Why Earthquakes Are Earth’s Heartbeat

All ancient cultures believed that Earth is a living organism. We seemed to have lost this idea. But if Earth is indeed a living organism it could have a heartbeat. Is there any evidence to find which supports this idea? Yes, it seems so.
Fig. 1: If Earth is an organism, it must have a heartbeat. Is it observable in any way?

Life Produces Life

Some people feel intuitively that Earth is a living being. Say for yourself, how can something which is dead sustain life? Wouldn’t that violate all logic? Many native peoples, like the Indians and the Aboriginals knew that Earth is a living organism. It appears as the years go by, and fundamental science progresses, we discover that most of what the natives had to say was actually true.

Opponents of that idea would argue that if we would travel to Mars, and grow plants on board of a spaceship, these plants would grow as well? After all a spaceship is a dead thing. If that would actually work, which we yet don’t know for sure, this plant life would be sustained by us, living beings, only with this difference that we’ve outsourced our care with technology which we’ve invented for that specific purpose.

These artificial plants will most probably be unable to reproduce themselves, i.e not able to produce fertile seeds, due to the genetic modifications to get these plants to grow in an artificial environment in the first place.

And one of the elementary key features of life is reproduction (note: the Moon is an offspring of the Earth). It could mean that artificial plants on board of a spaceship wouldn’t meet all requirements to be called alive. Maybe an interesting topic for a debate.

The basic argument is that something which is completely dead cannot sustain life. It’s hard to believe the Earth is not alive, and I will show you why it is alive with mathematics.

Earth and the Gaia Theory

Fig. 3: Lovelock’s shows in another way that Earth is alive.

The Gaia theory of James Lovelock proposes that organisms like plants, bacteria, animals, fish, etcetera form together with the inorganic substances a self-regulating system. All parts in this system work together to maintain the habitability on Earth.

All lifeforms on Earth are considered to be part of one single living planetary being, called Gaia.

The energy produced by the Sun, for example, has increased with 30% since the Earth is believed to be formed 4.5 billion years ago, but the temperature on Earth didn’t seem to have risen with 30%. How did Earth manage to keep its temperature steady? There must a very complex, active feedback loop at work on Earth, through an interactive collaboration between all organic life which includes the Earth itself.

What follows from the Gaia theory is that if Earth would work together with all the organisms on it, the Earth would be an intelligent organism itself. Like already said, how can a dead thing sustain life, and have an active feedback system?

The question is: if Earth is an organism, does it have a heartbeat?

Heartbeat in Relation to the Size of Animals

The heart rates of animals depend of their size, weight, and metabolism. This all boils down to basically the same thing: small animals have high metabolisms and low weight, and large animals have low metabolisms and high weight.

That results into a distinct relation between two characteristics weight and heart rate.

If Earth is a living organism, it could have a heartbeat. If so, at which frequency would it beat?

Heart Rates From Small to Large

Organism
Average Weight (Kg)
Average Heart Rate (beats per minute)
Mouse
0.025
670
Chick
0.05
400
Hamster
0.06
450
Rat
0.2
420
Rabbit
1
205
Rabbit 2
2
205
Chicken
1.5
275
Cat
3
120
Small dog
3.5
100
Medium dog
5
90
Monkey
5
192
Large dog
30
75
Human
80
65
Pig
150
60
Horse
800
40
Elephant
5,000
25
Blue Whale
125,000
8

 Graphical Representation

Fig. 4: Relation between weights and heart rates. Note: both X and Y-axis are logarithmic, which results into a straight line.

What Happens If We Extrapolate That Line?

The formula which is derived from the graph above can be used to calculate Earth’s theoretical heart rate.

  • heart rate (n/min) = 213.7 × weight(kg)-0.271

The Earth weighs 5.97×1024 kg. When we perform the math correctly it results in 1 beat per 42.2 years.

When we round that number to an integer according to the rounding rules we end up with: 42. Many people believe there is something magical with the number 42.

Some say that 42 is the ultimate number of the universe and the answer to everything. If that is really true will remain the question. Of all possible numbers we ended up with this number as the heart rate of Mother Earth, based on the heart rates of the organisms that live on it. An interesting observation and so a good reason to look deeper.

Fig. 5: The pattern of an electrocardiogram (PQRST) of a human has one major peak (R) and two minor peaks before (P) and after (T) the major peak. The T peak is always stronger than the P peak. Earthquakes show exactly the same pattern: the T earthquakes are always stronger than the P earthquakes.

The Heart Rate of the Earth

Earth’s alleged heart rate has similarities with Earth’s recurring earthquake history.

The two most heavy earthquakes over the last decades, Chile 1960 and Sumatra 2004, had 44 years in between them, which is close quite to the calculated 42.2 years. Would that be coincidence? Or are there more patterns to find that reinforce this observation?

Of all possibilities are both peaks (Chile and Sumatra) each others antipodes.

When we take a look at all significant earthquakes from 1900 till 2014 and convert them into an energy pattern, we see a more consistent pattern occur.

When we measure our own pulse, we do that at least during a longer period, and not just between two heartbeats, because heartbeat rates vary. So we have to measure over a longer period of time.

Another thing is, when we examine earthquakes over a longer period of time we’re seeing similar patterns as in an electrocardiogram of Humans. There’s a major peak (R), and two minor peaks before (P) and after (T) the major peak. The P is smaller than the T. Earthquakes follow a similar pattern.

An Electrocardiogram of the Earth?

Fig. 6: This graph shows an interesting pattern. We’re seeing that every very large earthquake (R = 1922, 1960, 2004) which has an average frequency of 42 years, is accompanied with a group of minor earthquakes. Are these the Ps and Ts like we see in a cardiogram? Another pattern we’re seeing is that the larger the earthquakes become the longer it takes to complete the PRT cycle. 

The Earth Shows a similar PQRST Pattern

Like already said, when we look at earthquake energy releases, we’re seeing similar peaks as in the PQRST cardiogram of a Human being. The large peak, the large earthquake, is preceded by a minor earthquake (P) and is also followed by minor earthquake (T). The T quake is in all cases larger than the P quake. This is also similar as in electrocardiograms of Humans.

The similarities are adding up. Is the Earth really alive? How does it react to nuclear tests and fracking operations? Probably not so well.

Showing a PQRST Pattern

Fig. 7: In this animation we’re seeing that earthquakes follow the same cardiogram pattern as that of Humans. The events follow always the same pattern: first a minor quake, then a large quake, followed by a quake of a strength which is in between the two. Note that because we have converged the earthquakes into energy (similar as in a cardiogram) to make the pattern more distinguishable, the quake of 1960 in Chile is towering above them, as well as the afterquake (which is a T) in Alaska of 1964.

Does This Pattern Continues to Go Back?

Before 1900 there are no official records of magnitudes. Based upon the recorded damage reports, were seismologists able to estimate the magnitude on Richter’s scale. Each locality for which information is available is assigned a score on the so called Mercalli Scale.

We’ve carefully checked all registered earthquakes before 1900 and putted them in a graph. Then we’ve made the most probable fit onto this pattern. Of all possibilities the number 42 resurfaced again, but now from a totally different angle.

An interesting result.

Top 10 Earthquakes before 1900

Location Year Magnitude
Sumatra 1833 9
Chile 1868 9
Peru 1746 8.8
Portugal 1755 8.8
Chile 1877 8.8
Japan 1498 8.6
Japan 1707 8.6
Sumatra 1861 8.5
Japan 1854 8.5
Chile 1751 8.5

The Most Likely Pattern From 1498 Till Now

Fig. 8: This graph contains the major earthquakes from 1498 (Japan) up to 2004 (Sumatra). The Earthquake of Japan in 2011 is also present in the graph and is regarded as the T event after the big R event of Sumatra. Measured is the distance in time between the major events R. What we see is a varying frequency between the major earthquakes and a varying time distance between the alleged P, R, and T events. The towering earthquakes of Chile in 1960 and Alaska in 1964 could be related with the peak amount of atomic tests between 1958 and 1962.

More About the Largest Earthquakes Before 1900

The magnitudes of the whole list of earthquakes before 1900 is unverified and based on observations of damage reports. The amount of very heavy earthquakes are higher after 1900 than before 1900. We could draw the fast conclusion that earthquakes are increasing but that is probably not true.

A more reliable conclusion is that damage reports underestimate the real magnitude. Some on this list could been heavier than we think. The magnitudes are not accurate enough to withdraw a reliable PQRST cardiograph pattern from it. But it seems to be reliable enough to listen to the heartbeat rhythm, the big R beat, of the Earth.

Underground Atomic Tests

Fig. 9: Because Earth seems to be alive as everything else on it, are underground atomic tests not the wisest things to do. The Earth will react to that like any other living being would do: agitated. Only because it reacts so very slowly we don’t recognize it as cause and effect.

The Prediction of the Next Trinity

We can predict with a high degree of certainty that, based on the above shown patterns, between 2040 and 2055 a series of 3 very heavy earthquakes will strike. The first will be the least heavy (P), than followed by the heaviest (R), and than followed by the last median heavy earthquake (T).

Maybe is the Q a deep earthquake which always precedes the large earthquake R. An interesting thought. It could be a warning.

The location will probably be the antipode of the last big quake in Sumatra, and most likely strike in Chile. It will be a heavy one. Investments in buildings and infrastructure are done for depreciation periods of many decennials. Better be prepared than surprised.

Earthquakes in between this period are just “rumbles” of Earth’s heart. Depending on how we treat the Earth in the mean time will the Earth react on this, like we’ve seen during the period of underground atomic tests. Fracking operations and deep mining operations make the Earth feel agitated. It will react. Earth is alive.

Now you know.

© 2018 by Mario Buildreps

 

The Secrets of Stonehenge – An Ancient Message

Stonehenge Is Not What It Seems

If you still believe in the medieval paradigm of Stone Age, Bronze Age, and Iron Age it’s about time you start to educate yourself. Not by mindless repetitions of historical text books, but by boosting your brain with mathematics.

If you believe you’re bad in mathematics it’s because it wasn’t explained well enough to you; everyone is basically good in mathematics. That is because we are in our true essence mathematical entities.

But if you burden your consciousness with tons of useless stuff like words and ideas which are untrue, you’ve programmed yourself into an irrational being incapable of grasping mathematics. In that state you can’t reach your own essence anymore.

Waking up can be done by shifting and/or widening your paradigm, and by dumping false ideas out of your mindset.

Enjoy the video!

 

© 2017 by Mario Buildreps

 

Lost Civilizations – The Temple Complex of Bagan

The temple complex of Bagan once housed over 10,000 temples. Today only 2,200 are left. Were they built by a series of emperors or is that again one of the many tragic errors historians have made?

Fig. 1: The temple complex of Bagan is so vast and houses so many temples it’s almost beyond imagination.

Built by the Pagan Emperors?

Ask anyone (if they’ve heard of them in the first place) about the temples of Bagan and most people will tell you that they were built by some ruler or emperor in the middle ages. After all, that’s what we were taught in school and far too many of us have accepted these explanations and have not concerned ourselves to think about the subject again.

According to the Burmese chronicles, which has been drafted by the monarchy of Myanmar (note: this monarchy is followed up by the British colonials), it is said that over a period of 250 years the Pagan rulers built over 10,000 temples. The chronicles, of course, do not mention the reasons why anyone would spent a mad amount of effort and money to built an average amount of 40 temples each year, and that over a course of 250 years. Imagine that!

Like Napoleon said: “History is written by the winners”. Who are the winners in this case? The winners were the latest ruling monarchs followed up by the colonials. They took the already present temples as their own, renovated them partially, but their orientation never changed. Rulers have nothing to gain by telling people the truth about the ancient past.

Where is Myanmar?

Fig. 2: Bagan in Myanmar is located on the Eastern Hemisphere between India and China.

Where is the Temple Complex of Bagan Located?

Table 1: Orientation of temples of Bagan. The correlations with the former poles jump through the roof.

The temple complex of Bagan in Myanmar is located between India and China. Both China and India are home of many very ancient structures.

China has hundreds of pyramids which are telling the same story as the temples of Bagan. Most of the pyramids in China are counterclockwise oriented as well. These temples of Bagan are much more ancient than historians believe. How do we know that? By studying their orientation patterns.

There is no historian who is able to explain the orientation patterns of these temples. Although mainstream historians tend to ignore many of these factual findings and conclusions, and if pressed would answer with the words, “coincidence” or “fortuitous”. That, in fact, has nothing to do with real science.

Most temples of Bagan are either oriented to our current geographic pole or are counterclockwise oriented. Anyone who is somewhat acquainted with the theory will understand that these temples, if they would have been oriented to former geographic poles, will be counterclockwise oriented by definition.

How The Temples of Bagan Are Oriented

Fig. 3: The orientation patterns of the temples of Bagan show similarities with the pyramids in Xi’an, China. A medium sized group is clockwise oriented (right), another medium sized group is cardinally oriented (middle), and a very large group is counterclockwise oriented (left). The intersection clusters of the counterclockwise oriented group all converge at an explosive large rate on Greenland.

Why Are the Temples Mainly Counterclockwise Oriented?

Most of the temples (63%) on the temple complex of Bagan are counterclockwise oriented. Archaeologists haven’t even noticed this fact, let alone asked themselves the question why that would have been done.

There is a group of temples (17.7%) which are slightly clockwise (+5.4°) oriented, and some of them make even an extraordinary large jump in the clockwise direction. Because this collection is so small we can neglect them as a small unimportant anomaly.

Of course we could try to solve this issue as to why these anomalies occurred and suggest all kinds of assumptions. But why would we do that? Small amounts of anomalies will always occur in all research fields. We focus on the majorities, which are the two groups from which one is oriented to our current geo pole and the very large group which is counterclockwise oriented. These two groups together make up 82.3% of the temple complex.

If we regard this counterclockwise orientation pattern of the temples as the result of coincidence, there’s 1 to 948 billion (0.000000000105%) chance for that pattern to be actually the result of coincidence. That is why we can be 100% certain it is the result of an organized process of orienting the temples to former geographic poles.

And why are we 100% certain of that? Because the largest group of temples (49) is actually oriented to our current geographic pole. That shows the tradition in this region to actually orient temples to the cardinal directions. That is also no coincidence, because there’s only a whopping 1 to 3.40×1030 (3,400,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000) for that orientation pattern (to the current geo pole) to be the result of coincidence.

The Incredible Reality: Earth Knew Multiple Former Civilizations

Fig. 4: The crust has been deformed heavily over the last 440,000 years, and knew 4 former geographic poles where many ancient structure were oriented to. They cluster massively in a few mathematical nodes, proving an unbelievable reality: the Earth knew multiple former civilizations – lost civilizations. Atlantis is still in plain sight for everyone to see, only no one seems to know it.

On top of that are the orientation patterns clustering around the same clusters (Pole II to Pole IV) that we’ve already found and proven before. How more proof does one require?

It is a fact that the orientation pattern of the temples of Bagan comply with the theory or method. There is not even a single doubt why these temples are oriented in this odd way: they were built when the geographic pole was at another location. The temples of Bagan are therefore many times more ancient than historians believe.

It is always crucial to remind yourself to the fact that we are always speaking of the orientation of the original foundations, because we’ve seen many times renovations on top of older foundations. If you focus on the top structures you’ll never find definitive answers of their real age. Orientation, when studied in large numbers, reveals the only true story.

The history of the temple complex of Bagan stretches over a period of more than 250,000 years. Any other story is a hotchpotch of nonsense, twists, and lies.

Graph 1: The orientation of the temples is mainly counterclockwise, and therefore complies with the theory as most of the other ancient structures on the eastern hemisphere. The blue dashed line shows the major trend. It points heavily to Pole II, Pole III and Pole IV. The majority of the most ancient structure were most probably destroyed.

Ancient Temples Were Only Renovated by the Emperors

Most of the temples were already present when new rulers took over the area. As most megalomaniac conquerors do they took the temples as their own renovated them, painted them, some even got a golden roof. These ignorant emperors had no idea, for temples to have true (secret) power, they had to be oriented to the contemporary cardinals.

The new emperor ordered to rewrite existing records and burned all the ancient records. Tribes that were in possession of ancient knowledge were persecuted as an attempt to wipe out the true knowledge of the past.

Tragically, historians do not listen to the local folk tales but believe that writings left by rulers are the only reliable source. Funny enough is this the only source which is not reliable.

Happily, there’s always mathematics to set the lies straight, and to separate all the official historical nonsense from the truth.

How This Orientation Pattern Follows the Shifting Crust

Fig. 5: The orientation pattern of the temples of Bagan follows clearly the shifting poles, and therefore the shifting crust. These temples are as old as these poles are. The age of the temples of Bagan stretches over a period of 300,000 years. There’s only 1 to many trillions chance that historians are telling the right story. 

Forbidden History – The True Age of the Temples of Bagan

 

© 2017 by Mario Buildreps

 

 

 

 

Why Chichen Itza is 300,000 Years Old

Ancient Buildings Are Way Older

The ancient Maya site, Chichen Itza, contains 46 buildings of difference sizes, from which the pyramid of Kukulkan although the most famous one, it’s just one of them. The orientation of the ancient buildings on Chichen Itza seems for the eyes of a layman randomly.

Until now has no one ever been able to explain the seemingly chaotic orientation of the building on Chichen Itza. It appears the site follows the pattern of the shifting crust. 76.1% of the buildings (35) on Chichen Itza are oriented to either poles I to IV, while these poles only cover an area of only 38.4%. It means that the chances are close to zero that this is coincidence.

The pure mathematical method chops off all the nonsense that historians always told us about our ancient history. The history of our past stretches over a period of hundreds of thousands of years. Half a dozen advanced civilizations were wiped off the face of the planet, while not only archaeologists are completely oblivious about this, geologists say the crust was very steady over the last half million years. Both disciplines appear to be wrong.

We can state with a mathematical certainty of over 99.99% that Chichen Itza age stretches over a period of more than 300,000 years.

Enjoy the video below!

This is one of the best maps of Chichen Itza. The orientation of all buildings is very accurately documented, which is used in the data.

The Video:  Why Chichen Itza is 300,000 Years Old

© 2017 by Mario Buildreps

 

Lost Civilizations – Göbekli Tepe, An Ancient Astronomical Device?

How Old is Göbekli Tepe Really?

By using the Holistic Orientation Based Method we prove with more than 99% certainty that Göbekli Tepe is actually much older than mainstream historians want us to believe. As most other ancient structures Göbekli Tepe also follows the pattern of the shifting crust. The large T-shaped pillars are oriented to three former geographic poles, as shown in this short video below.

The video does not answer the question what is was this site was used for. We’re still working on its exact purpose which will be published in the future book. Göbekli Tepe was most probably an astronomical device to measure the changing seasons, similar as the Nuraghes in Sardinia or El Caracol (on Chichen Itza) in Mexico.

Göbekli Tepe’s age stretches over a period of more than 200,000 years. The mainstream estimated age of 12,000 has nothing to do with the truth, it’s in fact an uneducated wild guess in the dark.

Only mathematics can set you free and save you from ignorance!

 

 

© 2017 by Mario Buildreps

 

Lost Civilizations – Is Caral the Cradle of Humanity?

Why Caral is One of the Oldest Ruins

Caral is much more ancient than anyone held possible. The mainstream views estimate the site to be at least 5,000 years old. That’s even older than the official estimates of the pyramids of Giza.

The area of Caral contains a large amount of pyramid like structures which we’ve processed into an orientation pattern. Officially is the age of Caral even of the charts of the Holistic Orientation Based Dating Method which goes back to about 500,000 years. Caral is even older than that. Much older.

Note that we’re not talking about the top structures of the pyramids of Caral. We’re solely speaking of the foundations of the original buildings. It appears that many of the structures were built over one another during the eons, but because the original orientation of the buildings remained in most cases the same, we were able to reconstruct the age of the oldest structures on Caral. And they are way older, more than one hundred times, than archaeologists estimate them to be.

We can say with a probability of more than 99.999% that the oldest ruins on Caral are older than 350,000 years! The calculations are done purely mathematical without a single dig into the ground or even without one step on one of the pyramids. That appears not to be necessary to understand their true antiquity.

Enjoy watching!

© 2017 by Mario Buildreps

 

 

The Secrets of Carnac – How Old Is It Really?

The Mysterious Standing Stones of Carnac

The sacred ancient site of Carnac in France contains today over 3,000 standing stones. While they are orderly aligned in mind boggling long rows has no one ever before discovered their purpose. With the Holistic Orientation Based Dating Method is the most probable purpose of the site rediscovered.

By processing the different sorts of alignments, comparing the amount of correlations with the Poles I to V, appears the site to correlate with the Poles I to IV with a staggering high probability of over 99.999%.

It is therefore most probably true that the age of the site stretches over a period of more than 250,000 years. That raises even more questions, like why the stones are still in plain site and not covered with a layer of soil. That are one of the questions that science has to solve open mindedly in the future. Is it because the site has been in use up to a few thousand years ago? Has it been kept clean by the ancients as a sacred place? Who were the people that brought the stones there in the first place? How did they move so many stones?

One thing is sure with a high probability: the culture peaked between 130,000 and 155,000 years ago. It is during this period they positioned most of the standing stones.

Enjoy watching!

© 2017 by Mario Buildreps

 

Teotihuacan – City of the Gods?

Teotihuacan: A Massive City Shrouded in Mystery

Teotihuacan belongs to the largest ancient cities in the world. It draws each year almost 2 million visitors. Most visitors are unaware what it is they are walking on, because they are not informed properly by the exploiters nor by the archaeologists. It is probably not even intentional, since they’re unaware of a much larger truth about our ancient past, and therefore unable to inform the public well. It’s mere ignorance, hidden behind a veil of alleged expertism.

No one knows who built the city. But just recently, thanks to this new, very controversial research, it became clear that the city is between 210,000 and 225,000 years old. Teotihuacan was oriented to Pole III. The probability that this claim is true and correct is 99.99987%. It won’t be easily outmatched by any other claim in the future. Debunkers are already sharpening their claws and jaws.

This is the most probable truth. Enjoy watching the video!

 

© 2017 by Mario Buildreps

 

Lost Civilizations: Nuraghe Piscu and the Ancient Solstices

Today we find over 7,000 ancient stone structures on Sardinia, a mid-sized island of the size of Sicily. Nuraghe Piscu is one of them, and is in well enough condition to withdraw interesting information of our true past and lost civilizations.

Piscu’s history stretches over a period of between 240,000 and 300,000 years ago. Mainstream science still believes that ancient structures are just a few thousand years old, while they are a factor of 100 besides the truth. There is a whopping gap between ignorance and enlightenment.

Enjoy the video!

© 2017 by Mario Buildreps

 

 

Scientific Paper: Orientation of Latin-American Pyramids and Temples

ABSTRACT

The amount of non-cardinal orientated temples and pyramids in Latin-America, from Mexico down to Peru, is often attributed as the result of a possible orientation to the magnetic pole. It is argued in several researches (Fuson 1969, Carlson 1975, Klokočník, 2010) that structures could have been oriented by means of a lodestone compass or a similar instrument.

However, by gathering and analyzing 157 separate sites in Latin-America, from Mexico down to Peru, it appears there is, in contrast to former researches, no distinct relation to be found between orientation and the location of the wandering magnetic pole (McElhinny and McFadden, 2000).

Over 90% of the ancient sites in Latin-America are oriented East of True North (clockwise oriented), which cannot be caused by coincidence or topography. That made researchers believe magnetic compasses could have been used to orient the structures. Because the magnetic pole wanders around the geographic pole, when using a compass this could be the cause of such a deviant orientation.

A square or rectangle building can be uniquely oriented within a range of 90°. We cannot know other than as an assumption which side of a pyramid or temple is the main side. It is assumptive to argue that an alleged main side of a temple was for example oriented to the East of the rising Sun. These kind of assumptions pollutes many of the researches done in this field making most conclusion useless. Therefore is this research solely focused on the orientation of the Latin-American pyramids and temples as a square or rectangle in regard to the cardinals, without making assumptions towards the conclusions.

There is no correlation found between orientation of the Latin-American pyramids and temples and the wandering magnetic pole. This research concludes that the Latin-American pyramids and temples were oriented to an astronomical or geological phenomenon other than the wandering magnetic pole.

You can download the full paper here: Orientation of Latin-American Pyramids and Temples

 

© 2017 by Mario Buildreps

 

Why Pyramids Correlate With Ice Ages – Part 2: How the Ice Sheets Were Formed

A Difficult Subject

This new video in the series explains how the ice sheets on Canada, America, Greenland Scandinavia, Europe and Russia waxed and waned.

The video might be more difficult than the former video, but it had to be published to show the completeness of the theory. The theory of the geographic pole (the whole crust) to shift in the latitudinal direction explains how the ice sheets could have been formed and why they melted again. On top of that are the degrees of shift of the poles corresponding to the degrees of temperature variation of the last series of glaciation graphs and so with the orientation clusters of large groups of pyramids.

The Milankovitch cycles provide no basis to freeze the North pole as during the last series of glaciation cycles, like geologists still believe today. The varying Solar insolation due to obliquity, precession and eccentricity is unable to freeze the pole completely, not even in a billion years.

Part 2: How the Ice Sheets Were Formed

© 2017 by Mario Buildreps

 

Why Pyramids Correlate With Ice Ages – Part 1: Centricity of Ice Around Poles

A New Series

This new series of videos will lead you into a new, fully scientific paradigm of the Earth and our ancient history. It is taught to us at school that history of the Earth is another one than history of Humanity, but it appears they are very intimately entangled.

Part 1 of the series shows that the center point of the last series of ice ages cannot be explained otherwise than a different position of Earth’s crust. Through advanced mathematics is the history of our planet and that of ancient humanity unlocked. An amazing truth imposes itself to you.

Why Greenland Was the Center Point of the Great Ice Sheets

The center point of the great ice sheets was on Greenland. Exactly that same location is pointed out by a large group of ancient structures. The probability of this location to be coincidental is a whopping 1 to 209 trillion. An amazing truth. Greenland melts because its ice sheet was ones formed at another location: an ancient North pole more than 130,000 years ago. Its current location does not belong to its current ice sheet, so it will melt.

Because the crust has crawled very slowly during a high eccentric orbit around the Sun, large masses of ice once formed on the North pole, were transported to another location. Greenland’s ice sheet is the last remnant of this phenomenon.

That explains in the most simple way why CO2 lags behind on temperatures, hence it is the effect of crustal displacements. Can it be more simple than that? That complies perfectly to Occam’s Razor.

Mathematical Proof

The series will take you step by step on an amazing tour. Powerful mathematics is used to prove the way how mainstream science interprets history is false science. It is also powerful mathematical proof that the way how mainstream science interprets Global Warming is false science. Virtually everything that mainstream science interprets and presents about the Earth and ancient history appears to be false science.

The way how pyramids and ancient temples are oriented on the Western and Eastern hemisphere shows us unmistakably that they follow the path of crawling crust, and are so staggeringly more ancient than we ever believed. Three of the five mathematical nodes are located on Greenland, showing how Greenland ‘moved’ over the North pole, thus the ice sheet was formed in three stages over a period of about 160,000 years.

The series will explain how and why the crust shifted causing what the myths called the deluge. They were real. It will also show in a simple way how very difficult topics like paleomagnetism contains two variables: magnetic shifts and crustal shifts.

© 2017 by Mario Buildreps

 

How Old is Göbekli Tepe Really?

Our History Has Been Corrupted

Fig 1: Göbekli Tepe is not a sanctuary, it’s an ancient calender. Its age spans over a period of 250,000 years, and was (re)built in several stages. More about how it worked and how it was used will be published in the future.

Many people who land on this website are interested in Göbekli Tepe or any other ancient site. You were probably already questioning the mainstream ideas about history. And that has a reason: there are too many ancient mysteries left unexplained.

Somewhere in your unconscious you already knew the official versions were incorrect. But what is the correct version then?

If you’ve carefully read the articles on this website, you’ll know the true history of Humanity, and how it expands over hundreds of thousands of years all over the globe. The official version of history has been compressed with a factor of 50 to what it is today. It is said of Göbekli Tepe it is one of the oldest man made temple complexes on Earth.

But the facts are pointing out that Göbekli Tepe is “just” one of the many ancient sites around the globe which are way older than you’ve ever held to be possible.

Logos or Mythos?

If you like to label Göbekli Tepe with fancy words like “early Neolithic sanctuary” in order to address the alleged age of Göbekli Tepe, you’ve probably not much affection with mathematics and numbers. These kinds of labels are meaningless, suggesting that the user is an expert in his field.

Most of these experts are unable to dig any deeper than poor attempts to label their world where they live in, without really understanding what it is they’re surrounded with. Because this website only deals with numbers and mathematics it is able to explain our history much more accurately, and I can tell you it deviates awesomely from what you’ve learned. Throw away everything you’ve learned about history!

What will it be for you? Truth or falsehood? Logos versus Mythos?

Fig 2: Göbekli Tepe was covered with many feet of soil. Stratigraphy records of this region show the soil builds up only 4 to 5 feet every 100,000 years. How old would Göbekli Tepe be then? What does this tell us about the used dating techniques and the established ideas? That they’re in fact misleading us. Only the Logos will set you free.

How Old is Göbekli Tepe Really?

Göbekli Tepe’s age spans over a period of 250,000 years. Some of the readers will now say: “oh, that’s impossible!” Is it? There are major indicators, mathematical truths, which leads to this inevitable conclusion. These indicators dwarf any other so called “evidence” which is gathered at the local scene.

Archaeology will of course not agree with this conclusion, but that’s because archaeology is, because of its frozen paradigm, an irrational discipline, unable to deal with the facts as they really are. Archaeology, as it is practiced by the established academia, has nothing to do with real science. It is nothing more than a believe system to keep the existing paradigm intact.

How is it possible I came to this conclusion? Please, follow me on this tour.

There’s No Significant Difference in Level Between Roman Buildings and New Buildings

Fig 3: This Roman temple in Kroatia (on the left) from which it is said it’s about 2,000 years old lies at the same ground level as the surrounding contemporary buildings (right and behind). Why isn’t this building lying much deeper? Because chronostratigraphy says about this region that the natural rate in which ground layers build up is very slowly, only 0.1 feet (1.2″) per 2,000 years. That’s why it is at equal level!
Fig 4: Another example of an ancient Roman temple in France. There’s also no difference in levels between the temple and the contemporary surrounding buildings.

Roman Buildings Are at the Same Ground Level

When we look to the many buildings in ancient Rome or to the many ancient Roman settlements around Europe, we see that the levels of ancient Roman buildings and contemporary buildings do not differ significantly or none at all. That raises the question: why is it then that Göbekli Tepe was covered under many feet of soil?

Archaeologists argue that Göbekli Tepe had a ‘roof which collapsed’ in order to explain the thick amount of soil in which the site was covered. That argument doesn’t explain why it’s lying deeper as the surrounding area. The only rational explanation is a very old age.

What many people easily swallow is the argument that Göbekli Tepe is much older than the Roman temples. According to the archaeologists is Göbekli Tepe about 6 times older as the Roman temples. Many people have nothing with large numbers, like one thousand years, or 12,000 years, let alone something like 250,000 years. It all exceeds the time frame of the mortal ego many folds.

But if we follow the chronostratigraphy of that region, Göbekli Tepe would, if it is really 12,000 years old, be covered with just about 7 to 8 inches of soil. The site would still be in plain sight, possibly covered with some vegetation.

Fig 5: Why is this ancient arena in Arles at the same level as the rest of the city? Why didn’t its immense weight push the colossal structure many feet beneath the contemporary ground level? Because it is “only” 2,000 years old, and the difference in level is only 1 to 2 inches.

How Deep Did They Have to Dig for Göbekli Tepe?

That’s probably the first question no one ever asked before. As a general rule counts: the deeper something lies, the older it is. The depth on which a site can be found depends on the rate of which the ground layers are built up over time.

If the depth on which a site has to dug up is about 15 feet below the current ground level, and none of the Roman temples had ever to be dug up, how old could it really be?

If this first simple question still don’t raise your eyebrows, you might need a serious paradigm shift.

Chronostratigraphy gives some of the first indications of its true age.

What is Chronostratigraphy?

Chronostratigraphy is the study of the age of ground layers. It attempts to label an age to a certain ground layer. The rate in which ground layers build up varies somewhat, depending of the region.

The common rate in which ground layers build up in a typical region like Southeast Turkey, where Göbekli Tepe is situated, is around 4 to 5 feet of dense soil per 100,000 years. Because Göbekli Tepe was covered with a layer of soil of between 10 to 15 feet it gives an indication of its true age, which is average around 220,000 years.

Are there other indicators that point to a similar age? Yes, there are. The orientations reveal a more differentiated and accurate age pattern.

 

Fig 6: This chronostratigraphy graph shows the rate in which soil layers build up in Southeast Europe (Italy) over a long period of time. It takes about 100,000 years to build up 4 to 5 feet (1.2 to 1.5 m) of dense compressed soil.

First Rough Indications of Göbekli Tepe’s True Age

The original ground level of Göbekli Tepe varies between 10 to 15 feet beneath the current ground level. All this sand, rocks, and soil that the archaeologists had to dig away came there in a natural way. That takes an enormous amount of time, between 200,000 to 375,000 years, depending to which part of the construction you’re looking at.

It is said by archaeologists that Göbekli Tepe is some 12,000 years old, but there’s in fact not a single fact that will support this claim, other than associative and assumptive evidence gathered at the local scene.

Göbekli Tepe was also never covered with a kind of roof. That’s an unavoidable belief because the site is hundreds of thousands of years old. The alleged roof which is believed to have collapsed is made up by archaeologists because that much soil cannot build up in just 12,000 years. The surrounding area is also at a similar higher level, hence debunking the belief that Göbekli Tepe had a roof. Otherwise the rest of Turkey had a roof as well! And it all collapsed!

Göbekli Tepe was a calender which served to measure the time of the year. It was an open air construction to measure the seasons, and every construction was once oriented to another geographic pole. The proof is in the numbers.

Fig 7: There are still people who believe that the Mayan culture was not more than 2,500 years old. But the stratigraphy records show that the guy standing at the bottom of the Mayan ruin looks at records of 650,000 years old. A conditioned mind is unable to grasp a single bit of it.

A False Narrative

Each separate construction of Göbekli Tepe belongs to a different time frame, which I will show you further on. These time frames are many tens of thousands of years apart.

Archaeologists want you to believe it was all built in the same period. It’s all wrong, and part of the big bamboozle. The people who run these sciences want you to believe there’s no sophisticated high rise culture beyond some 12,000 years ago.

Once you understand how the science community really works, you’ll understand how important these dogmas are. It imprisons you into the false narrative of natural evolution from primitive to sophisticated, while in fact we are descendants from high developed cultures that spanned the entire planet.

But these ancient species became subjected to genetic manipulations, to enslave them in a corrupt system where the few rule over the masses. That is where we are now today and we are starting to awaken very slowly. Science will try to prevent this at any cost, hence the big bamboozle around ancient history.

We were once a free species, free from genetic modifications, free to roam the Earth.

Göbekli Tepe’s Original Ground Level

Fig 8: Göbekli Tepe looked originally like on this artist impression. It had to be uncovered of many feet of naturally deposited soil. That is the first sign of an age of several hundreds of thousands of years.

Orientation of the Large T-shaped Pillars

Fig 9: This map shows how the major T-shaped stones are oriented. Because these orientations matches 3 out of 4 with the already proven former geo poles, we can calculate the probability of these orientations to be coincidental.

The map on the right shows how the four constructions are oriented. All four constructions are differently oriented and all constructions are negatively oriented in regard of our current geographic North pole.

Archaeologists never paid attention to the negative orientation of the site. The question why the site is not oriented to our current North pole has never been answered. To where would the site be oriented? And why would it be oriented so oddly and so differently from each other?

Why are the large T-shaped pillars not oriented towards the solstices? No one knows the answer, except some wild guesses that have not a single rational basis.

The answer is that the site of Göbekli Tepe is reoriented after every crustal displacement. Every crustal displacement resulted into another geographic pole position. This process spans over a period of more than 250,000 years

Because the crust (and so the geographic poles) has moved is Göbekli Tepe reoriented in regard to the geographic pole. How large are the odds for this claim to be actually true?

We have seen that the stratigraphy records are pointing to an oldest age (A) of between 350,000 and 375,000 years. Can we reinforce this age with other evidence or even proof? Yes, we can.

Note that the older a structure becomes (which you can derive from its orientation, the more counterclockwise oriented, the older it is) the less is left from the structure. It’s again a pattern which matches on top of the other matching patterns. Do you still doubt? That’s good, be critical until you’ve seen the full proof.

How the Large T-shaped Pillars Correlate to Ancient Geo Pole

Fig 10: Göbekli Tepe correlates with 3 former geo pole locations. The odds for this matching pattern to be coincidental is very small. Because the odds are so small we have very clear evidence for its true age and the reason why the site has been reoriented after major crustal displacements.
Göbekli Tepe Relates to: Probability for this correlation to be coincidental*: Age of the Pole (Kyrs)**:
Pole I 0 – 26
Pole II (C) 1.50% 130 – 155
Pole III (B) 1.61% 210 – 225
Pole IV 240 – 270
Pole V (A) 2.67% 335 – 345
Combined Probability 0.000645% or 1 to 155,100

*Probability calculations are explained in the book which will be published in the near future. 

**Latest data November 2017, they may differ from earlier publications. The periods in between the stable pole positions are crustal displacements. Cultures flourished mainly during a stable crust which lasted between 10,000 years up to periods of 30,000 years. Note that periods of unrest are longer than periods of stability.

The Conclusions

The conclusions of this research are clear:

  • the stratigraphic records point to an age of between 350,000 to 375,000 years for the oldest, deepest constructions. This age correlates with the (re)orientation patterns of the site. This relation alone is very small to be just coincidental, which is not taken into consideration in the probability calculations.
  • the orientation patterns reveal more subtle ages of between 350,000 and 100,000 years.
  • the certainty of the claim for Göbekli Tepe to be older than 100,000 years is 99.997%.
  • it is for 99.997% certain that Göbekli Tepe has been reoriented due to crustal displacements.
  • the part of Göbekli Tepe marked as “D” (fig. 8) and is oriented between Pole II and Pole I has been built during the shifting crust, and became obsolete after a few millenniums.
  • we can pinpoint the age of “D” at between 70,000 and 80,000 years.
  • none of the calenders are oriented to our current geographic North pole, because the site was not restored as a calender anymore around 70,000 years ago after “D” became obsolete.
  • The older a structure, the less is left from it. A is the oldest, D is the youngest.

There’s nothing in and around the site that’s pointing to an age of just 12,000 years. This age is nothing more than a wild guess in the dark, and based on unscientific methods.

If you have to dig for ruins many feet below the current ground level, your alarm bells should go off. Check out the chronostratigraphy records of your region first to get an indication how the soil builds up over time.

If you have the opportunity to use a ground radar, work from rough to fine. You can scan the contours of the structure and find out how it is oriented in regard to our current geographic pole. If it relates to one of the ancient poles (which you can find on this website) and you find a similar match in the stratigraphy records, you’ve already a 1 to 10,000 hit they match up coincidentally. You’ve found its most probable age without stabbing a single spade in the ground.

 

© 2017 by Mario Buildreps

Anunnaki – Where Did ENKI Go To?

According to the Sumerian Tablets came the Anunnaki to Earth some 440,000 years ago to look for gold. After their installment in Sumer, which is nowadays the region of Iraq and Iran, they built a vast empire around the world. The Tablets speak of Enki to travel South, which has been interpreted as him traveling to South-Africa. Logically when there is not a single clue about Earth’s true geological history, and how it looked like between 400,000 and 500,000 years ago.

South seen from Sumer (Iraq) was back then a whole different direction then it is today, and so are all interpretations, even the most controversial ones, looking into the wrong direction.

Learn where Enki really went and understand why this whole region is what it is today. Only then you will understand where the knowledge came from. If you want to descent into the rabbit hole, make sure you go into the right direction.

 

© 2017 by Mario Buildreps

 

Pyramids of China – Why Our History Has Been Falsified

Who built the pyramids of China? Historians and Archaeologists tell us it were the emperors who lived somewhere between 500 BC and 1000 AD. That story appears to be a lie.

The mathematical keys which are found on a global scale show with certainties up to 99.999% that the orientation patterns of the Chinese pyramids are in accordance with the theory or method – meaning their ages range between 350,000 years down to a dozen millenniums old.

None of these pyramids were built by some emperor. The historical tales were bent by the ones who ruled, just as Mao Zedong did during the revolution.

The Chinese pyramids are aligned to the same geographical poles as pyramids and temples in Egypt, Belize, Mexico, Israel, Iran, Iraq, Pakistan, Guatemala. The odds for these patterns to be coincidental are so small we can be sure we have found the ultimate mathematical proof that ancient civilizations were scattered and decimated by earth crust displacements.

The Chinese culture belongs to what some have labeled as a lost civilization with a very long history of more than 300,000 years of peaks and valleys. The Chinese medical knowledge of acupuncture has probably its roots in this lost civilization of hundreds of millenniums ago which was given to us by “the gods from the sky” – the Anunnaki.

They became what we now call lost civilizations, but their structures are still in plain sight. That historians and archaeologists tell us something else can now be labeled as mythological nonsense. The mathematical facts tell us something else.

This short video is made to show a tiny part of the theory. You can read the big article on the main page to get a full grip on the theory or method. Enjoy watching!

 

© 2017 by Mario Buildreps

 

Earth Crust Displacements is What Caused Ice Ages

Hapgood was right, Earth Crust Displacements is what caused Ice Ages. Hapgood was wrong about the causative force, but was definitely right about the phenomenon itself. Hapgood was also wrong in the direction of the displacements, they went solely in the latitudinal direction, and not longitudinal like Hapgood believed. That’s because Earth behaves like a spinning top that reacts perpendicular to the oscillating pull of the Sun when the Earth is in high eccentric orbit. The eccentricity of orbit fits perfectly on the glaciation graphs, something where many scientists have wondered about but still don’t understand why that is.

https://patreon.com/buildreps

© 2017 Mario Buildreps

Secret of Pyramids Around the World SOLVED!

This short video shows how ancient history has to be explained. The orientation patterns of pyramids, temples and sites around the world reveal seamlessly how they are related to the ice ages.

The true age of stone structures spread around the world is not just a few thousand years, no, these structures cover a period of between several millenniums up to almost 500,000 years. Our history has been compressed with a factor of about 50 times, and on top of that are facts twisted and changed.

The Roman empire, followed by the Catholic empire destroyed very effectively the remains and historical evidence of lost civilizations. The reason why this has been done? To get control over a fast growing population.

If you don’t know where you came from, you don’t know where you’re going to. If you live in the perception that your ancestry, and so ultimately you, came from primitive barbarians you’re more willing to accept the kind of system we’re currently living in. Our ancestors were much higher developed both spiritually and intellectually than your conditioning makes you believe.

You must develop a perception on your origin to cast off your chains, and the only way to do that is to use advanced mathematics to explain our real origin and our real history.

Own Hosted Version:

Youtube Version:

© Mario Buildreps 2017

Lost Civilizations: Stonehenge – True Age Revealed (Part V)

Stonehenge is about 50 times older than claimed by historians and archaeologists. The age is way of the charts. The research is not done by mindless digging, but by using mathematics, and mathematics alone. History is not what it seems – it is much more awesome and odder than historians want you to believe.

 

© Mario Buildreps 2017

Lost Civilizations: El Caracol, the Ancient Observatory (Part IV)

El Caracol, the ancient observatory of Chichen Itza, was used to observe the solstices and the equinoxes. Because the crust is displaced, the observatory is out of line and that’s it why it doesn’t work anymore. Because science hasn’t worked out yet what happened in the ancient past, the observatory is interpreted in a completely wrong way. This video explains how the observatory was used. The building is 284,000 years old, and was built in several stages to adapt it to the changed geo pole position.

The film will explain you bit by bit how this observatory was operated over a period of tens of thousands of years. The proof is in the numbers, and needs little further explanation. Our ancient history looks entirely different than the version which is taught to us.

Enjoy!

Own Hosted Version:

Youtube version:

 

© 2017 by Buildreps

New Pyramid Found in Egypt?

The Nabta Playa Calendar Circle was oriented to the Equinox between 210,000 and 225,000 years ago. It is that old! It was used to measure both the Winter and Summer solstices. It is now unusable because the crust has shifted a few times.

Prediction of a New Unearthed Massive Structure in Egypt

Finding ancient, yet unearthed structures is like finding undiscovered planets; we can do this by using mathematics. The new theory predicts an unearthed structure in Egypt close to Nabta playa.

The probability there won’t be a yet unearthed structure is: 0.021% or 1 to 4,765. There is still a chance, although small, it’s a mare’s nest. The unearthed structure shares the same geographic pole as Teotihuacan. It was probably a pyramid, but that has to be verified at the location itself.

The Contours of This Structure

The contours of a square structure are visible. The orientation is measurable and correlates with Teotihuacan.

Same Base as Khufu and Teotihuacan

The size of the base of this unknown structure is equal to the base of the Great Pyramid of Khufu and that of Teotihuacan. It is probably destroyed long time ago or maybe it was never finished, but the contours of the foundations seem to be clearly present.

Because the size of the base is similar to that of the other two big pyramids makes it even more likely it is/was a pyramid.

The highlights:

  • the structure has the same orientation (±1°) as the Nabta Playa Calendar Circle,
  • the structure is oriented to the same former geo pole as Teotihuacan,
  • the structure has the same base size as Teotihuacan and Khufu,
  • the contours of the structure are too square to be coincidental.

When we add up all these facts the odds are very good we have found something new.

Examples of Other Very Ancient Structural Contours

Six examples of ancient contours of ancient structures. Most of them are destroyed, yet in many cases remain the contours of the foundations visible.

A New Player in the Game

This unearthed pyramid is approximately of the same age as the Nabta Playa Calendar Circle: between 210,000 and 225,000 years. I know, that is way off the map of historians.

It’s not a theory stitched together by mythos stories like historians and Egyptologists like to do, it’s a mathematical theory that covers most of the known ancient structures all around the globe. A brand new powerful player in the game.

If you know nothing about the theory that predicts this unearthed “pyramid”, you can read the articles on this website. There is a book in the making about this theory; it turns history upside down as we know it. It won’t be very popular among the mainstreamers, like historians who believe in Mythos stories and have no idea what the Logos is about.

Other Yet Unearthed Structures

Examples of other yet unearthed structures (foundations) in Mexico. The probability these are NOT foundations of ancient structures is 1 to 770 billion. The location is deliberately not yet published.

Who Takes the Challenge?

The chances for two independent objects to share exactly the same orientation pattern are low. To share their orientation with a mathematical proven geographic pole is even lower. And finally, to have a base of the same size as Khufu’s pyramid makes it even more probable it’s an ancient structure of that same size. But it has been destroyed or was never finished.

Archaeologists, take your shovels with you and go find it in the desert of Southern Egypt! The location is given at the bottom of this article. Who takes the challenge?

If there is something there, it shows that the theory is able to predict and therefore most probably correct. But that will turn so much upside down, that we are not assured that historians, scholars, governments, archaeologists, and so on will cheat on the game. They have been caught cheating before. Why has the Vatican a secret archive? Because it contains secrets that can not bear the light of day.

If there are tips and tricks to overcome this problem, please leave a comment below with your suggestion(s).

The Nabta Playa Calendar Circle is Oriented to Geo Pole III

The Nabta Playa Calendar Circle deviates just one degree from the square contours you see below. The calender circle was oriented to the equinox between 210,000 and 225,000 years ago and meant to allocate Winter and Summer solstice.

Specifications

Item
Location
22.5335N, 30.6995E
Dimensions
225m
Orientation
-22° (or 338°)
Estimated age
210,000 – 225,000 years

Size and Orientation of the Foundation

The contours of the “hill” are oriented in the same direction as the Nabta Playa Calendar Circle, it is square shaped, and has almost the same dimensions as Khufu’s pyramid.
 
© 2016 by Buildreps

The True Age of Chichen Itza

El Castillo (Kukulcan) is the towering icon of Chichen Itza. Just recently an older pyramid was discovered underneath El Castillo. The pyramids seem to be criss-cross oriented. The different monuments on Chichen Itza appear to be oriented to different former geographic poles. Monuments have been reoriented following several shifts of the Earth’s crust.

Fig. 1: The monuments on Chichen Itza are seemingly criss-cross oriented. What can they tell us about the ancient past? 

What is Chichen Itza?

Chichen Itza is believed to be one of the most important Mayan cities. The site is located on the Yucatán Peninsula in Mexico. The Pyramid of Kukulcan, also called El Castillo, is the towering icon of Chichen Itza.

It is also believed the city was built by the Mayans around 600 AD. Recent excavations show there are structures underneath the current ground level, which suggests that the site could be much older than always thought.

Fig. 2: Chichen Itza is located at the tip of Yucatan. The monuments of the site correlate with the ancient poles with towering high probabilities. Coincidence can be excluded.

In former articles is shown how a large collection of pyramids and ancient temples (>535) around the world reveal the locations of former geographic poles. The method is purely mathematical, which reveals the locations of former geographic poles with probabilties of more than 99.99%. It is crucial to grasp the whole concept to understand this article.

Chichen Itza has a collection of pyramids and buildings which are seemingly criss-cross oriented. Why is the site so chaotic organised? What prevented the builders to built a logical, cardinally oriented city?

When pyramids would be oriented to a former geographical pole, like shown in former articles, it suddenly starts to make sense. How long ago could this former pole have been there? Not 1,500 years ago, because such a global catastrophic event wouldn’t pass by unnoticed. We are talking about hundreds of thousands of years ago. A stunning conclusion.

Just recently researchers discovered another pyramid beneath El Castillo. El Castillo was built upon an older pyramid, which on its turn was built on again an older pyramid, but the orientation of their foundations never changed.

One of the Best Available Maps of Chichen Itza

Fig. 3: This is one of the best maps of Chichen Itza
Fig. 4: All monuments on Chichen Itza are measured on their orientation. The amount of monuments which cross one of the nodes along the 47.1W is exceedingly high.

Chichen Itza Follows the Shifting Crust

After analyzing the list of fig. 4 it appears that the monuments of Chichen Itza were not built during the same period. They were built during subsequent periods.
A staggering amount of monuments, 37 of the total 46, were oriented to one of the former geographic pole positions.
The oldest peak of this specific culture is between 240,000 and 270,000 years old, and is related to Pole IV. You might want to read the extensive article on the main page to understand this conclusion.
The culture which built the first series of monuments, like the pyramid of Kukulkan, survived the cataclysm when the crust moved from position IV to position III.

Resume

Pole Amount Probability Age (kyears)
I 6 99.6689% 0-26
II 4 95.1491% 130-155
III 10 99.9998% 210-225
IV 17 100.0000% 240-270
V 0 330-345
No Pole 9  
After the crust stabilized at position III the culture started to built a new series of monuments known as the Thousand Columns Group or Grupo Mil Columnas.
These monuments were dominantly oriented to Pole III and less dominantly to Pole II and Pole I. The tradition, after each cataclysm, to built new monuments and to orient them to the new pole, appears to be a gold mine to date this site.

How Coincidences Fade Away When Clusters Grow

Fig. 5: The probability that 5 of the 8 buildings of Chichen Itza are oriented by accident to one or more of the mathematical nodes is less than 0.2%. When we process all 46 buildings (which would be invisible in this graph due to the small probability) on Chichen Itza we find that the monuments correlate for 99.99970% with the shifting crust pattern. That, of course, is no coincidence. It proves that Chichen Itza’s history extends over more than 270,000 years.| © 2016-2018 Buildreps

Chichen Itza Was Reconstructed

Fig. 6: Chichen Itza was in a dilapidated state and covered with tons of earth. It has been restored in the early 20th century. How old is Chichen Itza really? How many times could it have been restored before? Were the “Mayans” not the builders, but the restorers? 
Fig. 7: The pyramids of Giza are perfectly aligned to the CURRENT geographical pole. Why is El Castillo not?

Why is Chichen Itza Oriented Like This?

Most people, including archaeologists, have never paid any attention to the phenomenon of structural (cardinal) orientations, and might ask: “what do you mean with oriented like this?

If you take a look at the pyramids of Giza, Borobudur, or the Taj Mahal to name just a few among the many, you will notice one specific thing:

  • They are perfectly oriented to the current geographical pole.

Why? Because every important temple or pyramid is aligned to true North (cardinally aligned).

So, why is El Castillo oriented in this way? And why is El Caracol, an astronomical observatory, oriented like this? And why are only 6 of the 46 monuments on Chichen Itza cardinally oriented? And why are they not all oriented in the same direction?

The answer is in the numbers. It is the undisputed proof of their true age.

Most Observatories Are Cardinally Oriented

  • Harvard College Observatory (Cambridge)
  • Whitin Observatory (Wellesley)
  • Holcomb Observatory and Planetarium (Indianapolis)
  • Allegheny Observatory (Pittsburgh)
  • Dyer Observatory (Brentwood)
  • Bradley Observatory (Decatur)
  • Yerkes Observatory (Williams Bay)
  • Chamberlin Observatory (Denver)
  • Sommers-Bausch Observatory (Boulder)
  • Mount Laguna Observatory (San Diego)
  • Haleakala Observatory (Maui)
  • Big Bear Solar Observatory (Big Bear City)

Many cities in the US, like Los Angelos, Chicago, Houston, and Phoenix are mainly North-South oriented (cardinally aligned). Why is that? If the cities aren’t cardinally oriented, like New York, or Philadelphia there was a geographic reason for it, like coastlines, rivers, old highways, or mountains ranges. If nothing obstructs you, is a cardinal orientation the only logical thing to do.

For an observatory seems a cardinal orienatation also the only logical thing to do, although these days with modern GPS system, it isn’t necessary anymore to orient the directions. But it is still thedefault value of good mastery, comparable with the use of terminology between professionals.

A good architect doesn’t design only a functional building, but also a building that is adjusted to the seasonal influences, like the incidence of light, and like the orientation to the rising and setting sun. Most architects have a deep desire to orient North-South or East-West. When an architect designs an observatory, what would be the main things this architect would take into account?

  1. Stability (vibrations disturb the study of celestial bodies)
  2. Clarity of the atmosphere (pollution disturbs a clear view)
  3. Orientation (orientation is crucial to distinguish which object is where)

An Example – Orientation of the Harvard Observatory

Fig. 8: The only ‘rational’ oriented building in this area is the Harvard Observatory – it is oriented to true North. It is denoted by the circle. But why is it oriented like this? This way of orienting takes more space and is more expensive.

Was Chichen Itza an Astronomical Observatory?

El Castillo was once cardinally oriented. A very long time ago. Every pyramid was once cardinally oriented. Or still, like the pyramids of Giza are now.

The site of Chichen Itza is one big astronomical observatory that has been rebuilt and reconstructed hundreds of millennia ago, after a series of major global catastrophes. But the foundations never changed its orientation. The renovations were done on top of the old foundations – a practice which we still apply today.

After every earth crust displacement, which was a catastrophe over an extended period of time, was the site restored and extended with again new pyramids which were oriented to again a new geographical pole.

Fig. 9: El Castillo is the towering icon of Chichen Itza. It was once cardinally aligned.

#1 – Orientation of El Castillo

El Castillo is the towering icon as well as the main attraction of Chichen Itza. El Castillo is perfectly square. It doesn’t seem to discriminate any of the four cardinals.

El Castillo has been built on top of another, older pyramid that is orientated in the same way. That’s something that archaeologists only recently discovered.

It is a so called step pyramid with stairs on four sides and a plateau with a ‘temple’ on top. The four flights of stairs consist of 91 steps each, plus the platform as the last step. In total has El Castillo 365 (4×91+1) steps, as many as there are days in a year. The pyramid is 30 meters high, including the ‘temple’. The pyramid is obviously related to one solar cycle.

We are actually talking about the orientation of the foundation of El Castillo. El Castillo was renovated by our modern society at the beginning of the 20th century. It was probably renovated many, many times before that, by our ancient ancestors. It has always been renovated upon that same old foundation, which was still oriented to a very ancient North pole.

The Location of an Ancient North Pole

Fig. 10: The orientation of El Castillo points to one of the mathematical nodes (RED DOT) which reveals a former geo Pole. These former poles are mathematically proven, that means that the foundations of El Castillo are VERY old. | © 2016-2018 Buildreps

Same Time Frame as El Castillo (#1) – A Selection

Site
Country
GPS Coordinates
Bearing
Intersection point with Reference Line
Great Pyramid of Cholula
Mexico
19.0575N, 98.3019W
25
63.7N, 45W
Comalcalco
Mexico
18.2780N, 93.2006W
22
65.2N, 45W
Uxmal
Mexico
20.3583N, 89.772W
21
65.8N, 45W
Fig. 11: A selection of 3 out of 64 ancient structures (from the database) spread all over the world which are oriented to the same location. The odds that 64 randomly spread structures cross that same small area is less than 0.000000735%.

#2a – The Base of El Caracol

Fig. 11: The base of El Caracol is oriented to an even more ancient position of the North pole. The base was built during the shifitng crust. El Caracol was an astronomical observatory. These structures are in most cases cardinally oriented. | © 2016-2018 Buildreps

#2b – Orientation of the TOP of El Caracol

Fig. 12: The TOP of El Caracol is clearly diverging from the base. The TOP has been cardinally reoriented after the base was built during a period of crustal unrest. | © 2016-2018 Buildreps

Correlation Between Earth Crust Shifts and Ice Ages

Fig. 13: The correlations between crustal shifts and periods of glaciations are clear. The crust shift is the sudden drop of temperature. The larger the drop, the larger the crustal shift. It correlates to the Milankovitch cycles as well. | © 2015-2018 Buildreps

Ice Ages Were Earth Crust Displacements

In this comprehensive former article is explained why the Milankovitch cycles correlate to ice ages. Earth crust displacements correlate to the ‘descending edge’ of the glaciation graphs, and correlate one to one with the Milankovitch cycles.

We are in fact talking about one and the same thing:

  • Latitudinal Earth Crust Displacements = Ice Ages
  • Ice Ages = Eccentric Orbit of Earth
  • Eccentric Orbit Earth = Latitudinal Earth Crust Displacements

Humanity is much older than we have learned at school. The paradigm of “history”, imprinted in our brains from our early youth, is nothing more than an additional veil of ignorance.

© 2016-2018 by Buildreps

First published: March 7, 2016

Why the Ruins of Conimbriga Were Not Built by Romans

Across Europe are countless numbers of Roman settlements allegedly built by Romans. Take for example the Ruins of Conimbriga, it is believed they would have been built by the Romans. But new research shows why that is unlikely.

Fig. 1: A detail of Conimbriga. Note the new stone layers on top of the older stone layers. They are not of the same kind. This suggests that the site is renovated by Romans on top of older foundations, similar as we see in many other Roman settlements like Baalbek.

Who Built Conimbriga?

The answer to that question seems to be an easy one. Look it up in history books, and you will find: “Conímbriga is one of the largest Roman settlements excavated in Portugal.”

Wikipedia says about these ancient ruins: “Like many archaeological sites, Conímbriga was evolved sequentially and built up by successive layers, with the primary period of occupation beginning in the 9th century; during this period the area was occupied by a Castro culture.” Another page on Wikipedia tells you that the Roman empire ceased to exist around the 5th century AD.

Why do we have to excavate something that is just about 2,000 years ago? Most people think that 2,000 years is old, because they cannot comprehend much beyond their own limited lifespan. They tend to think 2,000 is very ancient, and so excavation sounds plausible. It’s not plausible, because most people, even Geologists, have no idea how soil builds up over time.

The global average rate for soil to build up is only about 1 inch per 1,000 years. An alleged Roman settlement which has been excavated from a depth of some 10 feet is way over 100,000 years old.

It’s time to wake up!

How Old Are Ground Layers?

Chronostratigraphy is the branch of stratigraphy that studies the age of rock strata in relation to time. It can tell us something about how deep a construction can be in relation to its age. It’s not a precise indicator, but it can filter out some of the rubbish.

Fig.2: How old could these deepest Mayan ruins be? Based upon the ground specs they are at least 500,000 years old. 

For example if we have to dig up the ground floors of an ancient building somewhere between 20 and 30 feet deep, how old could that be? It depends of the type of soil.

If you look for example into the depth-time relation of an average peatland you will find at a depth of about 10 feet remains of an age of about 5,000 years.

The deeper you go, the firmer the ground becomes, the longer compression takes. In the same peatlands you will find at a depth of about 20 feet remains of an age of about 25,000 years. It gives an indication how soil compression proceeds. Note that you cannot draw rock solid conclusions from this yet, but it gives some indications.

It also gives us confirmations of what we already knew from the orientation patterns.

Deep Excavations in Solid Terrain

If we do the same in more solid, rocky terrain you will see that at the same depth of about 10 feet things are much older. At 10 feet depth these sediments can be easily 300,000 years old.

Regarded from the mainstream paradigm it would be a problem when we find ancient constructions or findings at that depth in that kind of soil. Geologists are not funding to do any examinations which could harm the paradigm of archaeology.

If we look around the world, at the countless ancient structures which were excavated, we see that most ancient structures had to be excavated from layers which are many hundreds of thousands of years old.

Fig. 3: Not many people know that Teotihuacan was covered with a thick layer of sediments, while archaeologists tell us it’s 1800 years old. If that would be true the site would be covered with only 1 or 2 inches of soil. It took 75 years to remove the soil. 

Is Our Ancient History Falsified?

Across Europe are numerous Roman settlements found. Take for example the Ruins of Conimbriga. According to historians they would have been built by the Romans. But new research shows why that is impossible

This new research shows crystal clear that the Roman era simply overtook much older cultures, destroyed it, made it their own and presented the remains as if it was theirs. It seems that the Romans stood at the cradle of one the biggest fabrications and falsifications in history.

It shows us clearly that the rise and fall of the Roman empire, the successive rise of the sheer unlimited power of the Vatican, and the falsification of our history on a grand scale are related. Let’s not forget the Spanish conquistadors who under the flag of the same Catholic church destroyed complete cultures in Latin America.

That were not some minor raids, these were large scale, well organized invasions to destroy and cover up our ancient history as good as possible.

Sedimentation Rates – Observed Relations Between Age and Depth

Region
Depth / 100,000 years
Central Asia
3.75-5.00 m (11-15 ft)
Central China
6.70 m (20 ft)
Central Europe / Alps
1.00 m (3 ft)
North East America
0.90-1.00 m (3 ft)
Colorado Texas
0.80-0.87 m (2.5-3ft)
Low Lands South of Hudson Bay
42.00 m (120 ft)
 Note: when monuments are left undisturbed these rates will approximately apply. When monuments are regularity visited the monuments won’t get covered that easily with soil.

This table above shows you have to be aware about the location where ruins are found. The type of soil determines the relation between depth and age, and there is a logic to it that most people will understand intuitively.

You might drown in a swamp, but not on rocky ground. That says something about how deep you find ancient ruins. On most solid rocky soils, it takes more than 100,000 years before an ancient building is covered with about 3 feet of sediments. Keep that in mind.

The Carbon Dating Method is Very Unstable

Interestingly enough, when the 14C dating method is involved in determining the age of specific ground layers, the ratio between depth and age suddenly jumps with a factor between 20 and 40. These are indications that the 14C dating methods are involved in a delusion of the facts.

When this method was introduced in the late 1940s, many archaeologists jumped a hole in the clouds because they hoped that ancient artefacts between a few hundreds down to about 60,000 years old could be dated much more accurately. But there are many reasons why this method is highly unreliable.

Radiocarbon dating is, how it’s being used today, an extremely sophisticated hoax that supports and even reinforces the agenda of historical falsifications. That statement doesn’t fall just from the sky. We have found profound proof for that, which, after verification, will be published at a later date.

An Example of a Problem: Rock Wall in Texas

Fig. 4: The Rockwall at Rock Wall in Texas is much older than 100,000 years.

Rock Wall Texas

Take for example the Rockwall at Rock Wall in Texas. Most Americans have never heard of this very ancient wall, although it should take a whole chapter in the history books. But that would destroy much of the established carefully defended paradigms.

Parts of Rock Wall had to be dug up from a depth ranging from 10 up to 40 feet. It was discovered by accident in the midst of the 19th century. Even today there is not much knowledge about this wall. The depth at which the wall was found indicates it is much older than 100,000 years.

From the orientation patterns of the upper parts of this ancient construction we can conclude it is at least between 240,000 and 270,000 years old. The deeper parts are probably much older, but we have no information about them yet.

Note also that all findings of this age are out of scope of the 14C method.

The paradigm Stone age, Bronze age, and Iron age – an idea for which no one seems to be responsible – does not allow (yet) a sophisticated and highly organized society way beyond 100,000 years ago. This paradigm is heavily defended.

A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.

— Max Planck

Back to Conimbriga – the Site Plan

Fig. 5: Conimbriga seems to be criss-cross oriented, but when we measure and process the orientations of the main buildings something astonishing happens.

About Conimbriga’s Site Plan

The criss-cross orientation of the buildings at Conimbriga seem to be nothing special. But when we correlate the buildings on this site they correlate with the current and former geographic poles.

Geology tells us the geographic pole did not move over the last one million years, which is also one of the highly defended paradigms. But the odds are a whopping 1 to 2.98×1016 that geologists are right about their ideas of a fixed crust. Greenland shifted over the North Pole and that is the reason why Greenland is (still) covered in ice.

It’s not difficult to understand once you see it.

How large are the odds that the orientation of the ruins of Conimbriga correlate for 83% with the proven geo poles? That includes our current geographic North pole.

We can sort this out mathematically.

Five Geographic Poles Over the Last 340,000 Years

Fig. 6: The Earth’s crust was deformed due to an oscilating force which was generated by a high eccentric orbit of the Earth around the Sun. The four former poles are mathematically proven. For example Pole II: 1 to 2.98×1016. Of all possibilities is Conimbriga correlating with this pattern. It suggests that Conimbriga has been reoriented, but can we prove that?

How the Site Correlates to Former Geographic Poles

Fig. 7: The site of Conimbriga correlates with Pole I, Pole II, and Pole IV. 

The Probabilities That Ruins Coincidentally Correlate With Current and Ancient Poles

Building nr.
Orientation Ruin
Match? Pole
1
-30°
Y
IV
2
-40°
N
3
-13°
Y
 II
4
Y  I
5
-32°
Y
 IV
6
-14°
Y
 II

Why Conimbriga is Much Older

The probability for one of the monuments of Conimbriga to correspond with the current or one of the former geographic poles is 7 to 22. Of the 6 measured main structures are 5 corresponding with one of the nodes and only one not.

The probability for that pattern to be coincidental 1 to 75 or 1.33%. Hence are we for more than 98.5% certain that the site corresponds with the shifting crust, and is therefore much older. The oldest nodes to which the site relates is between 240,000 and 270,000 years old. That is the most probable true age of the original site.

© 2015-2018 by Buildreps

Lost Civilizations: Mathematical Proof of an Unbelievable Reality (Part III)

Part 3 of this series will show you with a series of animations how Earth Crust Shifts stunningly relate to the glaciation graphs over the last 340,000 years.

The civilizations which are related to these eras are hundreds of thousands years old. Remember one thing; it is NOT about the top structures, most of them are renovated many times, like we renovate our homes once in a while, it is about the ORIENTATION of the FOUNDATIONS. When this purely mathematical entity is processed in large numbers, this unbelievable reality unfolds, and tells a whole story.

New, ground breaking research has found out that Earth Crust Shifts, Ice Ages, and ancient structures like pyramids and temples are closely related. This new theory proves mathematically 4 former geographic poles with certainties from 99.99% and higher.

The certainties of the position of the last two poles are incredible high: 1 to 2.98 quadrillion for Pole II and 1 to 95 billion for Pole III that they are formed coincidental. The truth is out there – it is mathematical and not materialistic. Welcome in a new paradigm of scientific thinking!

Enjoy!

Own Hosted Version:

Youtube Version:

Lost Civilizations: Pyramids, Atlantis, and the Shifting Crust (Part II)

This series of videos is a precursor of the book “Atlantis is Here”. The video starts with the simple question why Greenland is covered in ice. This simple question has never been sufficiently answered by mainstream science.

New, ground breaking research has found out that Earth Crust Shifts, Ice Ages, and ancient structures like pyramids and temples are closely related. This new theory proves mathematically 4 former geographic poles with certainties from 99.99% and higher.

The certainties of the position of the last two poles are incredibly high: 1 to many trillions that the found orientation clusters of ancient structures on Greenland are coincidentally formed.

The crust never shifted so wildly as Hapgood suggested in his theory. The earth had major shifts over the last 340,000 years. Hapgood also suggested that the crust shifted in the longitudinal direction. That also didn’t took place. The crust shifted in the latitudinal direction, which is a direct cause of the fact that earth is a rotating sphere. Every reaction to an external force takes place in the perpendicular direction of the rotational direction. The force in this case is oscillating gravity field when the Earth is in a high eccentric orbit around the Sun. That is the reason why the two graphs, eccentricity and ice ages, match perfectly to each other.

This video has been brought out as a precursor of the book, because I think it is important to know for the general public. It will still take at least a year for the book to come out.

Own Hosted Version:

Youtube Version:

Lost Civilizations: Greenland, the Geo Pole, and Ice Ages (PART I)

This is the first video in a series of videos. The series is a precursor of the book “Atlantis is Here”. The video starts with the simple question why Greenland is covered in ice. This simple question has never been sufficiently answered by mainstream science.

New, ground breaking research has found out that Earth Crust Shifts, Ice Ages, and ancient structures like pyramids and temples are intimately entangled. This new theory proves mathematically 4 former geographic poles with certainties of 99.99% and higher.

The crust never shifted so wildly as Hapgood suggested in his theory. The earth had major shifts over the last 340,000 years. Hapgood also suggested that the crust shifted in the longitudinal direction. That also didn’t took place.

The crust shifted in the latitudinal direction, which is a direct cause of the fact that earth is a rotating sphere, similar as a spinning top which reacts on an external force. This external force is a high eccentric orbit around the Sun, which causes a large tidal oscillation. That is the reason why the curves of eccentricity and ice ages fit one on one onto each other.

Enjoy!

Own Hosted Version:

 

Youtube Version:

 

© 2017 by Mario Buildreps

 

 

Earth Crust Shifts Animation

Animation of a Shifting Geographic Pole

It is for many people hard to imagine that a geographic pole, that is to say the crust, can shift and deform. Mainstream science says it is impossible. They say there is no evidence. It apparently isn’t impossible and the evidence is all over the place but hasn’t been properly recognized and interpreted as such.

Science interprets it as ‘ice ages’ or better glaciation cycles as something which is caused by variation in CO2, while glaciation cycles were crustal deformations; the proof is in the numbers. Most new scientific discoveries are done by using the power of mathematics, and not just by digging somewhere in the ground or proposing wild ideas with some evidence. This animation gives an indication of the involved ancient structures spread around the world which are used to find and to prove the locations of these ancient poles. The mathematics behind it is very powerful and precise.

The Older a Pole, the Higher the Uncertainties

Note that the older a pole becomes, the harder it is to prove, which has a few reasons:
  1. the older a pole the older the structures. The older the structures the less is left from them.
  2. the older a pole, the more shifts the crust had to endure. The orientation of the ancient structures became less accurate which you can see in the growing red dot.
  3. the larger a mathematical node (the red dot) becomes the more structures you need to prove that pole, but these structures are very hard to find.

These are the main reasons why the probabilities of the four former geographic poles decreases. What is clear and even stunning is the consistency of the found mathematical patterns. All proof and evidence is pointing in the same direction, to an inevitable conclusion. Crustal shift in the latitudinal direction are real, and they relate to glaciation cycles. Ancient structures, hence our ancestors, are showing us the way.

The locations where Humanity simultaneously appeared to have developed:

  • China,
  • the region of Iraq, Iran and Syria (Sumer),
  • the region of Northwest Africa (Marocco, Western Sahara)
  • Peru,
  • Mexico, Guatemala, and Belize.
Fig. 1: Earth Crust Displacements over the last 350,000 years. The crust has shifted four times (five poles) in the latitudinal direction. Over 535 ancient structures, from pyramids and temples, to ancient ruins are used to locate the former poles and to prove the shifting crust. You might now understand why Greenland is covered in ice, and why it is melting. You now might also understand why ancient civilizations were lost multiple times, how the myths of the deluges came about. | © Buildreps 2015-2017.

Probabilities of these Pole Positions

The positions of these poles are not just some lines drawn to a few points, they are the result of extensive calculations and powerful mathematics. The ancient structures are independently spread from one another. The method says the following about the orientation of a building; it can be uniquely positioned within 90 degrees in regard to the current geographic pole, 45 degrees Eastward and 45 degrees Westward.

When we mass process the data we find massive nodes in a vertical line over Greenland. The probabilities of these nodes to be formed coincidental are*:

  • Pole I (0-26 ka): 1 to 1 to 1.79×1021;
  • Pole II (130-155 ka): 1 to 2.98×1016;
  • Pole III (210-225 ka): 1 to 9.51×1010;
  • Pole IV (240-270ka): 1 to 1.36×108;
  • Pole V (335-360ka): 1 to 22,423.

That means we can be very certain, between 99.996% up to 100%, that these poles (the red dots) are:

  • correctly positioned;
  • of the correct size.

The same counts for the age of the geographic poles. The magnitude of the shifts correspond so accurate to the temperature jumps of the glaciations graphs that we can claim a correct time frame with 99.99987% certainty.

You can draw your own conclusions what that means. Mathematics, as the Queen of Science, shows us the way.

*latest data February 2018.

 

© 2017 by Mario Buildreps

About the Author

You came here because you are interested who constructed this new, controversial theory about our ancient history.

The author, nicknamed Mario Buildreps, is a successful former businessman, and also a graduate engineer. His engineering skills appear to be fruitful, not only for technical jobs, but also for the newly discovered truth about our ancient history. He discovered that orientation of ancient structures around the world follow a pattern, a mind boggling mathematical pattern.

Mario is an independent researcher and dedicates his time to what he calls “finding the truth”. There are no stakeholders involved nor has it anything to do with the upcoming fame thanks to this new groundbreaking theory. Only Love for the Truth is what makes him thrive.

My recent discoveries, which are done outside of the official scientific community, revealed astounding insights, into how geographic polar movements and ancient structures are intimately entangled.

Our ancient history, including a vast amount of ancient buildings, is at least 350,000 years old. That is not just an empty statement, no, it is backed up by a large amount of data and mathematical certainties. It appears to be that the work done by archaeologists, scholars, and historians over many decades revealed nothing about the truth of Humanity.

Why We Only Need Mathematics

Whether we zoom in on atoms of the chair we are sitting on, or the flesh of our bodies, everything is composed of basically the same thing; atoms, with protons and neutrons in the nucleus. When we zoom in further we find only vibrations. Vibrations are solely mathematical.

I am 100% certain that everything is ultimately mathematical, and I’m therefore also sure that we can express everything mathematically. To express things mathematically doesn’t count only for Quantum Mechanics or General Relativity, but also for our origin and our history. But that this doesn’t seem this way at first hand is caused by our deep conditioned state we are in due to our ‘educative’ training. We’ve learned that mathematics is just a tool, an abstract tool to get answers from. On top of that, are our senses completely unable to “probe” the invisible noumena, that underlies at everything we call matter. We lack organs of truth. That’s why we’re so drawn into empiricism and materialism.

Check for yourself this question: Why has every successful scientific theory mathematics at its core? Wouldn’t that be because the underlying driver itself is mathematical? What else could it be?

If we follow the path of mathematics blindly we unlock the most unbelievable truths of life. That is what the book “Atlantis is Here” is all about, unlocking our consciousness by showing the reality of things that science, religions, education, parenting, and politics have covered with blankets of ignorance over the centuries.

The book which is now in the making under the working title called “Atlantis is Here” will set many things straight:

– the true age of ancient structures;

– the true age and origin of Homo sapiens;

– the codes encrypted in many pyramids like Giza and Teotihuacan but also many others, and where they are pointing to;

– the mathematical relations between pyramids, temples, and dolmens around the world;

– why and how civilizations were lost multiple times;

– mathematical proof that ice ages were earth crust shifts and the cause of high civilizations to vanish;

– a scientific account for the cause of earth crust shifts;

– why CO2 is not the cause of global warming and lies at the basis of a grand hoax;

Many people feel there is something not right, but since science tells them what they have to think, it’s more or less end of story. Science is seemingly untouchable. Not anymore. The book will unlock and untangle many subjects that so many people are longing for. It is fully mathbased and it will be readable for most of us.

The title “Atlantis is Here” might change, the main thing the book wants to address is that you don’t have to look for Atlantis somewhere. It is right under our noses, but we fail to see it. It is our own consciousness we have to work on to get the truth out.

The book will support mathematically what so many people are already feeling around the world. It will be published under the pseudonym of Mario Buildreps.

Contact: buildreps@gmail.com

Visual Database Pyramids and Temples

Are You Aware How Many Ancient Buildings There Are in the World?

Not many people are aware how many ancient buildings there actually are around the world. The list is incredibly long, and will never be complete. Around 57% of the ancient buildings, from pyramids, to temples, to complete ancient cities were oriented to one of the ancient geographical poles. Not all buildings were oriented to the cardinals, but most of them were.

Yes, the crust moved. It moved significantly. But it never moved abruptly like Charles Hapgood believed. The crust crawled slowly over tens of thousands of years during Earth’s high eccentric orbit around the Sun.

Science believes it were Ice Ages caused by varying insolation, caused by the Milankovitch cycles. It was the crust that moved very slowly, which is interpreted as glaciation cycles. The Milankovitch cycles do not influence the energetic household of the Earth. But most geologists still don’t seem to understand that, and just believe it without performing any calculations.

New Mathematical Research

You won’t find any other research like this in the world. It’s one of the most intriguing discoveries of the last decades. There were no ice ages seemingly caused by a miracle, it were latitudinal crustal displacements. Pyramids are not a few thousand years old, they are hundreds of thousands years old. Greenland is not melting because of Carbon Dioxide. It’s vast ice sheet was formed at the North Pole, between 110,000 and 270,000 years ago. It’s now located at a place where the ice sheet starts to melt very slowly.

Tragically, not much of the current sciences has the right view on our Planet and on the origin of Humanity, while they believe they are immutably spot on. When no one ever refutes science, while they mainly rely on sources of fellow researchers who were already wrong, science will continue to dig deeper into a cesspool of falsehood.

Instantaneous Proof of Another Paradigm

How old would a structure be when you have to dig for it about 8.5 meters deep, while the stratigraphic records show that the soil builds up between 1 to 1.5 meters per 100,000 years? That’s an elementary school assignment. That structure is then around 650,000 years old. But because the ruling paradigm says that’s impossible it’s simply shifted aside.

This collage of ancient buildings contains about 60% of all the buildings which are in the most intruiging database of ancient buildings that is ever made.

Read the other articles and you might become aware how our history really looks like. Most ancient structures are much older than 100,000 years. That is not just a statement, no, it is mathematically proven with a complete new theory. The odds that the crust shifted, even multiple times, while advanced civilizations like ours were already present, are incredibly high: 1 to 2.98 quadrillion (1 to 29,800,000,000,000,000) that the largest node found on Greenland is coincidental.

In this new theory, which is developed by Mario Buildreps, the orientation of more than 535 ancient structures around the world are measured and mass processed as a pattern. Orientation is a pure mathematical entity, and distills patterns that otherwise would be impossible to find: the true age of Humanity and the massive latitudinal crustal motions which took place which science has interpreted as ice ages.

Scroll through the list and get an idea why this new theory is so powerful – it’s still a fraction of the whole database. The quality of the pics is relatively low, otherwise it would flood the server with traffic. It gives you an idea of the incredible amount of ancient buildings in the world. This is still only a fraction of the total amount of buildings which were once built over the hundreds of thousands of years. Most of them were destroyed by nature, destroyed by humans, flooded, buried, collapsed, crumbled, or else.

The orientation of the is ALL we need to prove the truth of OUR collective ancient history.

Enjoy scrolling!

A visual database of pyramids and temples around the world. Have you ever seen such a list? Here it is.

The Database – How it Works

This list contains the names of the ancient sites which are in the database. The database still grows with the addition of new ancient monuments. Some ancient sites contain many differently oriented monuments while others have only uniformly oriented monuments like for example Teotihuacan. Despite the fact it is a massive site, it appears only one time in the database, because it is uniformly oriented. While Chichen Itza contains many different oriented monuments and was built, used, and renovated over a much longer period. Chichen Itza was therefore actively used even after multiple cataclysms. Chichen Itza’s monuments follow the migration of the geographic pole with a surgical precision.

The list below contains 356 names of ancient sites, while the whole database* contains currently 538 separate monuments. The habit to reorient religious, astronomical, and energetic buildings due to the deformations of the crust is proven to be a common habit around the ancient world.

Inka Uyu Hellenikon Pyramid Saksaywaman
Acanceh Heraclea Samarra Archaeological City
Acaray Holmul San Andrés
Acozac Huaca Bandera San Gervasio
Aguateca Huaca del Luna Sanam Temple
Ai-Khanoum Huaca del Sol Santa Cecilia Acatitlan
Ain Dara Temple Huaca Esmeralda Sardis Temple of Artemis
Ajanta Caves Huapalcalco Sayil
Ake Inca-Caranqui Sechin Alto
Al-Rahba castle Inka Wasi Segesta (temple)
Allpacoto Ipogei Capparelli Serapeum at Alexandria
Altun Ha Iraq al-Amir Sha’ar HaGolan
Amazon Geoglyphs Ishchali Shahr-e Sukhteh
Angkor Wat Iximche’ Shingardar Stupa
Antipatris Izamal Sintashta
Apadana Izapa Sippar (Sumer)
Arg-é Bam Jebel Barkal Soleb
Asagipinar Jerash Srirangam Temple
Aukana Buddha Temple Ka’ba-ye Zartosht Starosel Tomb
Avdat Kabah Ta Prohm
Baalbek Kaminal Juyu Tabasqueno
Babylon Karnak Takht-e Soleymān
Babylon New Kfar Bar’am synagogue Tamgaly
Bakong Kinichná Tamtoc
Baksei Chamkrong Kohunlich Tanais
Balamku Kom Ombo temple Tarawasi
Bandurria Konark Sun Temple Taukachi-Konkan
Banteay Kdei Koshoy Korgon Tefessedt
Banteay Samré Kotosh Tel Dan
Becan Kuara (Sumer) Tel Kadesh Naftali
Belevi Mausoleum Kuntur Wasi Tell al-Rimah (Taya)
Belvoir Fortress La Campana Tell Brak (Sumer)
Beng Malea La Centinela Temple of Anu and Adad (Assur)
Bijamandal Temple La Joya Temple of Ashur
Bishapur La Quemada Temple of Belur
Bonampak Labna Temple of Horus
Borobudur Lagartero Temple of Nabu
Borsippa Lagartero Temple of Osiris at Abusir
Brihadeeswarar Temple Lamanai Temples of Bagan
Burial complex in Xiadu Lamay Templo Mayor
Burnt City Lambityeco Tenam Puente
Buto Larsa (Sumer) Tenayuca
Cabyle Las Haldas Tenochtitlan
Cacaxtla Leptis Magna Teopanzolco
Cahuachi Little Kyz Kala Teotenango
Calakmul Lol Teotihuacan
Cancuén Los Cancajos Pyramid Tepe Sialk
Capilla Lothal Tepeapulco
Caracol Lubaantun Teti I Pyramid
Caral Lumbini Texcotzingo
Carnac Lurihuasi Thanjavur Brahadeeswarar temple
Casa Blanca Lyrbe The Lianhu Altar
Castillo de Teayo Mari Tikal
Cástulo Masada (Byzantine church) Timgad
Ceibal Mayapan Tiwanaku
Cempoala Medinet Habu temple Tiya
Cerro Colorado Meenakshi Temple Tlatelolco
Cerro de la Estrella Mehrgarh Tomb of Consort Ban
Cerro del Gentil Midhowe Chambered Cairn Tomb of Emperor Ai of Han
Cerro Sechin Miraya Tomb of Emperor Cheng of Han
Chacchoben Mitla Tomb of Emperor Gaozu of Han
Chacmultun Mixco Viejo Tomb of Emperor Hui of Han
Chan-Chan Monte Alban Tomb of Emperor Jing of Han
Chankillo Monte d’Accoddi Tomb of Emperor Ping of Han
Chau Say Tevoda Moral Reforma Tomb of Emperor Wen of Sui
Chavín de Huantar Motya Tomb of Emperor Wu of Han
Chersonesos Mount of Cannae Tomb of Emperor Xiaojing of Tang
Chiapa de Corzo Mundigak Tomb of Emperor Yuan of Han
Chicanná Mungo Tomb of Emperor Zhao of Han
Chichen Itza Nakum Tomb of Empress Dou
Chincha Paracas Platform Mounds Naranjo Tomb of Empress Dowager Bo
Chogha Zanbil Neak Pean Tomb of Empress Fu
Choquequirao Nimrud Tomb of Empress Li
Chupacigarro Nineveh Temple (Sumer) Tomb of Empress Lü
Cobá Niuserra’s Pyramid Tomb of Empress Shangguan
Comalcalco Nohmul pyramid Tomb of Empress Wang
Conimbriga Nuzi (Sumer) Tomb of Empress Wang
Copán Ohoden-Valoga Tomb of Empress Wang
Court of Amenhotep III Ohrid Tomb of Empress Xu
Cueva del Maguey Oxkintok Tomb of Empress Xu
Dainzu Pachacamac Tomb of First Emperor
Daorson Padmanabhaswamy temple Tomb of King Ling of Zhou
Der (Sumer) Palenque Tomb of Marquis Zhang Ao
Djedefre’s Pyramid Pallka Tomb of Three Kings of Zhou
Donegal Palmyra Toniná
Dur-Katlimmu Pampa de Las Llamas Túcume
Dur-Kurigalzu Pañamarka Tula
Dzibanche Pando Tzintzuntzan
Dzibilchaltun Pella Uchkus Inkañan
Dzibilnocac Peralta Umma
Eastern Mebon temple Phnom Bakheng Uruk
Ecbatana Phnom Chisor Usnu
Edzna Pikillaqta Uxmal
Ek’ Balam Plazuelas Vichama
El Cerrito Pomac Forest Vikramashila
El Chanal Pompeii Volubilis
El Mirador Prambanan Wak’a Wallamarka
El morro del tulcán Prasat Phum Prasat Wanuku Pampa
El Paraiso Pre Rup Wari Willka
El Paraíso Preah Ko Wayland’s Smithy
El Tajín Preah Vihear Temple West Baray
El Tazumal Pucará de Tilcara West Kennet Long Barrow
El Tepozteco Puma Punku Xcambo
El Tigre Pyramid of Djoser Xelha
Elephantine Pyramid Pyramid of Koh-Ker Xlapak
Era de Pando Pyramid Sinki Xochicalco
Eridu Pyramids of Cochasqui Xochitecatl
Eshnunna (Sumer) Pyramids of Giza Xpuhil
Estakhr Q’umarkaj Xunantunich
Ggantija temple Qasr el-Sagha Yagul
Girsu Quiahuiztlán Yapahuwa Temple
Gorgippia Qumran Yaxchilan
Great Kyz Kala Ramesseum Yaxha
Great Pyramid of Cholula Raqch’i Yeha
Great Ziggurat of Ur Resafe Yunatsite
Guachimontones Rockwall Zabala (Sumer)
Gunung Padang Ruins at Ur Zaculeu
Harappa Sahure’s Pyramid Ziggurat of Assur
Hattusa Saint-Michel tumulus

*February 2018

 

© 2015-2018 by Mario Buildreps

 

A Visual Idea What Happens After a Crustal Shift

Why we Only Find Stone Structures Around the World

This short video explains elegantly what happens when our current civilization would vanish from the face of the Earth. Stone structures are virtually the only remains we would find.

Structures like the Chinese Wall and the pyramids of Giza, and the countless other structures which are not made from steel reinforced concrete, will remain standing for hundreds of thousands of years. And these structures suggest that Earth was once inhabited by an advanced ancient civilization. Dating these structures would appear to be virtually impossible. For example the White House and the Vatican which are both oriented to our current Geographic pole would possibly leave some traces, mainly the orientation of their foundations, that could tell something about this lost civilization.

Would we find much remains of the 7.5 billion people? Possibly not so much, since huge tidal waves literally washed the continents clean, megaquakes swallowed up complete buildings into the deep, and volcano eruptions burned many of the rest that was left. It was one of the many rejuvenation cycles of the Earth.

The new species would swear they arose from an ice age. The path of developing tools could possibly run similar as we think it went with our species – stone age, bronze age, iron age.

If our civilization vanished due to a crustal shift we would be able to trace back what could have happened by examining the orientation of foundations of the remaining buildings. That is to say if this civilization is both spiritually and intellectually advanced enough.

Just digging into the ground delivers very interesting artefacts and might reveal more information about some foundations, but determining the true age of these structures would be awesomely difficult, if not impossible, without introducing advanced mathematics. Examining the orientation of many buildings, at a mass scale all around the world of our lost civilization, would reveal the truth.

Relax and have a great watch!

 

How Old Are Pyramids Around the World?

New research proves that most pyramids and temples around the world were built before fatal earth crust shifts. The orientation of large amounts of pyramids reveal former geographic poles. The proof has been delivered mathematically that the correlations are coincidental. Most pyramids are much older than always was assumed, way beyond our imagination.
Fig. 1: Pyramids are believed to be not older than a few thousand years. They appear to be in some cases even older than 250,000 years, proven with a new mathematical theory. | © 2016 by Buildreps

Common Used Dating Methods

Determining the age of a pyramid is not as simple as it appears to many people. Most people believe that archaeologists are absolutely right in their conclusions. But stones cannot be dated to determine the age of the structure, because what the researchers will find is the formation date of the rock material itself, and not when the stones were piled on top of each other.

Scientists believe they have found a reliable way to date stone structures, while they only make associative, assumptive and subjective connections between the organic materials found in and around the buildings. They claim it is reliable, while there’s no way for anyone to validate that claim. We cannot associate one thing to another with absolute certainty.

And that appears to be the major problem in dating any stone structure: validation of the dating methods. There is not a single validation possible to back up any of the claims. Archaeology is very sure about their methods, but a new mathematical dating method suggests that all datings of ancient structures which have been done of the last decades are incorrect.

The most common way is to Carbon date organic artefacts left by ‘builders’ found inside and around pyramids, or organic materials that slipped between the stones. This method of dating is believed to be fairly accurate. It is often claimed as ‘evidence’ of the age of the structure. That appears to be a major mistake.

What is Evidence?

According to the Oxford dictionaries can evidence be defined as: the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.

The words ‘scientific evidence’ are often misused to emphasize a certain belief or to label a certain theory.

We believe that the sun and the moon are the cause of tides on earth. But how do we know that for sure? The only evidence we have are clear patterns between the moon phases, orbits and the tides. From that we are able to develop a theory which predicts what will happen next. When we can verify it multiple times with our senses, we might become more certain the theory is complete and correct.

Proof is the final verdict that removes all doubts whereas evidence only leads one in the direction of a fact or statement. The foundations of pyramids are hundreds of thousands of years old: mathematically proven.

Classifying Pyramids in Time Frames

If we can relate pyramids around the world somehow, can we then classify them in a certain time frame? Yes, it appears we can. And this is the first step to take before we dive into the intimidating mathematicaldetails. We can do that by analyzing the orientation patterns of pyramids spread around the world.

Analyzing the orientation of more than 535 pyramids and temples around the world, made it possible to classify the foundations within certain time frames. The biblical and mythical deluges and the Ice Ages appear to be one and the same event as you will see further on in this article. And it even happened more than once in history.

The occurrence of multiple deluges are also to be found in the translations of the Sumerian tablets. The time frames which are written down in the tablets appear to correlate one on one with the mathematical time frame.

Deluges and Crustal Shifts Are One and the Same Event

Is there evidence for a Deluge? Yes, there is in fact overwhelming evidence for a Great Flood. If we just look at the effects the melting water of the great ice sheets had on the coastlines some 12,000 years ago. All coastlines were flooded around the world because of this melting water.

The sea level rose about 120 meters. There are so many sunken cities all around the planet that it’s easy to understand they are older than 12,000 years. If you imagine that today, this would affect more than 60% of the Human population around the world.

Virtually all cultures speak about deluges in their sagas. Whatever scholars want to say about sagas, or even ridicule them, they hold a deep hidden truth in them. As I will show in this series of articles, the most probable cause of the floods were Earth Crust Shifts. Every shift marks the beginning of a new ice age.

It appears that because pyramids are square they can be used to find mathematical patterns in their orientation, especially when we examine them worldwide at a large scale.

  • Note: with North pole is always meant the geographical North pole. The theory of Earth Crust Shifts is not dealing about the magnetic poles. The geographical pole is the rotation axis of the earth.

Orientation of Giza

Fig. 2: Giza is oriented to our current geo North pole and therefore constructed AFTER the Great Flood. They are older than 4,500 years and younger than 110,000 years. The Giza pyramids are with such a stupendous accuracy oriented to the North pole, that deviations beyond 0.06 degrees are not measurable.

Stupendous Accuracy

The statement that the pyramids of Giza are oriented to the current North pole (cardinally oriented) doesn’t knock people off their feet anymore. More important to know is that Giza is oriented to the current geographic North pole and therefore built after the Great Flood.

A Great Flood which was caused by an Earth Crust Shift which ushered the beginning of the last ice age.

There’s no doubt about the classification of these pyramids: they were built after the latest crustal shift. Which can be interpreted as after the Great Flood. The time frame we have here to classify Giza is between the current estimations, which is 4,500 years, and 26,000 years. That means that nothing which is precisely oriented to our current geographic pole is older than 26,000 years.

Finding Our Current Geo Pole: How Triangulation Works

Fig. 3: The orientation of the pyramids of Giza and the pyramid of Ping of Han (one of the 12 oriented to current North) intersect at the current North pole. They belong to the same time frame.
Fig. 4: This pyramid in China is oriented under an angle of 8 degrees (352 degrees) to Greenland.

Pyramids at Xi’an, China

China has over 300 pyramids which are oriented in just a few groups. Most of the pyramids can be found in the center of China, near Xi’an.

These are real pyramids, that’s for sure. It took scientists many centuries to figure this out. They call them “tombs”, because we’re simply groping in the dark what they were used for. There are people who suggest they were used to focus energy, but that’s all very hard for anyone to verify.

The pyramids in China are massively oriented in just a few different configurations:

Fig. 5: It is not difficult to see that these pyramids were NOT pointed to the current geo North pole, but to Greenland. Were this pyramids built when Greenland was actually located at the North Pole?
  • Oriented to the current North pole;
  • Oriented at an angle of about -8° (to Greenland);
  • Oriented at an angle of about -14 to -15°.

Why are they oriented like this? The precision of the ones which are oriented to the current geographic pole is so precise that the other ones which were oriented towards to Greenland suggest it was not something coincidental. But to prove this requires much more than just a few of these Chinese pyramids. That’s why we collected as much data as we could possibly find.

The 8 degrees oriented Chinese pyramids cluster on a massive scale to the same area as the pyramids of Latin America, and form a enormous mathematical node. The odds for this node to be  coincidental, which we’ve named Pole II, is 1 to 2.98×1016, which is incredibly high.

Pole II for example is proven with 100% accuracy and certainty.

Orientation of Chinese Pyramids

These different orientations of the Chinese pyramids imply that this culture has survived an Earth Crust Displacement. Crustal displacements moved the geographical North pole on Greenland to its current location. Greenland moved to an area where it would start to melt very slowly.

There are pyramids in China which were built before the Great Flood and after the Great Flood. This cultures somehow survived it, adapted to it, and built another series of pyramids oriented to the new, current geo pole.

This would mean that the ones oriented to the current North pole are of the same time frame as the ones of Giza, younger than 26,000 years. But the other ones oriented under an angle of 8° are therefore older than 130,000 years. Yes, there is a huge gap between the stable periods of the geographic pole. The migration of a geographic pole took tens of thousands of years and wiped many advanced civilizations off the face of the Earth.

Is this why this culture is so advanced in medicine, religion, philosophy and many other areas, because it’s so old and the traditions survived the Great Flood?

The whole perspective becomes more interesting when we go to Mexico.

Locations of Some Chinese Pyramids

Oriented to Current Pole (0°)
Oriented to Greenland (8°)
34°23’53″N / 108°42’44″E
34°21’48″N / 108°37’51″E
34°23’26″N / 108°44’21″E
34°21’43″N / 108°38’26″E
34°24’03″N / 108°45’53″E
34°20’18″N / 108°34’10″E
Fig. 6: The pyramids of the Moon (topleft) and the Sun (bottom) at Teotihuacan. They are oriented to Greenland as well.

Pyramids of Teotihuacan, Mexico

One of the most important aspects of scientific evidence is that it is reproducible and verifiable. It’s even better when everyone can look over your shoulder what it is what you’re doing, and talks in simple language.

When we draw a line from the pyramids in China (oriented at 8°) and the pyramids of Teotihuacan in Mexico, the lines will intersect each other on Greenland. This is reproducible and verifiable by anyone who has access to Google Earth. The question we could ask ourselves: what could this mean?

Read in this case the article “Why is Greenland Covered in Ice?” again, and the penny might drop that the pyramids of Mexico and these ones of China are both constructed before the Great Flood. These pyramids were built when the North pole was still on Greenland, and that is a very long time ago.

The crust appears to have shifted like Hapgood suggested only in another way, that is to say latitudinal. The crust didn’t shift as wildly as Hapgood suggested. It shifted slowly over a period of tens of thousands of years. The cultures that built these pyramids are much older than we ever imagined possible. But that would explain a lot, wouldn’t it?

How Teotihuacan and Pyramid Wu of Han Intersect at Greenland

Fig. 7: The orientation of the pyramids in Mexico and China intersect each other exactly on the former North pole on Greenland. This is one of the former geo North poles. By using this method 4 former geo poles are proven.

Verification Data of Intersection Point

Pyramid
Location
Angle
China (Wu of Han)
34.338°N, 108.570°E
352° (360-8)
Mexico (Sun Pyramid)
19.692°N, 98.844°W
15.5°
Intersection Point
73.281°N, 44.246°W

The More Intersections, the More Proof

Just a few intersections like shown above proves nothing. It could be just luck. To rule out any coincidence, the data of 538* ancient constructions and sites were examined and extensively processed. The results are staggering. It smashes all believes about the ancient past in relation to the Earth to pieces.

Since there was already a hunch that Greenland was once located on the North pole, we drew a line over Greenland from the current North pole to the current South pole, at a longitude of 45°W, and calculated roughly the amount of intersections with that reference line. The results were spectacular. Later in the process the exact longitude of this line was calculated to be at a longitude of 47.1°W. The results along this line were even much better.

Former geographic poles revealed themselves sharply at a few locations on Greenland. The probability of this event can be calculated by using the binomial formula. With the used data set, and with the amount of found intersections, the probability on mere chance is less than 0.000000001%. The probability that it was done on purpose, and that it was therefore the former geographic North pole is certain for more than 99.999999999%.

In scientific terms: we can be sure this is true, which has a very deep impact. As you will see, a puzzle starts to fall into place.

The Earth’s crust has shifted in the past, when the civilizations who built ancient pyramids and temples were already present. We are not speaking of a few thousand years ago. We are speaking of periods of hundreds of thousands of years.
* February 2018

The Earth’s Crust Has Shifted Multiple Times in the Past

We can safely claim that Greenland was on the North pole, without having any geological knowledge or evidence. We don’t even have to go anywhere. We don’t need to walk on pyramids, or on glaciers, or to be a specialist in any of these areas. We even don’t need a shred of ‘evidence’. We can now understand why Greenland is melting, and why we find so many mysterious sites around the world, and why these cultures disappeared.

In the book which is currently in the making under the working title “Atlantis is Here”, is the location of this intersection line calculated at a precise location of 47.091°W, for the ease of communication: 47.1°W. It is in this article too far fetched to explain how this figure is accomplished.

The book won’t expose you, like scientists love to do, to intimidating mathematical equations which forms the basis of this new theory. But if you are interested in it, there will be extensive appendices in the book dedicated to the mathematics behind it together with tons of data.

Reference Line to Measure the Amount of Intersections

Fig. 8: When we examine the amount of intersections with the North-South line, we find the former North pole. For the book “Atlantis is Here” the line has been calculated at 47.091 degrees. It delivers 100% proof. Mathematical proof.
 

2016-2018 by Buildreps

 

Teotihuacan: How Old Is It Really?

 

Fig. 1: Teotihuacan is colossal, but no one has an idea who built these pyramids. | © 2016 by Buildreps

Facts About Teotihuacan

Teotihuacan is massive, and no one knows who built it. That’s directly one of the most pressing facts.

There’s already enough said and written about Teotihuacan, so it is pointless to repeat it all over again. There are enough sources to consult. This article will deal with Teotihuacan in a totally other way. A mathematical way.

To get to the core of this impressive giant, it’s necessary to separate believes and assumptions from the facts. The fact is that we actually know nothing about Teotihuacan. Therefore is there not much more to say about Teotihuacan what’s not been said by mainstream outlets.

The only thing that can be done is to measure, and to process the data mathematically, and to see what comes from that.

Teotihuacan Before Restoration

Fig. 2: Teotihuacan before it was restored. Who even knows this today? It looked like a natural hill. The site had to be unearthed like most other Mesoamerican sites, before it was opened to the public. It took 75 years to restore. Did we have to “unearth” the Colosseum in Rome?

What is Real Science?

When you want to enter the terrain of real science, your ideas must be:

  • verifiable to anyone.
  • accessible to anyone.
  • presented in a language understandable for anyone.

When was the last time we were able to verify the data and interpretations from archaeologists and historians? I haven’t seen anything yet, except conservative ideas that came from brooding back rooms.

Fig. 3: The ‘blind men elephant’ test is how sensing thinking types (which most scientists are) would describe an elephant as a whole when they are blindfolded.

Typical Paradigm Problems – the Nampa Figurine

A paradigm is a kind of framework in which a trained professional tends to think and tends to solve encountered problems. Think outside the box is often said in management trainings. How well can scientists think outside the box?

What to do with the mysterious figurine, called the Nampa figurine, drilled up from a depth of about 300 feet?

Geologists say these layers are many millions of years old. Archaeologists say that is impossible.

So, what do we do now? Science is deafening silent. There are some noisy extroverts on sites like badarchaeology.com. In their attempt to debunk this figurine they make a big mess of geology, drilling engineering, and human intelligence as a whole.

With the same kind of logic we could claim dinosaurs alive just a few thousand years ago.

Science is humanities best attempt to describe reality. But there are many reasons to reject many mainstream theories, especially when it comes to our ancient history. There’s simply too much mystery that’s left unexplained or simply ignored, because the paradigm doesn’t allows it to.

Truth is so obscure in these times, and falsehood so established, that, unless we love the truth, we cannot know it.

— Blaise Pascal

Note: the genius Pascal said this already 400 years ago. What reason is there to think it got any better?

Why is Teotihuacan so Differently Oriented?

The pyramids of Teotihuacan belong to the biggest on the planet. The pyramids of Giza are very accurately oriented to the current North pole. This way of orientation is called cardinal orientation. The cardinals are the wind directions North, East, South and West.

Why is Teotihuacan not oriented in the same way as the ones of Giza? Teotihuacan and Giza have even some similarities, like arrangement and the dimensions of the base. There are people who have created amazing complex theories to explain why Teotihuacan is oriented in this strange way.

They always seem to forget about Occam’s Razor, which perfectly states that a theory with the least assumptions is most likely to be the correct one. Only people who don’t like to know the truth claim that Occam’s theory is wrong.

Is there a hidden Pyramid code encrypted in Teotihuacan? Why is Teotihuacan so typically aligned?

Fig. 4: Teotihuacan is built under an angle of about 15.5 degrees in regard to the geographical North pole. The reason why this is done has never been solved, until now. | © 2016 by Buildreps

Teotihuacan Was Once Oriented to An Ancient GEOGRAPHIC North Pole

When we look how the pyramids of Giza are oriented, there’s no sufficient reason to assume that Teotihuacan would be oriented in another way.

There are striking similarities between the two pyramids, like the size of their base and their typical arrangement.

It is in fact very simple. Teotihuacan was once oriented to a geographic North pole on Greenland. Or better, Greenland was once at the North pole, because of serious crustal shifts. And that was a very long time ago.

The odds that this is NOT true is a whopping 1 to 29.8 quadrillion.

It gets even more amazing once you have found the location of this former geo pole. The distance from Teotihuacan to its pole, and the distance from Giza to its pole, that’s our current geo pole, happens to be exactly the same. Teotihuacan was built at exactly the same latitude as Giza – 29.975°.

With this knowledge we are able to reconstruct the deformation of the crust due to the crustal displacements. By using the whole matrix of over 535 ancient structures spread around the world, we were able to reconstruct with advanced mathematics what really happened with the Earth’s crust over the last 440,000 years.

Teotihuacan Was Oriented to a Mathematically Proven GEO Pole

Fig. 5: The analysis of the full dataset delivered spectacular results. The probabilities are very high and on top of that are the center latitudes of the nodes corresponding with temperatures changes of the last glaciation cycles. The odds that the relation of the distances between the nodes and the temperature changes is purely coincidental is 1 to 750,000. It is the ultimate mathematical proof.

How the Movement of the Geographic Pole is Proven

When a massive amount of ancient pyramids and temples, all around the world (thus independently), are pointing to that same small areas to which Teotihuacan was oriented, we can calculate the probability of this event to occur.

Why is that? Because all these structures are independently oriented from each other, and therefore we can treat their orientation as an independent mathematical property.

How this proof is delivered is extensively explained in other articles, and it irrefutably proves that the geographical pole has changed its position, while there were already civilizations present on earth. Such an event wipes almost everything off the face of the earth. They are related to Great Floods. Note the plurality. Half a dozen civilizations were wiped away. Most evidence is gone or scrambled and jumbled, leaving one big mess behind. That explains a lot, isn’t it?

Science, and especially archaeology, climatology, and geology, has to deal with immense errors in its core. In fact can we regard these disciplines as irrational and still in its infancy. Mathematics as the Queen of Science towers above all scientific branches, and doesn’t care about the childish evidence of any of these disciplines.

Teotihuacan Was Oriented to a Former Geo North Pole

Fig. 6: Teotihuacan was once aligned to its “own” geographic North pole, Pole III, when this was at another location. This was more than 200,000 years ago, which is the TRUE age of Teotihuacan. The distance from Giza to the North pole = distance Teotihuacan to its former pole. That’s WHY they are closely related | © 2016 by Buildreps

Why Teotihuacan was Abandoned by its Builders

The most logical explanation is this: the ushering of a new ice age, which was in fact an earth crust shift, wiped away civilizations over and over again. It happened in the past, and it will happen in the future. The few people that remain after this catastrophe started to roam the planet looking for better places to settle.

Climatic zones start to change very slowly. The sunrise and sunset changes. The solstices start to change. The earth is in great turmoil with tidal waves, volcanoes, and mega-quakes. People had become low developed scavengers, warped back into their survival mode – the stone age.

Species Seemingly Appear Out of Nowhere

The image, or the controlling paradigm as you might call it, is that scientists perceive a species coming from virtually nowhere. This specie, Homo sapiens, starts to migrate to the North. It is literally running after the shifted pole to the North. It seems virtually that species arise from nothing, while they in fact originated from a high advanced race many thousands years before.

When you look at the other side of the continent, like Russia, the species started to run to the South. It explains the massive amount of frozen animals, like the mammoths in Siberia. The idea that they were flash frozen by a sudden event, like Hapgood suggested, is very weak, because the whole concept leans on a few, very hard to prove observations.

The fact is that everything archaeology has done in the last century has to be revalued. The information that has been poured over the people through the mainstream media is proven to be completely worthless.

How Orientation Clusters Relate to Ice Ages

Fig. 7: Teotihuacan was built between 210,000 and 225,000 years ago. The probability of this claim is higher than any other claim regarding the age of Teotihuacan. | © 2016 by Buildreps

The Five Massive Mathematical Clusters

Fig. 8: This animation shows how the crust has been displaced in 4 stages over the last 350,000 years. Teotihuacan belongs to Pole III. The red dot represents the geographic North pole, i.e. the rotation axis of the Earth. The red dots become larger the older a geographic pole is; this indicates the growing deformation of the crust. | © 2016 by Buildreps

How Old is Teotihuacan?

Teotihuacan is built between 210,000 and 225,000 years ago. The top structure might have been renovated by the many peoples who occupied the city over the many millenniums, but the foundation never changed its orientation.

This and much more will be published in the book “Atlantis is Here” that might, metaphorically speaking, shifts your paradigm in the same way as the earth crust did. Note that the next crustal shift isn’t expected the next 100,000 years. Forget the fear mongers and doomsday preachers that Earth will be destructed soon. We are still in the aftermath of the last catastrophe and will have a lot work on our hands to deal with that.

 

© 2016 by Buildreps

First published: March 12, 2016

Lost Civilizations and Earth Crust Shifts

Fig. 1: Life is fragile, and in the same time indestructible. Huge catastrophes swept away life on Earth many times. Gravity and motion are the main drivers of life on earth, but also the main cause of death and extinction.

The Theory of Earth Crust Displacements

After reading the title, you might ask “do we have earth crust displacements then?” The answer on this question will be given in this very comprehensive, and maybe from time to time tough article.

The theory of earth crust displacements has been dumped into the corners of pseudo science in the early 60s after Wegener’s theory of plate tectonics was confirmed by evidence found on the ocean floors.

Professor Charles Hapgood claimed that the earth’s crust, which is relatively thin and light (part of the lithosphere), could shift over the hot, molten magma layer (astenosphere) on which it is believed to be floating. It was later said by scientists that there is no force strong enough to make such radical movements of the crust possible, and that only the very slow tectonic plate movements forms the earth’s crust, and thus the climatic events.

There is indeed no force strong enough to make very swift radical movements possible like Hapgood suggest, but he was ultimately true that Earth crust displacements are possible.

Fig. 2: Solar heat at high latitudes is reduced in two ways: light travels a longer path through the atmosphere AND the incoming light is spread over a larger surface.

The Ruling Theories Result in Too Many Contradictions

At first hand seems the current ruling scientific view viable for most of the phenomena we witness on earth. The geological record provides irrefutable evidence that dramatic climate fluctuations have occurred throughout our planet’s history.

 

Charles Hapgood delivered a lifetime achievement with his book Earth’s Shifting Crust – A Key to Some Basic Problems of Earth Science. His book is interesting to read, written in simple language.

Geological evidence suggests that the climate had very mild periods, virtually from pole to pole. But how is that even possible when the sun is considered to be the only heat source? How can the sun heat the poles? This idea seems to be only possible when the earth would be heated from within, through convection.

Hapgood’s conclusions show enough reasons to do profound research on this issue, to find the truth.

Fig. 3: The eccentricity of the last ice age, more than a thousand miles off, is shouting for a rational explanation, while most scientists still believe that carbon dioxide causes global warming. | © 2016 by Buildreps

Radical Changes Require Radical Forces or Vice Versa

While reading Hapgood’s book, you become convinced that Earth crust displacements are the only credible explanation for many phenomena like:

  1. the sudden waxing and waning of glaciations,
  2. the eccentricity of recent ice caps in relation to the geo poles,
  3. that Greenland was about 450,000 years ago really green, and covered in rich flora,
  4. the sudden extinction of flora and fauna,
  5. the sudden emergence of new species.

Hapgood’s treatise is much more detailed and profound then just the few actualities shown here. His style of research was original, intelligent, and very controversial. You can also call it out-of-the-mainstream ideas.

Fig. 4: Ice depositions grow usually centric around the pole, unless a phenomena like the Warm Gulfstream makes it acentric like you can see on the North pole in March. | © 2016 by Buildreps

Why the Eccentric Ice Caps Requires an Explanation

When we look at the North pole in March, we see that the Gulf Stream warms the whole region denoted by N3, and partially N2 and N4. The Gulf Stream is very powerful.

What would happen when there wasn’t a Gulf Stream present?

The ice formation around the North pole would then become almost symmetric, and the Greenland Sea and Northern Atlantic would be completely frozen in Winter.

One could try to argue that during the last ice age there must have been a warm Gulf stream along the coasts of Alaska and Eastern Russia, pushing itself through the Bering Strait, making this ice formation around the pole acentric. But the seaway between Alaska and Russia is far to narrow for a Gulf Stream to pass through and become large enough to cause such a large asymmetry. This seaway was not even present during the last glaciation cycle due to the low sea level – there was a land bridge between North America and Russia.

It is crucial to understand that energy always flows from high to low, and not vice versa. The Warm Gulf stream is running in that region because it is a consequence of the second Law of Thermodynamics – restoring an energetic imbalance after a crustal dislocation. This process is still running today – the melting of Greenland.

The Warm Gulfstream will decrease in intensity after the situation at the North pole is returned to normal, and that is after the Greenland ice sheet is almost completely molten, which will still take some 4,000 years.

Fig. 5: The amount of incoming solar energy at the poles depends strongly on latitude AND season.

Why Science is Not Always Rational

One of the most serious dilemmas in Palaeontology is that Antarctica once had abundant subtropical flora and fauna, some 50 million years ago.

Science also tells us that Antarctica would be at its current location at that time. This leads us to the question: where was the solar light coming from to make this abundant, subtropical lifeforms possible? Mirrors in space maybe?

No, scientists came up with an even more ludicrous theory.

During six months there is hardly any solar light on Antarctica. The Milankovitch cycles are much too weak to explain anything regarding this issue (making the South pole lightly turn to the sun).

Scientists came up with the idea how trees and plants must have adapted to an almost complete lack of sun light. How does that work without photosynthesis?

Why don’t we see this adaptation happening today? Why do we still have taigas, tundras, and steppes and no tropical rain forests in Northern Siberia or Alaska? Or why don’t we see any trees growing on top of the Himalayas?

What we see happening here is that if one possibility is moved from the scene – crustal dislocations – they are replaced by the only left possibility – plants growing without solar light. These are irrational, unreliable, and adhoc theories. The tragic is that the general public believes these fantasies as to be true, which are broadcasted by the mainstream media, inflated with beautiful animations, like fairytales for adults.

There is no other way to explain these facts than with crustal dislocations.

 

Fig. 6: The Pangaea Theory.

More About the Pangaea Theory

The Pangaea theory was devised to explain how species migrated between the different continents.

Alfred Wegener, who was the (official) founder of the idea, saw that continents once could have fitted into eachother, like you can see on the photo on the right. It is believed to be 250 million years ago.

It is thought to be a cyclical event. Meaning, there could have been more “Pangaeas” before this one.

It is a simple, visually based theory that comes at hand, for the palaeontologists, to explain many things, like in this case the migration of species. Geologists later confirmed the theory after finding fault lines on ocean floors, driven apart by forces from within earth.

Why the Pangaea Theory is Incomplete

The theory tells us that Pangaea started to break apart, but not why and how it broke apart. A theory that lacks to explain why or how it happened is incomplete.

The theory can also be used at will. For example, it explains how different species could spread over the continents. But it can also explain why we find similar dolmens or pyramids on every continent, or name any other similar cultural phenomenon. Why is that? Because humans could spread all over the world and built their stone structures when Pangaea was still intact?

But because Pangaea was 250 million years ago, it is then dismissed as impossible. Which is using a theory according to whether it suits the inventors. This shows an inherent falsity at the core of science, which might be caused by the compartmentalization of science. Spreading of species is explained, while spreading of cultural similarities is instantaneously dismissed.

When the spreading of dolmens and pyramids all over the world is regarded as coincidence, why can’t we then regard spreading of species around the world as coincidence?

Continental drift is a fact, but Pangaea is an idea that cannot be verified by evidence or by any mathematical model. It is an immature visually based idea.

The Framework for Any Glaciation Theory

Hapgood mentions in his book, William Lee Stokes, a well known geologist and palaeontologist, who provided a framework that every theory has to meet when it wants to explain glaciations. A theory that neglects one or more items on this list can be regarded as unviable or incomplete.

  1. An initiating event or condition.
  2. A mechanism for cyclic repetitions or oscillations within the general period of glaciation.
  3. A terminating condition or event.
  4. It should not rely upon unprovable, unobservable, or unpredictable conditions when well-known or more simple ones will suffice.
  5. It must solve the problem of increased precipitation with colder climate.
  6. The facts call for a mechanism that either increases the precipitation or lowers the temperature very gradually over a period of thousands of years.

Hapgood believed that the theory of ice deposition at the poles could make the crust shift. Maybe it can play part in an increasing imbalance of the crust, but it cannot be the main cause of crustal dislocations. Why not?

Fig. 7: Hammer throwing is a good example where eccentric forces are used to move an object from A to B.

Why Ice Deposition at the Poles Cannot Cause Large Crustal Dislocations

Asymmetrical ice depositions around the poles cause theoretically very large tangential pointed forces.

Since earth is a sphere, these eccentric forces can theoretically, when they occur around the poles, and are large enough, shift the crust (lithosphere) over the syrupy magma layer (asthenosphere).

Hapgood believed that the last ice ages at the Northern hemisphere caused the earth crust to shift. This idea was also formed after looking at the growing eccentricity on Antarctica.

But Hapgood’s theory is deeply conflicting in itself, and contains a circular reasoning:

A) If we look at the Northern ice sheet during the last ice age, with the idea that the geo pole was where it currently is, we see a very large eccentricity (see fig. 3). This eccentricity could be, according to Hapgood, responsible for a crustal shift. Because ice forms centric around the poles, how can it be responsible for imbalances?

B) How could this pole move from Greenland to its current location? Because we cannot seem to solve this large eccentricity other then positing the thesis that the pole was on Greenland a priori, we then automatically balance the ice sheet around the pole, making any eccentric forces impossible.

C) How could it then cause a crustal shift? Because the eccentric forces were neutralizing each other when the pole was on Greenland.

D) How can it be that Antarctica was moving to the geo pole? It was then making a counter movement, and thus proving that the contrary was happening.

You see here that the reasoning conflicts, hence dismissing the possibility that the ice sheets itself cause crustal displacements.

Milankovitch Cycles – A More Consistent Clue

Without any doubt was Hapgood right about radical, violent crustal dislocations. But his theory was incomplete, and moreover, it simply ignored many contemporary, clearly proven theories.

Milankovitch, for example, discovered already in the 1920s that the orbital cycles – eccentricity, obliquity, and precession – seemed to be in accordance with glacial cycles.

This lead to a typical ‘short circuit’ theory that the Milankovitch cycles in itself were responsible for the ice ages, although science still very poorly understands why Milankovitch’s cycles influence the climate on earth.

A Large ‘e’ Stands For Large Annual Gravitational Swings

Fig. 8: The larger the eccentricity becomes, the larger the annual gravitational changes become. These fluctuations cause very large tidal oscillation, and causes crustal deformations which we call “ice ages”. | © 2016 by Buildreps

Why Eccentricity is the Main Key to Understand Glaciations

The only factor in the Milankovitch cycles that seems to influence the amount of received solar energy is the changing eccentricity of earth’s orbit.

A sphere, which the earth is, doesn’t receive less energy when it is tilted or when it wobbles in any way. It still receives the same amount of solar energy. Eccentricity seems then to be the only key left to explain glaciations.

And even this phenomenon, when regarded over a period of one year doesn’t show changing incoming solar energy. Why not? Because the average distance to the sun doesn’t change over one year. The Aphelion a(1+e) and the Perihelion a(1-e) always result in 2 × a, meaning that the net result of collected solar energy over one years stays the same. And since glaciations cover periods of tens of thousands of years, there’s no way to explain how the amount of incoming solar energy ever can change.

We can easily see there’s a huge dilemma here, because the curve fittings of the Milankovitch cycles and glaciation cycles show a perfect match.

Temperature Proxies (δ18O) and Eccentricity

Fig. 9: D18O records found on the ocean floors are a very good proxies for temperature indicators of the past. The similarities between D18O and eccentric orbit is crystal clear. C=cold, W =warm. | © 2016 by Buildreps

What is the Relation Between δ18O and Eccentricity?

The δ18O samples (Foraminifera shells) taken from the ocean floor serve as very good temperature indicators. It is not difficult to overlook the similarity of patterns between the two curves. The curves have to be well superimposed to make the similarities clear.

We see that the highs of the red curve correspond to the lows of the black curve. δ18O is somewhat tricky. Low values stand for high temperatures and vice versa. The explanation behind this mechanism can be explained as: If the eccentricity of earth’s orbit around the sun runs above a certain value, the temperature proxies start to drop radically (temperature goes up).

But why? Since the annual solar energy doesn’t change?

What Paleontologists measured was not the real temperature, but the proxy of that temperature. When the proxies (the shells) were moved from one region (latitude) to another, this is not visible, and could easily be misinterpreted as a temperature change. While in fact the sample were displaced to another climatic zone.

The crust was heavily deformed as a response to the increasing tidal forces which was the effect of a large eccentric orbit. The proxies reacted on that crustal shift. A change in latitude means a change in temperature.

Mind you that this possibility has been ignored by both geologists and paleontologists, which is a tragic error.

Another Proxy – δD and Eccentricity

Fig. 10: The relations between eccentricity in earth’s orbit and glaciations are clear. Eccentric relates to glaciation cycles. Glaciation cycles are caused by tidal oscillation, deforming the Earth’s crust.| © 2016 by Buildreps

Another Proxy

Another proxy from the ice cores of Dome-C on Antarctica shows the same kind of pattern, although this proxy works different, it also relates to temperature change.

We see that the highs of the red curve correspond to the highs of the blue curve.

It is clear, and not very difficult to verify, that the eccentricity of earth’s orbit triggers an event that is interpreted by scientist as a glaciation, while it was a crustal shift.

It is not unthinkable though that a large eccentric orbit ‘massages’ earth’s interior more strongly, so that the earth starts to warm up from the inside. Convection from the inside might warm the crust a little. It can also make the syrupy astenosphere more fluid, which might cause the crust to ‘moonwalk’ over the magma, under influence of a large tidal oscillation. One thing is sure – science really has to get to work, and stop this silly whining over carbon induced warming.

The smaller temperature changes in between the large peaks can be easily explained by many less impactive events like varying solar activity, Heinrich events, changes in ocean circulation, etcetera.

Additional Effects – Annual Extreme Weathering

Fig. 11: Because the earth axis is tilted a large eccentricity has profound effects on temperature changes. | © 2016 by Buildreps

Why These Extremes Cause Crustal Shifts

When the eccentricity of earth’s orbit increases, it doesn’t influence the annual amount of received solar energy, but it does influence gravitation between the earth and the sun significantly.

  1. The larger the eccentricity becomes, the larger the temperature differences over one year. To understand the effects, look at deserts – hot at daylight, cold at night, resulting in erosive, rock splitting conditions.
  2. Depending of the tilt and precession during an extreme eccentricity, some parts of the globe are subjected to more extremes than other parts. Resulting in local expansion (heating) and local contraction (cooling).
  3. The closer earth gets to the sun, the harder the sun is pulling. This causes extreme tidal oscillations.

This latter effect is the main driver behind crustal deformations. Once the tidal forces are large enough, the lithosphere is able to break loose from its syrupy under layer, and starts to dislocate.

This phenomenon might also trigger dislocations of the outer (liquid metal) core, a phenomenon that we currently witness as a wandering magnetic pole.

How Earth’s Rotation Currently Varies

Fig. 12: The annual variation in rotation speed is the result of the current eccentricity of earth’s orbit around the sun. It is 2 milliseconds per year.

Current Fluctuations of Earth’s Rotation

The graph above shows how annually the earth’s rotation varies just a little bit. This variation is induced by the changing distance to the sun, which is also determined by the collective momentum of our entire solar system. When the earth gets somewhat closer to the sun, the rotation slows down with about 2 milliseconds. When it moves further away, the rotation speed goes up again.

The overall loss in speed, visible in the graph by the overall downward trend, is energy which is transferred to the moon. The result is that the moon slowly moves away from the earth, while increasing its rotational speed.

This coherent system is mathematically amazing complex, and still very poorly understood by science.

The variation in annual rotation speed seems very tiny, but it represents an amazing amount of energy: 9.93·1021 Joule [1]. The total global energy consumption in 2015 is estimated to be about 6.5·1020 Joule. This unnoticeable small fraction in Earth’s rotational variations is about 15 times more powerful than the total global energy consumption.

Sometimes you have to see things in their true perspectives.

[1]: Erot = ½·I·(ω12– ω22); I = 8.04×1037kg·m2; ω1 = 7.2934778604×10-5 rad/s; ω2 = 7.2934780297×10-5 rad/s

Earth’s Inner is a Composition of Layers

Fig. 13: Earth’s solid inner layers are hydraulic connected by two liquid layers. The solid parts can move separately from each other when the tidal forces become large enough. | © 2016 by Buildreps
Fig. 14: The Earth’s layered structure: 1=inner core (solid); 2=outer core (liquid); 3=lower mantle (solid); 4=upper mantle (syrupy); 5=lithosphere (solid); 6=crust (solid, part of the lithosphere)

Rotation Speed of the Earth Varies

Once you understand that the rotation speed of the earth partially depends on the distance to the sun, it is not difficult to see that this influences the force on the different shells of earth’s inner.

Many people regard the earth as one solid object, while it consists of three solid shells that are rotational connected to eachother by two liquid intermediate layers.

All three solid components will react differently to increasing tidal oscillation.

Why?

Because their densities are very different. The inner core is very heavy, while the crust is very light. This results in different reactions to an eccentric orbit.

Eccentricity and glaciations are clearly one and the same.

The Ultimate Cause of Crustal Shifts

When the tidal oscillations exceeds a certain threshold, one or more of the solid layers can lose its connections with one of the liquid layers. This happens when one of the liquid layers is not able to transfer the momentum between one of the solid layers.

And this oscillation forcecauses the earth’s crust to shift and deform.

As with a spinning top, when a force is exercised in one direction, it will react perpendicular to that force. This is why we see that the crust has shifted mainly in latitudinal direction, and not in longitudinal direction.

The most inner core is solid and very heavy, it won’t react as fiercely to tidal oscillations as the very light and brittle outer shell, the crust. The crust is connected to a tough syrupy asthaenosphere that won’t loose its grip that easy.

 

 

© 2016-2018 by Buildreps

First published: March 2, 2016

Orientation of Pyramids to Former North Poles

Orientation of Ancient Structures to Current Geographic North Pole

Fig. 1: There are many ancient temples and pyramids oriented to the current North pole. Of the 538 selected structures 70 of them are exactly oriented to the current North pole. How coincidental is that? | © 2016 by Buildreps
Fig. 2: Tiwanaku (Kalasasaya) is oriented to the current North pole under an angle of ±0.2° degrees. There’s much debate about Tiwanaku and who built it.

Why Are Temples and Pyramids Cardinally Oriented?

There are many ancient structures, like pyramids and temples, around the world positioned in such a way that their footprint points precisely to the current North pole.

The majority of the temples and pyramids were built in the middle of nowhere.

Now what would you do when you’ve all the space to position a pyramid? Unless you’ve no idea what you’re doing, there’s only one logical answer to that question is: you would orient it to the geographical poles.

When you want to study and predict solar cycles, moon cycles, solar eclipses, equinoxes, earth’s motions (obliquity, precession, eccentricity of orbit), or any other phenomenon in the sky, you must point your instrument to the only sure point – the rotation axis of the earth. Which is the geographical North pole. If you don’t do that you will introduce another variable into the equations, which makes them much harder to solve.

But besides this, it also appeared that many other structures of importance are oriented to the geographical North pole without a clear reason. Pure symmetry between sunrise and sunset might have been one of the reasons. We simply love the sun for many different reasons.

This article is probably difficult for many readers. When you’re able to work your way through it, you might become aware how wrong our history is taught to us.

Earth crust shifts are real, and pyramids are much, much older. By using mathematics our real history reveals itself razor sharp.

Fig. 3: The largest cathedrals in the world are without exception cardinally or almost cardinally oriented. | © 2016 Mario Buildreps

How Mathematics Proves Our History is Wrongly Interpreted

What does it mean when the majority of the pyramids and temples are not oriented to the current North pole? How likely is it then that they were oriented to former North poles? This can be sorted out by using the power of mathematics.

In this series of articles we will prove that the former (geographic) North pole was on Greenland. The structures that are oriented to this former pole are therefore older than assumed by archaeologists.

Why?

Because these pyramids from all over the world were collectively oriented to another geographic pole. And that was a very long time ago. We are here not talking about some few thousand years. No, we are talking about hundreds of thousands of years. The foundations of most pyramids are way older than 100,000 years. The top layers might have been renovated many times – the orientation was left intact.

The claim is extraordinary, the proof is extraordinary as well. The mathematics behind the proof is extremely powerful, and will be published in a book that is currently in the making under the title “Atlantis is Here”. The title points to the fact that we are living in Atlantis right now. It’s everywhere around us, but we fail to see it. Our consciousness is dramatically failing.

How Two Separate Bearings Can Intersect With Each Other

Fig. 4: Two boats sailing a steady course will intersect at a certain point. We can calculate this intersection point. When many sailing boats are intersecting at the same spot, would that be coincidence or artificially? The same principle counts for pyramid alignments. | © 2016 by Buildreps

Believe is Strong

Believe is strong. We believe that the history as it is taught to us is correct. Even when mathematics proves it is wrong, we tend to keep believing that the history as it is pounded in our brains is correct.

This is what we call conditioning. A conditioned mind has troubles to interpret outcomes of mathematics that deviates from the programmed believes. No matter how solid the proof is, we tend to fall back into our old believe of the trusty old thing. To get used to another idea takes time. Much time.

How Two Cardinally Oriented Pyramids Intersect at the Geo Pole

Fig. 5: When two pyramids are pointing North, we can be sure they belong to the same time frame. We now know that this time frame is our current crustal position. | © 2016 by Buildreps
Fig. 6: Borobudur is probably one of the most accurate oriented temples in the world under an angle ±0.1° to the current North pole.

Temples and Pyramids Exactly Oriented to the Current North Pole

  • Lintong +12 other structures in China (pink line)
  • Borobudur on Central Java (dark blue line)
  • Angkor Wat +12 other structures in Cambodia (yellow line)
  • Konark Sun Temple in India (orange line)
  • Sri Rangam temple +1 other structure in India (red line)
  • Harappa in Pakistan (green line)
  • Bar’am +2 other structures in Israel (white line)
  • Pyramids of Giza and Temple of Horus in Egypt (green line)
  • Tiwanaku in Bolivia (purple line)
  • Naranjo in Quatemala +3 other structures in Mexico (light blue line)
  • Conimbriga (Portugal) and Lumbini (Nepal)
  • Three pyramids in Mexico, Mayapan and Ek’ Balam
  • 24 other structures around the world

Total: 70

The question is: What is the probability that 70 of the randomly selected global 538 (ancient) structures are coincidentally oriented to the current geographic pole (within a range of 3 degrees)? To be precise it is 1 to 1.79×1021, which is an incredible small chance.

What does that actually mean? It means that the orientation of a large amount of structures to the geographic North pole is NOT coincidental, hence it was done on purpose. The reason? Why is the White House perfectly cardinally oriented? Or why is the Taj Mahal perfectly cardinally oriented? Or why is the Vatican cardinally oriented? Or why are most observatories cardinally oriented? If you have found out that reason you will start to understand more. That is your homework for this week. 🙂

Thus the orientation of these 70 temples and pyramids was done on purpose, and thus can we say with 100% certainty that the geographic pole is where it is based upon the orientation of these pyramids and temples. It is crucial to grasp this part. We can extend the same methodology to other ancient structures which are not cardinally oriented, and examine how they relate to each other. We appear to be able to distill former geographic poles from the orientation patterns. The powerful mathematics delivers 100% proof of former geographic poles.

Fig. 7: Angkor Wat is oriented within 0.2 degrees to the current North pole.

Don’t Pick Just Some Buildings

When you want to prove a theory of this magnitude, it makes no sense to pick just some structures. No, the structures you must pick must be monumental, big, ancient, and perhaps religious of nature. Don’t pick just some random buildings, like the Notre Dame in Paris or some other cathedral somewhere.

But did you know that the Vatican is almost perfectly East-West oriented, and therefore oriented to the current geographic poles? Whatever the reason was, it seemed important enough to orient it this way in the middle of a crowded metropolis. The Vatican isn’t on the list however. It’s much too young.

Picking just some church in the middle of a town, proves nothing. The location of the sun and stars didn’t matter for them, let alone the North pole. The church had to be fitted in the spatial possibilities of the city at that time.

The criteria of the ancient sites:

  • undoubtedly ancient
  • square or rectangular,
  • the larger the better (= of more importance),
  • preferably isolated (= not influenced in orientation),
  • orientation is measurable.

Seemingly Criss-Cross Oriented

During the research there were 4 other orientation clusters found. An orientation cluster is an indication of a possible former geographic pole. But to be more sure about that conclusion much more research was done to verify this. You can read the other articles on this website to get a full picture of the method.

Pyramids from all over the world are oriented to just a few locations that forms clusters on a so called NORTH-SOUTH reference line. This line is explained further on.

Some sites in Mexico comprise a large collection of pyramids that are criss-cross oriented as if they were just dumped down there. But the chance that a few structures on one site cross other alignment cluster(s) is very, very small. It’s almost zero. But if that occurs, it means it was not accidental. The ancient site was reoriented to another pole.

These sites can be interpreted as sites that were rebuilt after a catastrophe – a crustal shift. These structures can tell us an interesting story what might have happened in the past.

Fig. 8: Measuring the orientation of a pyramid is never 100% accurate. You have to deal with a certain error. | © 2016 by Buildreps

The Accuracy of Measurement

We know where the current geographical North pole is. We can measure in Google Earth the angle under which structures were constructed in relation to the geo pole. Thus we can verify the accuracy of our measurements.

The first thing you need to know is how accurately a structure can be measured in Google Earth.

Take for example the Great pyramid of Giza. We know it is perfectly aligned to the geo pole (within ±0.05°). So, we can verify our framework on this.

Experimental measurements on different parts of Giza showed that the average accuracy of measurement of Giza in Google Earth resulted in an error of ±0.20°. The pyramids of Giza are relatively easy to measure; the satellite footage is sharp and the basis of the pyramids are relatively clear.

Choosing the Error of Measurement

There are structures which are harder to measure accurately, because the satellite footage is blurry, or the angle under which the objects were photographed was not vertically (the baseline is the most safe area to measure).

For some of these sites archaeological maps with a North arrow indicator were used as a cross reference to verify the outcomes of the measurement in Google Earth.

Experiments with measurements in Google Earth compared to maps of ancient sites showed a standard deviation of:

  • σ=68.2%: ±0.5°
  • 2σ=95.4%: ±1.1°
  • 3σ=99.7%: ±1.5°

3σ (99.7%) was accepted as reliable enough for the calculations: ±1.5°. This also includes the error of measurement and glitches in the footage. Although Giza could be measured much more exact, only ±1.5° (total angle is 1.5+1.5=3.0°) was accepted as the standard accuracy for the whole project, and that counted for Giza as well.

Fig. 9: Accumulation of errors can result in disasters.

Accumulation of Errors

When we intend to find former geographical poles, we have to be aware of the possible accumulation of errors, like:

  1. When the pyramid builders established the geo pole many thousands years ago, they made a little error in their measurements. Even with our GPS systems today we have to deal with a potential error of about ± 15 meters.
  2. When the pyramid builders constructed their pyramids, they again made a small error between their perception of true North and the actual orientation of the stones.
  3. When we measure the pyramid many thousands years later, the position of the pyramid might have changed a little bit, due to geological processes, especially when earth crust displacements appear to be real.
  4. When we measure the pyramid many thousands years later, we again make small errors in our measurements.

It is possible that all these errors cancel each other out and nicely result in some perfection, but it is most likely that we’ll find an erratic pattern of ‘noise’. This noise is the build-up of the above mentioned errors, and is ultimately the root of the sum of squares: the combined error Δn =  (√(x12+x22+x32+x42 …+…xn2).

Cardinal Versus Non-cardinal Orientations

Fig. 10: When you measure ancient objects spread from all over the world, you will find a stunning result: mathematical proof that the earth crust has shifted on the rhythm of the Milankovitch cycles. | © 2016 by Buildreps

Probability That Giza Was Meant to Point North

The chance that one of the pyramids of Giza is coincidentally cardinally oriented is 1 to 30 (90÷3.0).

The chance that all three of them are coincidental oriented to the North pole is almost ZERO. To be exact: 0,0037% ((3.0/90)3 × 100%). So, Giza altogether was no coincidence.

The claim that all three were meant to be oriented to the current geographic pole is 99.9963% sure.

Fig. 12: When alignments are measured under a large angle, the error will remain small. | © 2016 by Buildreps
Fig. 11: Measuring objects that are alignment under a small angle result in a larger error. | © 2016 by Buildreps

How to Define the Chances on Intentional Orientation

How to Define the Chances on Intentional Orientations

Most pyramids have four sides. Since we don’t know for sure the purpose of a pyramid we cannot discriminate one side over another. So, the angle in which it can be uniquely arranged is 90° (360°÷4). We cannot tell which orientation in regard to the geographic pole has a higher priority, so we can only define a structure 45 degrees left of the geo pole and 45 degrees right of the geo pole. This is the mathematical unambiguous basis for the method.

With the average accuracy of ±1.5° in which we could measure the structures, there are within the angle of 90° 30 discriminating steps, which makes a standard chance of 3.33% in the defined framework that a pyramid is accidentally pointing to the North pole.

There are currently 538 measured structures in the database. Hence there’s a standard chance that 18 of the structures (538×3.33%) are pointing to the North. So, when we find 18 structures clustering within an area of 3 degrees along the intersection line we cannot derive a special status from that. But when this amount of random clustering exceeds for example 30 or even 40, the probability that it is coincidence dives rapidly towards ZERO. We can distill from these combinatorial patterns the ultimate proof that the crust, ultimately the North pole, has shifted and that pyramids are much older.

Why much older? Because such a devastating and catastrophic event wouldn’t have happened completely unnoticed over the last millenniums.

Of the randomly selected structures, there were 70 ancient structures in the database pointing to the current geographical North pole. Like already shown above the chance on mere luck is ZERO.

When another cluster of this magnitude shows up it is surely one of the former North poles, with a certainty of almost 100%. Let’s have a look.

Fig. 13: How large is the chance that 43% of all the alignments are running over Greenland, which is just 24% of a quarter hemisphere? When we’re trying to find another pole, is Greenland our best bet. | © 2016 by Buildreps

Finding the Other Poles

You can find former geo poles by following the orientation patterns of ancient structures, and calculate the probability that it actually is a former geo pole location. Just follow the patterns of pyramid orientations which are not pointing to the current geo poles.

But since we only know the current geo poles for sure, and we are not sure where to look, it is best to go from coarse to fine. If there are hints that the former geographic North pole might have been on Greenland, the first thing that could be done is looking for the amount of orientations that intersect Greenland as a whole.

The amount of (pyramidal orientations) intersections on Greenland is 230 of the total of 538. The probability for such large amount of data to cluster in such a way is insanely small: 1 to 4.95×10210[2]. We can be very sure that the former geo North pole(s) was somewhere on Greenland. Or better, Greenland was once situated on the geographical North pole. We can claim this with 100% certainty, even if we don’t know anything about geology, archaeology, or some other study. We only need mathematics to find out what is true and what is false.

We don’t know yet where to look on Greenland, but that can be done by following a simple logic. How? By connecting the pyramids by using an ‘independent intermediator’ – the intersection line. This line represents the rough path the pole took over the last 400,000 years.

[2]: n=538; x=230; p=0.24; q=0.76

Creating an Intersection Line Over Greenland

Fig. 14: When we draw a vertical line towards the South pole at a longitude of 45 degrees, which is over the middle of Greenland, we can examine how many ancient alignments intersect that line. The peaks in the graph show the most likely locations of the former poles. | © 2016 by Buildreps

Why Not Connecting Pyramids Directly

It happens often, especially on the internet, that people claim to have found a connection between ancient objects by drawing some lines between them. In most cases that means absolutely nothing, and we cannot draw any conclusions from it.

With 538 pyramids we can have (538-1)2 possible connections. That are 288,369 intersection points. It would be an immense unreadable scatter plot with over 90% of useless noise in it. What conclusions could we draw from that? And why wouldn’t we organize the research logically at first hand?

We can find an intersection point between two of the most enigmatic pyramids on the planet, Teotihuacan and Giza. They intersect near Kongsfjord that lies in Northern Norway. We won’t find anything useful at that location. Maybe even more important, we don’t know why these pyramids and temples were “uncardinally” oriented in the first place.

The intersection line will lead us to groups of pyramids that we can safely connect to eachother, which leads us to a definitive location of a former pole. These pyramids all belong to the same time frame.

Former Pole Locations

Fig. 15: The analysis of the full dataset delivered spectacular results. The percentages are almost 100% and on top of that correspond the latitudes vs temperatures eerie precise with the last glaciation cycles.

 

How Probability is Determined

On the reference line we found, for example, 52 intersections between latitude 71 and 73. The standard probability is 18 intersections. We can calculate the likelihood that such a large cluster can be formed coincidentally by using the binomial formula.

  • n = number of trials = 538
  • p = probability of success = 0.03333 (3 degrees out of 90 degrees)
  • x = number of successes = 52

P(x) = 1.05×10-11

The probability that a cluster of this magnitude is formed coincidentally is 1 to 95.1 billion. Conversely we can say it is artificially constructed. Why? Because the probability it was intentional is ≈ 100%. All these random distributed ancient structures were clearly pointing to one location, and therefore a former geographic North pole, because the geographic pole is the only transcending geographical feature wherever you are on the globe.

The same situation was emulated by using Monte Carlo simulations, which gave the same results. We can be sure this method expresses this situation correctly.

Intersection Clusters = Proximity of Former Geo North Poles

Latitude  
Intersections with 47.1W Lon line  
Probability Former Geo pole  
76.1°N
62
100%
72.3°N
52 100%
64.0°N
64
99.9999993%
52.1°N
52
99.99554%

Mathematical Clustering Over Greenland

Fig. 16: The clustering over Greenland is formed by 11,000 intersection points and delivers instantaneous proof of an unbelievable reality: four former geographic poles. The distances between the nodes correspond very intimately with the temperature changes of the last series of ice ages, revealing the time frame of these poles.

Intersection Clusters on Greenland

Another thing that becomes clear when we look deeper into this issue; the older the cluster, the larger the area over which a dynamic group is formed. It might sound difficult, but it is easier than it seems. The older the geo pole is where the pyramids were once oriented to, the more deformations the crust had to endure. Plates were apparently deformed and thus also the accuracy of the oriented groups of related pyramids; they form a group over a larger area.

This mechanism shows itself in a larger spread of the oriented pyramid to this ancient geo pole. From this we are able to roughly recalculate the amount of deformation of the tectonic plates due to the crustal shifts.

Greenland went in a few steps over the North pole. It is possible to correlate the magnitude of the steps with the temperature proxies, δD or δ18O, respectively found in ice cores of Vostok and Dome-C (Antarctica). The similarities are clear. From this we can directly derive the time frames of the crustal shifts which are clearly related to the Milankovitch cycles.

The article on the main page tells the full essence of the theory.

 

© 2016, 2017 by Buildreps

First published: February 21, 2016