New research proves that most pyramids, temples, and other important ancient structures around the world were built before catastrophic earth crust shifts. The orientation of many pyramids reveals former geographic poles. Their foundations appear to be very ancient. The proof that the correlations are not at all coincidental has been mathematically provided by us. Most pyramids are much older than was always assumed, way beyond our imagination.
Note: To keep this website alive and to do our research we need your support. Thank you!
Commonly Used Dating Methods
Determining the age of a pyramid is not as simple as many people might assume. Most believe that archaeologists are correct in their conclusions. But stones cannot be dated to determine the age of a structure because what the researchers invariably find is the formation date of the rock material itself many millions of years ago. And not when the stones were used in the creation of a structure after rocks were formed.
Scientists believe they have found a reliable way to date stone structures when all they do is make associative, assumptive, and subjective connections between the organic materials found in and around the structures. They claim that this dating method is reliable, but there is no way for anyone to validate such a claim. We cannot associate one thing with another with absolute certainty.
And that appears to be the major problem in dating any stone structure: validation of the dating methods. There is not a single validation possible to back up any of the archaeologists’ claims. Academia, in general, is very sure about its dating methods, but our new mathematical dating method suggests that all dating of ancient structures, performed during the past several decades, is incorrect.
Academia states that the most common way to date a structure is to carbon-date organic artifacts left by ‘builders’ found inside and around pyramids, or organic materials that slipped between the stones. This method of dating is believed to be fairly accurate. It is often claimed as ‘evidence’ regarding the age of a given structure. That appears to be a major mistake.
What is Evidence?
According to the Oxford dictionaries, is evidence defined as the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid. The words ‘scientific evidence’ is often misused to emphasize a particular belief or to label a specific theory.
We believe that the sun and the moon are the cause of tides on earth. However, how do we know that for sure? The only evidence we have are clear patterns between the moon phases, orbits, and the tides. From that, we can develop a theory which predicts what will happen next. When we can verify it multiple times with our senses, we might become even more confident that the theory is complete and correct.
However, the final proof is the mathematical verdict that removes all doubts, whereas current scientific “evidence” only leads one in the direction of an alleged fact or a dubious statement. We have mathematically proven that the foundations of pyramids are hundreds of thousands of years old – we have real evidence. Our evidence is backed by indisputable proof that we express in probability.
The probability that we are correct in our hypothesis exceeds 99.7%. That is a very high figure to start research. After we deepened our research, we ended up with a figure of 99,99987% or 1 to 750,000 that we are wrong in our conclusions.
What Have We Discovered?
We have discovered that the orientation of virtually all ancient monuments, that are spread all over the world, form just a few giant orientation clusters around Greenland. The probability that these clusters are the result of a coincidental process is 0%. Orientation is the ultimate key to unlock many doors to the ancient secrets.
What the importance and meaning are of these typical orientation clusters is explained further on.
Classifying Ancient Monument according to Timeframes
If we can somehow relate pyramids around the world, can we then classify them into a certain period? Yes, it appears we can. And this is the first step to take before we dive into the intimidating mathematical details. We can do that by analyzing the orientation patterns of pyramids spread around the world.
We have researched the orientation of about 1,000 pyramids and temples around the world. This enormous research made it possible to classify the foundations of ancient structures within specified time frames. The biblical and mythical deluges and the Ice Ages appear to be the same time-related event, as you will see further on in this article. And it even happened more than once in history.
Some of our readers might have read Zacharia Sitchin’s translations of the Sumerian Tablets that also mention a series of deluges covering more than 400,000 years. That confirmation appears to be something more than coincidental. The time frames defined in these tablets seem to precisely correlate with the mathematical periods we have been able to extract from our data.
Deluges and Crustal Shifts Are One and the Same Event
Is there evidence of a Deluge? Yes, there is! We have overwhelming evidence for a Great Flood if we look at the effects the melting water of the great ice sheets had on the coastlines between 22,000 and 6,000 years ago. All coastlines flooded around the world because of this melting water. The majority of Humans have one thing in common; the general habit to live along coastal shores. And if the sea level rises massively, and keeps on rising through the centuries, this process disrupts their habitats constantly.
Around the globe, sea levels rose by about 120 meters. There are so many sunken cities all around the planet that it is easy to accept them as being older than 6,000 years. If such a deluge happened today, it would directly affect more than 60% of the Human population around the world.
Virtually all cultures speak about deluges in their myths and legends. Whatever scholars want to say about native legends, most ancient tales contain a deeply hidden truth. As we will show in this series of articles, the most probable cause of the floods were massive Earth crust deformations. Every deformation cycle marks the beginning of a new ice age.
We explain that, because pyramids have a square foundation, they can be used to find mathematical patterns in their orientation, especially when we examine them worldwide in large numbers.
Note – when we say: North pole, we mean the geographic North pole. Our theory of Earth Crust Deformations (also called ‘shifts’) does not deal with the magnetic poles. The geographical pole is the rotation axis of the earth.
Orientation of Giza
The statement that the pyramids of Giza are oriented to the current North pole (cardinally oriented) no longer makes the evening news. More important to know is that the Giza pyramids are oriented to the current geographic North pole and are therefore built after the Great Flood. This Great Flood was caused by an Earth Crust Shift, which ushered in the beginning of the last ice age.
Our estimation is that the Giza pyramids are built between 4,500 years and 26,000 years ago. That means that nothing which is precisely oriented to our current geographic pole is older than 26,000 years.
We have analyzed big data and concluded that the Earth’s crust became stable 26,000 years ago, after being unstable for more than 100,000 years. Our research has concluded that ice ages were nothing else than crustal deformations, but incorrectly interpreted as ice ages.
Our research is currently peer reviewed by a team of data analysts. After five years of non-stop research, we have little doubt what their conclusions will be.
Homo sapiens was not a brainless barbarian roaming around the planet for hundreds of thousands of years, just doing nothing, and then suddenly started to build marvelous structures. It appears that Homo sapiens has been actively building marvelous things over a period of hundreds of thousands of years. But don’t tell this to your history teacher. People who are stuck in dogmas and stories cannot digest such truths. They only get angry.
Chinese Pyramids that are NOT Oriented to Our current Geographic Pole
Pyramids at Xi’an, China
China has over 300 pyramids which are oriented in just a few groups. Most of the pyramids can be found in the center of China, near Xi’an.
These are real pyramids, and it took scientists many centuries to figure this out. They call them “tombs” because we are simply groping in the dark what they were used for. There are people who suggest they were used to focus energy, but that is all very obscure for anyone to verify.
The pyramids in China are profoundly oriented in just a few different configurations:
- Oriented to the current North pole;
- Oriented at an angle of about -8° (to Greenland);
- Oriented at an angle of about -14 to -15°.
Why are they oriented like this? The precision of the ones which are oriented to the current geographic pole is so exact that the other ones, which were oriented towards Greenland, suggest it was not something coincidental. But to prove this requires much more than just a few of these Chinese pyramids. That is why we collected as much data as we could possibly find.
The 8 degrees-oriented Chinese pyramids massively converge on the same area of Greenland as the pyramids of Latin America also do and collectively they form an enormous mathematical node. The odds for this node to be coincidental, which we have named Pole II, is 1 to 1.82×1020, which is incredibly high. Thus, Pole II is proven with 100% accuracy and certainty.
The Orientation of Chinese Pyramids
The different orientations of the Chinese pyramids imply that their ancient builder cultures had survived an Earth Crust Displacement. Crustal displacements moved the geographical North pole on Greenland to its current location. Greenland moved southward to an area where it starts to melt very slowly.
There are pyramids in China which were built before the Great Flood and others after the Great Flood. The builder cultures somehow survived it, adapted, and built another series of pyramids oriented to the new, current geographic pole.
This would mean that the pyramids oriented to the current North pole are of the same period as the ones of Giza, younger than 26,000 years. But the other pyramids, oriented with an angle of 8° are, by inference, older than 130,000 years. Yes, there is a huge gap between the stable periods of the geographic pole. The migration of a geographic pole took tens of thousands of years and wiped many advanced civilizations off the face of the Earth.
Is this why the Chinese culture is so advanced in medicine, religion, philosophy, and many other areas because it is so old and their traditions survived the Great Flood?
Locations of Some Chinese Pyramids
|Oriented to Current Pole (0°)||Oriented to Greenland (8°)|
|34°23’53″N / 108°42’44″E||34°21’48″N / 108°37’51″E|
|34°23’26″N / 108°44’21″E||34°21’43″N / 108°38’26″E|
|34°24’03″N / 108°45’53″E||34°20’18″N / 108°34’10″E|
Pyramids of Teotihuacan, Mexico
The whole perspective becomes even more interesting when we go to Mexico.
One of the most important aspects of scientific evidence is that it is reproducible and verifiable. In our case, it is gratifying that anyone can look over our shoulder and can confirm what we are doing. We talk in simple language.
When we draw a line from the pyramids in China (oriented at 8°) and the pyramids of Teotihuacan in Mexico, the lines will intersect each other on Greenland. This is reproducible and verifiable by anyone who has access to Google Earth. Academia should ask this question, as we did: What could this mean?
Read our article “Why is Greenland Covered in Ice?” again, and you will see clearly that the pyramids of Mexico and the ones of China were both constructed before the Great Flood. These pyramids were built when the North pole was still on Greenland – and that is a very long time ago.
The earth’s crust appears to have shifted, as Hapgood suggested, only it did this in a latitudinal manner. However, the crust did not shift as wildly as Hapgood suggested. It shifted slowly over a period of tens of thousands of years. The cultures that built these pyramids are much older than we ever imagined possible.
It is also importance to understand that Antarctica did not participate in this shifting process over the last half million years. The crust deformed disproportionate, which caused the geo North pole to migrate while the geo South pole remained at a fairly steady position.
How Teotihuacan and Pyramid Wu of Han Intersect at Greenland
Verification Data of Intersection Point
|China (Wu of Han)||34.338°N, 108.570°E||352° (360-8)|
|Mexico (Sun Pyramid)||19.692°N, 98.844°W||15.5°|
|Intersection Point||73.281°N, 44.246°W||–|
The More Intersections, the More Proof
Only a few intersections, as shown above, prove little. It could be just coincidental. To rule out any coincidence, we have collected, examined, and processed the data of more than 970 ancient structures and sites. The results are staggering. It turns upside down all our treasured conventional beliefs regarding our ancient past in relation to the Earth.
Since we already suspected that Greenland was once the location of a former North pole, we drew a line over Greenland from the current North pole to the current South pole, along a longitude of 45°W, and roughly calculated the number of intersections located on that preliminary reference line. The results were spectacular. Later in the process, the exact longitude of this line was calculated to be at 47.1°W. The results along this new line were even better.
Former geographic poles clearly revealed themselves at several locations on Greenland. The probability of this finding can be calculated by using the binomial formula. With the user data set, and with the preponderance of found intersections, the probability of mere chance is less than 0.000000001%. The existence of former geographic North poles has a certainty of better than 99.999999999%. Therefore, this finding is one of intent and not a coincidence.
In scientific terms: We can be sure this fact is true, and it has deep repercussions. As you will see, a puzzle starts to fall into place.
The Earth’s crust has shifted in the distant past when the civilizations who built these ancient pyramids, temples and other structures, were already present and were flourishing. We are not speaking of a few thousand years ago. We are speaking of a timeframe spanning hundreds of thousands of years.
The Earth’s Crust Has Shifted Multiple Times in the Past
We can safely claim that Greenland was repeatedly the location of previous North poles, without having any geological knowledge or evidence. We do not even have to go anywhere. We don’t need to walk on pyramids, or on glaciers, or to be a specialist in any of these areas. We do not even need a shred of ‘evidence’. We only need mathematics and a large database with the location and orientation of ancient structures.
We can now understand why Greenland is melting, and why we find so many mysterious sites around the world, and why these cultures disappeared.
In our book, which is currently in the making, we will disclose the details of how the location of this intersection line is calculated at precisely 47.091°W, rounded to 47.1°W.
The book will not intimidate anyone with mathematical equations forming the basis of our new theory. But there will be extensive appendices in the book, dedicated to the mathematics that supports our theory.
This is What We Found
© 2016 – by Mario Buildreps et al.
Proofreading and editing: J.B.