyramids were once oriented to, the more deformations the crust had to endure. Plates were apparently deformed and thus also the accuracy of the oriented groups of related pyramids. This mechanism shows itself in a larger spread of the oriented pyramid to this ancient geo pole. From this we are able to roughly recalculate the amount of deformation of the tectonic plates due to the crustal shifts.

Greenland went in a few steps over the North pole. It is possible to correlate the magnitude of the steps with the temperature proxies, δD or δ18O, respectively found in ice cores of Vostok and Dome-C (Antarctica). The similarities are clear. From this we can directly derive the time frames of the crustal shifts which are clearly related to the Milankovitch cycles.

In a series of next articles I will show you in an increasing detail what happened in our distant past.

© 2016 by Buildreps

First published: February 21, 2016

Why is Greenland Covered in Ice?

Greenland is covered with a massive ice sheet while Alaska, Canada and Russia are not. Why? ‘N’ is where the current North pole is located.

Why is There an Ice Sheet on Greenland?

Greenland is the largest island on earth, situated east of Canada, between the Arctic and Atlantic oceans. About 80% of the island is covered by the massive Greenland Ice Sheet with an average thickness of about 1,667 meters. If this ice sheet would melt completely off, the sea level will rise with about 7 meters (23 feet).

Drill samples have shown that the Greenland ice sheet is approximately 110,000 years old. Other estimates claim that the ice sheet is 400,000 years old. How did this ice sheet become so thick, while the surrounding countries with mountain ranges, like Alaska, Canada and Russia, have no ice sheet? Even Iceland isn’t fully covered in ice. Moreover is the exact age of the ice sheet unclear. What do we really know?

This article will explore this issue partially which will be published in a series of articles.

Whiteland or Greenland?

Where the name Greenland comes from, while it’s completely white, is unsure. But it is said to have come from early Norwegian settlers.

According to the Icelandic sagas, Erik the Red named it Greenland in an attempt to lure more settlers in search of land and the promise of a better life. It was maybe also a kind of incantation to make the cold island more livable.

Sages and legends often contain parts of some truth. The current scientific view is that Greenland was actually green some 450,000 years ago. That’s quite some time for a legend to bridge, isn’t it?

What happened to Greenland that it’s now covered with an insane thick icecap?

Why the mountain ranges on Canada, Alaska, Russia, and Scandinavia are not covered with a similar ice sheet as on Greenland has never been sufficiently explained. | © Buildreps 2016-2017

Models Say There Can’t be Ice

Greenland’s ice sheet has puzzled scientists for many decades, which have led to complete ridiculous, even unscientific theories. Geoscientists who are in the search for a logical and consistent explanation are limited by their own set of beliefs and institutions. This limitation leads sometimes to the strangest conclusions.

There have been many reports in the media about the effects of global warming on the Greenland ice sheet, but there is still great uncertainty as to why there is an ice sheet on Greenland at all.

There are mathematical models that cover Greenland with an ice sheet, but they also cover the other continents in ice as well. There’s no model possible that covers only Greenland.

What changed in Earth’s history to make this happen?

Latest Official Version

The reason for that [the ice sheet] is the interaction of three tectonic processes. For one thing, Greenland had to be lifted up, such that the mountain peaks reached into sufficiently cold altitudes of the atmosphere. Secondly, Greenland needed to move sufficiently far northward, which led to reduced solar irradiation in winter. Thirdly, a shift of the Earth axis caused Greenland to move even further northward.

The Fact is: There Are no Conclusive Models Found Yet

There are in fact several competing theories why Greenland is covered in ice, ranging from:

  • changes in ocean circulation,
  • the increasing height of the Rocky Mountains,
  • changes in the Earth’s orbit,
  • natural changes in atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations.

The University of Bristol, funded by the British Antarctic Survey, claims that none of the posited theories can account for the thick ice sheet of Greenland. Even the Milankovitch cycles are nowhere near strong enough to explain the ice coverage of Greenland.

While the results of the computations suggest that climatic shifts associated with changes in ocean circulation and tectonic uplift did affect the amount of ice cover, and that the ice waxed and waned with changes in the Earth’s orbit, none of these changes were large enough to contribute significantly to the long-term growth of the Greenland ice sheet.

Their conclusion was that the huge ice cap could only grow when Greenland would be “roofed” with a giant CO2 bubble covering the whole island. Of course, that sounds reasonable. How to transport all the vaporized seawater to Greenland without interfering with the CO2 bubble? How did that bubble came there? Which mechanism kept it in place for over hundreds of thousands of years? Not very scientific. These ‘brilliant minds’ are running the global warming show currently – a troubling idea.

In other words: none of the current theories appear to be valid.

Try to be honest to yourself. Everyone who has a good intuition sees immediately that it’s strange that on the Northern hemisphere only Greenland is covered with an ice sheet. Not just a bit of ice. A massive ice layer, while there’s nothing on Alaska, Canada and Russia.

Are Temperature Fluctuations Correctly Interpreted?

Earth’s temperatures have never been constant. But when the reference points are dislocated the interpretations are most probably false. Temperature change corresponds to the eccentric orbit of earth around the sun. | © 2016 by Buildreps

No Ice Sheets on Other Mountain Ranges

It isn’t a logical starting point in any case. The ice sheet around the Greenland Summit, that’s about in the middle of the sheet, is about 3,000 meters thick. The altitude is also about 3,000 meters. The mountains must have been pushed down how much? At which point are they trading places, or was it a slow sliding scale?

If that would be the main driver, why are there no fat ice sheets on the Brooks Mountain Range, the Innuitian Mountains, the Mackenzie Mountains, the Ural Mountains, the Central Siberian Plateau, and the Verkhoyansk range? Even the mountains on Svalbard aren’t covered in thick ice sheets.

Scientists will probably think of very difficult explanations for this, but they then tend to forget about Occam’s Razor. The simplest explanation with the least assumptions is the best theory.

Why no Ice Sheets on Alaska, Canada or Russia?

The latest official theory why Greenland is covered in ice, includes the assumption that Greenland was covered with high mountains. These high mountains were formed by tectonic forces pointed towards the location of Greenland. The relative thin crust was easier foldable which made the formation of mountains easier.

The mountain peaks would start to accumulate an ice sheet after Greenland shifted 18° further up North to its current location, according to this new theory. It cannot be stated clear enough that this is completely irrational science.

Why would only Greenland shift Northward? And the rest stays in place? Seriously?

Why this accumulation of ice didn’t happen in similar regions in Alaska, Canada or Russia, where the much colder land climate even more encourages the build-up of an ice sheet, remains completely out of the scope of this theory.

This theory seems to be rather adhoc because it doesn’t cover the complete subject of ice sheet formation around the Arctic.

Are Earth Crust Shifts Possible?

The late Professor Hapgood first coined the idea of Earth Crust Displacements in 1958, and even published complete books and theories around this issue. Hapgood also explained how crustal shifts were powered, namely that the deposition of ice around the poles caused eccentricities. These eccentricities cause a centrifugal force on the crust and could lead to shifts.

This view is though inconsistent, and not completely in line with what we see happening today at Antarctica. The centrifugal forces caused by the ice sheet on Antarctica today is about 2 times larger than the forces during the last ice age. We would be shifting as we speak. So, what could power crustal shifts is unsure, but it could be driven by a combination of inner and outer events.

The fact is that crustal shifts are the only possibility to cover Greenland with an ice sheet, and that we are now looking at the remains of crustal shifts. But to claim how this works is yet too early.

Never exclude anything in advance. Earth Crust Shifts must be part of the vocabulary of any sane geologist to explain events that otherwise become unexplainable. Looking for the cause of the event is yet another thing, which might be even much harder.

The formation of our world is not only done by one big crustal force, but at least by two:

  • Earth Crust Displacements
  • Tectonic Plate Movements

How Ice Forms Around the Poles

Ice has the natural tendency to grow and to melt approximately concentrically around the poles. This tendency is not influenced by any wobble, since this wobble still occurs equally around the geographical pole.

The ice sheet on Greenland shouldn’t be there if the geographical pole always had been were it is today. There is simply no scientific explanation possible without the introduction of a radical shifting mechanism of the Earth’s crust.

Understanding why the ice sheet was formed on Greenland helps us to understand the possible response of the ice sheet to future climate changes, and if the current climate change is completely wrongly interpreted.

Ice Formation is Concentric Around Poles

Ice forms concentric around the poles, unless there is a rational mechanism that makes it slightly acentric . | © 2016 by Buildreps
 

Why Ice Formation is Concentric

The North pole map at the end of the Winter shows a large amount of sea ice which is almost centrical formed around the geographical pole. In winter time, the sea ice in the Arctic ocean gets trapped between Canada, Russia and Greenland (N1), and forms a dense pack of sea ice. This pack of ice can’t go anywhere, while the ice between Greenland and Norway floats into the Greenland Sea and the Norwegian sea, and finally melts. The Gulf Stream plays a major role in this process.

This is the reason why on the North pole the ice is not as symmetrically accumulated as on the South pole.

When we look at Antarctica, we see that the sea ice around Antarctica can freely float away into the Southern part of the oceans, and is almost symmetrically formed around the geographical South pole.

The slight acentric accumulation of ice on the South pole is caused by the predominant ice mass in the sectors S2 and S3, which is a major chilling factor in the formation of local sea ice.

The former glaciation cycle was centered around Greenland | © 2016 by Buildreps

Was the Former North Pole on Greenland?

The center point of the last ice age was on Greenland. Greenland was located on the North pole due to crustal dislocation. That is the reason why only Greenland is still covered in ice. The reason why the ice sheet on Greenland is melting, is because it has been shifted about 1,500 km South, from its former polar position to its current position.

The ice sheet melts so slowly because Greenland still lies for a great deal within the polar circle. The outer edges of the sheet are melting much faster then the elevated centre near Summit. The overall balance is negative.

The only sure conclusion we can draw is that ice always forms symmetrically around the pole, unless there is a reason, a strong mechanism, that makes it asymmetric.

Which mechanism could have been strong enough to cause such an asymmetry during the last ice age? Now try to keep the explanations as simple as possible, without limiting yourself by your own paradigm.

That the former North Pole was located on Greenland can also be proved by calculations.

Milankovitch Cycles (W/m2 at 65ºN) Are No Cause of Glaciations

There is not a single relation between the Solar Insolation and the start of the last ice age. There is also not a single relation between the glacial maximum and Solar Insolation on the Northern Hemisphere. The fluctuation are much too weak to cause or to end an ice age.

Former Geographical Pole

Greenland was situated at the (geo) North Pole between 110,000 and 200,000 years ago. There’s even hardly any doubt about the location. The region of Greenland is in line with the orientation of about 224 ancient pyramids and temples.

That is no coincidence. There is about 1.34-1869 % chance (practically it’s 0) that an arrangement of this magnitude happens accidentally, which is a sure confirmation of something very significant. You have about trillions times trillions times more chance on winning the Power ball. Imagine that!

Our ancestors oriented their structures to a geo pole that appeared to be at that time at another location: Greenland.

This completely new theory explains in the simplest possible way why there is still a thick ice sheet on Greenland. This also explains why there’s even an ice sheet present, while there’s nothing of the ice sheet left on Russia or Canada.

The ice sheet gets thicker the closer we get to the pole. That is what we see on Antarctica today. The current North pole and the former North pole are shifted under an angle of about 14° in latitudinal direction. But the shift didn’t take place overnight. The shift took place over a period of about 50,000 years, between 110,000 and 60,000 years ago.

How the Melting Rate of the Ice Sheet Proceeds

The current location of Greenland makes the ice sheet melt at a very low rate. 99.9% of the melting energy is provided by the Warm Gulf stream. In about 4,000 years from now the ice sheet will be molten completely. In 2100 the sea level will have risen about 8 cm due to the Greenland melt alone. The estimated melting rates of the IPCC are heavily exaggerated  | © 2015-2017 by Mario Buildreps.

The Ice Sheet Will Wax and Wane

Of course will the ice sheet wax and wane a little bit from year to year, from decade to decade, or even from century to century. That’s because Greenland has moved to a part of the Arctic where the temperature’s yo-yoing around zero. But the overall picture is clear. It melts substantially, when measured over a period of a thousand years.

The melting energy comes for less than 0.1% from the airflow, and for 99.9% from the warm Gulf Stream. The Gulf Stream is present around Greenland to restore the balance after the balance disturbing crustal shift that took place between 110,000 and 60,000 years ago (the crust shifted average about 31.1m/year over a period of 50,000 years in the latitudinal direction). The ice sheet melts therefore from below, and hardly from above.

This melting mechanism has absolutely nothing to do with a greenhouse effect. The melting process is fueled by (the balance restoring) El Niño.

The temperatures of the elevated centre part of Greenland is always far beneath zero, while the lower outer edges of Greenland are nearly half of the time way above zero. To model this process is not so easy, even with the understanding what the origin (North pole) of ice sheet was.

If you would zoom in on the smooth graph above that presents a period of about 20,000 years you’ll find an erratic pattern. Climate sceptics will try to zoom in on parts of the erratic pattern and claim that the sheet is growing. That’s an obvious wrong interpretation of a long slow process.

The mass of the massive ice sheet of Greenland has pushed the land mass of Greenland down, leaving high mountain ranges around it. It created a kind of ‘open shop freezer’. The ice sheet has been trapped inside.

Original Thickness of the Greenland Ice Sheet

The fact that the ice sheet on Greenland is still melting, and the former ice sheets of the last glaciation on Russia, Canada and America are long gone, means that the ice sheet on Greenland must have been very thick.

The core temperature of the Greenland ice sheet was much lower as well, because it was situated at the North pole. The other ice sheets on Canada and Russia weren’t as cold as the one on Greenland. The immense thickness and the very low temperature of the Greenland ice sheet, combined with its current polar location (it’s still cold), makes it melt at a very low rate.

This ice sheet will melt anyway, whatever we do. Zero Carbon emission or much Carbon emission. No scientist has ever proven a that CO2 can cause a global temperature change of between 10 to 15°C. CO2 is a greenhouse gas, sure, but a very weak one, and is has been made responsible for something it is incapable of doing, which is very unscientific. CO2 is the effect, not the cause. CO2 lags behind because it is released by warming oceans and absorbed by cooling oceans, that’s why it lags behind on global temperatures changes.

Calculations, resulting in the graph above, show that the original ice sheet was 32% thicker when it lied on the North Pole, average around 2,200 meters thick. The thickest part of the ice sheet was centered around the pole, and was between 4,000 and 4,500 meters thick.

Rationality: Why Greenland is Covered in Ice

The Greenland Ice Sheet Will Melt In Any Case

The estimation of the IPCC concerning the current melting speed of the Greenland ice sheet are in line with the calculations based upon a shifting crust which took place between 110,000 and 60,000 years ago. Only with this difference that the origin of the ice sheet of Greenland has been determined, and that makes a world of a difference.

The extrapolations of the IPCC concerning the melting rate are exaggerated and based on too many unscientific assumptions.

The ice sheet won’t melt within just a few hundred years. There’s even not enough energy to change ice into water, called heat of fusion, within this short time frame.

When all ice on Greenland is molten into the oceans in about 4,000 years, it will influence the climate on earth dramatically. The risen sea level will influence all coastlines. The energy that was required to melt the ice sheet cannot go anywhere else than into warming the whole atmosphere and the oceans.

The Northern hemisphere will heat up, the Southern hemisphere will cool down. This is a logical part of earth’s balancing mechanism, otherwise it wouldn’t have survived billions of years. But how this exactly will work out is yet unknown.

Evidence for Earth Crust Shifts

Paleomagnetism delivers proof for crustal shift, although scientists may not even recognize it as such.

Scientists assume when they look at the samples of alleged magnetic pole reversals, that the magnetic pole was the only variable that changed, while there’s no way to tell from the samples what has changed – the magnetic pole or the crust. Because the magnetic pole obviously moves, it doesn’t mean the other variable, the crust, is obviously fixed. That’s an unscientific, assumptive error.

It was both that moved. And it can be partially fixed by using the orientation of ancient structures, which show us the way in which position the crust was over the last 400,000 years.

The penny still hasn’t dropped in many scientists that magnetic reversals are in fact evidence for Earth Crust Shifts. Only because we cannot simply solve two variables from just one equation, the assumption is conveniently made that it was only one variable – magnetic reversal. An error which is caused by intellectual laziness, lack of imagination, and a too low consciousness of geoscientists.

Even More Evidence

A next article shows the amazing orientation patterns of more than 500 ancient structures spread around the world. These 500 pyramids point to three different clear locations on Greenland.

And exactly at the same point that was already embraced by the ice sheets of the last glacial cycle. This doesn’t only show an amazing outlining of pyramids around the world, but also that these pyramids are much older than always assumed.

We can find the exact location of the Greenland pole by performing spherical triangulations with the orientation of ancient structures around the world. It has similarities with the way sailors used to find their way on the seas.

Is it Important to Know?

Why it is important to know that the former North pole was once on Greenland? Because this notion has a huge impact on the climate models, and even on the current weather models.

All models somehow try to explain the presence of the ice sheet on Greenland from its current position, and not from the position where it came from, and that the reason is why it is melting in the first place.

As long as the current climate models haven’t included the correct starting parameters, they will all be wrong in their long term predictions.

This is why it is important to know that the former North pole was on Greenland. This theme will be explained in an upcoming new series of articles together with the used data.

A shifting mechanism has serious implications for the Carbon dating method as proposed by Libby in 1947, since the biosphere is not as stable as always assumed. This dating method has become the standard dating technique for organic materials found around ancient sites. It is by definition unreliable when a crustal shifting mechanism is rejected.

But this dating method (the 14C) can be mathematically repaired when we remodel it with the correct parameters from i.a. the crustal dislocations in it. This is a monumental undertaking similar as the remodeling of the paleomagnetic data. But it has to be done to complete the whole picture.

This is why it is important to know, since the theory repairs our view on our planet and our history.

© 2015-2017 by Buildreps

First publication: 09 December 2015