Why the Orientation of Pyramids Correlates to Ice Ages

The orientation of about 300 pyramids and temples randomly spread around the world correlates with the temperatures of the last glaciation cycles. Most pyramids are hundreds of thousands years old.

The correlation between the orientation of pyramids around the world and ice ages is so compelling that we can speak of mathematical proof. | © 2016 by Buildreps
 

Why Orientation is Crucial

The former article “How Old Are Pyramids Around the World?” showed some aspects of the orientation of pyramids and temples. Many astronomical, religious and even political buildings are up to this day cardinally oriented, meaning they are effectively oriented to the geographic poles. I recommend to read this article first before you proceed reading – it might open your eyes.

This article explores the phenomenon of orientation of pyramids and temples spread around the world further, and will show how orientation, which can be regarded as a pure mathematical quantification, strikingly correlates to the last four ice ages.

About 50% of the 300 ancient structures that were involved in this research are crossing four sections of together just 17° along the proposed intersection line. The mathematical implication of this is impressive, since the structures are randomly spread around the world. Mathematicians understand the consequences of this; the probability that this is coincidence is 1 to 95,000.

Did you ever ask yourself: “Why is Greenland Covered in Ice?. Scientists try to solve this question already for many decennials, without actually making any progress. It is an impossible task with the assumption that the Earth’s crust is fixed.

Orientation of Buildings

The pyramids of Giza are exactly cardinally oriented. Most of the pyramids and temples around the world are NOT cardinally oriented. What happens when we mass process these data? | © 2016 by Buildreps

No Need For Digging

This means that we are able to prove the age of pyramids by their orientation without digging into the ground or putting even one step on a pyramid. That’s the difference between materialistic sensory based science and mathematics.

Why are the most successful theories like Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity stuffed with mathematics, and why is history almost lacking any mathematics? Can we successfully explain our history with mathematics? Yes, we can. And we are even able to connect seemingly impossible things together to one big picture. That is what mathematics is good at – connecting the dots that our senses will never be able to connect.

How this is done? By mass processing the data we were able to prove in which time frame certain pyramids were built. The interconnectedness has profound consequences as you will see.

One decade of satellite footage did more than centuries of digging.

The Orientation of Two Pyramids

The intersection point of two pyramids that are facing North is on the (geo) North pole. They belong to the same time frame. | © 2016 by Buildreps

Why We Need an Intersection Line

Like shown in the former article we can connect the orientation of two different pyramids, and try to draw a conclusion from that. For example when we do that with the pyramids of Giza and with the Chinese pyramid Ping of Han in Xi’an, we can easily verify they intersect at our current North pole.

But can we do that with two pyramids which are oriented under an arbitrary angle? For example: can we do that with Teotihuacan and the Great Ziggurat of Ur? No we can’t, because there is no way to verify that we are connecting two different structures of the same time frame. When we want to mass process data we need an intersection line. This line is so to speak neutral. The line is a pure mathematical entity.

How on earth can we create such an imaginary line? That was one of the biggest efforts in the research, to find a scientific reliable way to determine such a line. The book “Atlantis is Here” explains more in detail how this line is created and what it represents and what it actually proves.

How the Intersection Line is Determined

The intersection line is determined by mass processing the orientation of Eastern and Western pyramids. We can now measure the intersection point of individual ancient buildings, and look what happens then. | © 2016 by Buildreps
 
Chichen Itza has been reoriented three times. Why is none of the buildings cardinally oriented? The claimed “solstice orientation” of El Castillo is completely incorrect, and based on pure assumptions. | © 2016 by Buildreps

Why Mexican Pyramids Are Very Old

There are hardly any pyramids to find in Mexico which are oriented to our current geo poles. The question that rises is: what does this mean? Could they be oriented to one of the solstices?

No chance, because in that case we wouldn’t find so many different orientations. Every latitude has only two solstice orientations, Summer and Winter, and we can calculate which of the pyramids possibly could be oriented to one of them. It were none.

Are most of the pyramids in Latin America pointing to a former pole on Greenland? The answer which is derived from a large amount of data is YES. It is a ‘yes’ with a probability of more than 99.99999%. And that is much more certain than any archaeologist, anthropologist or geologist was ever able to provide.

There was a former pole on Greenland, and many pyramids were oriented to that pole. There were even three geo poles before that, ranging back to 340,000 years ago.

It is the most unbelievable, and at the same time the most reliable answer there is to give on the question how old the pyramids around the world are.

The Raw Data – First Indications of Crustal Shifts

After processing the data roughly there appeared to be a clear pattern of so called “HotSpots”. The distances between the hot spots were not far away from the temperature swings during ice ages. | © 2016 by Buildreps
 

What is Very Old?

The interpretation of this whole new view on ancient times is that when the geographical pole shifts, it causes a new glaciation cycle.

The last glaciation started 110,000 years ago and ended about 12,000 years ago. Pyramids that are oriented to the former pole are thus older than 110,000 years, and younger than the glaciation prior to that, approximately 200,000 years.

This interpretation sheds a completely different light on our history and gives the required space to explain all the mysteries that scientists and scholars were never able to solve. Many scholars tend to avoid the issue of the many mysterious findings.

There are simply too many mysteries all around the place that scholars like to compress in less than 10,000 years, which is, to put it mildly, completely irrational.

Which mysteries you might think? You must juggle a long list of mysterious sites continuously in your head to remind yourself to the fact that none of the ancient mysteries really have been solved yet.

  • Why do we find hundreds of pyramids all around the planet?
  • Why do we find thousands of dolmens all around the planet?
  • What about Tiwanaku, Puma Punku, Sacsayhuaman, Teotihuacan, Göbekli Tepe? Thousands of them. Everywhere.
  • What about the Nazca lines?
  • What about Baalbek, Russia (Mount Shoria), Stonehenge, Carnac, Eastern Island, and Yonaguni?
  • What about the underground city of Derinkuyu in Turkey?

And that list is just one grain of sand in a whole mountain of sand. Keep that in mind.

A Strong Clue Why Ice Ages Could be Latitudinal Crustal Shifts

When the crust shifted in the latitudinal direction you will definitely find large temperature swings in the ice core data. When the data correlates it indicates that it was the crust that shifted. | Public Domain

The Mayan, Aztec, and Inca Cultures Are Very Old

The Mayan, Aztec, and Inca cultures are much older than mainstream science always told us. Why were these cultures suddenly gone? Science has never found a credible explanation for the sudden disappearance of these highly developed cultures.

When scientists claim the civilization abandoned a city for example in the 9th century AD, they are actually talking about the people who used the cities, not about the people who built the cities. That is quite a difference.

Because the pyramids are massively oriented towards the old North pole, the culture must have experienced the destructing pole shift. It would be very difficult to survive such a catastrophe. It is also likely that cultures were warped back into the stone age, and became scavenging nomads.

How the Rough Data Corresponds to the Found Intersection Clusters

The first intersection clusters showed a very tight relation with the temperature swings of the last glaciation cycles. The search for much more data of ancient structures had begun. | © 2016 by Buildreps
 

How to Interpret Glaciations

The temperatures on earth depend of the latitude where you are. It’s crucial to grasp that you can interpret a glacial period in two ways:

  1. The classical view: During a glaciation the geo pole was where it currently is, but the temperature changed. Which mechanism caused this glaciation is still unknown.
  2. The new view: A glaciation was caused by a crustal shift. The amount of shift corresponds to the temperature change of the glaciation cycle. The crustal shift moved the polar ice sheet to a warmer region and a warmer region into the polar section. When geologists examine the phenomenon with the assumption that the pole was fixed, the findings are interpreted as a global cooling down, which in fact never happened. At least not on this scale.

In the case that the poles shifted, the locations we find must correspond with the temperature changes between the two latitudes.

How Temperature Approximately Proceeds per Latitude

This graph gives an indication what happens when you change latitude. On the left is the North pole, on the right the South pole. Note the large difference. The North pole cold is transported by the Gulf Stream. | © 2016 by Buildreps
 

How Crustal Shifts Might Have Deluded Geologists

For example:

  • When the geo pole shifted from position 1 to position 2, it represents a shift from latitude 50° to latitude 62°. Which temperatures correspond with these latitudes? In the above graph you see that this shift exactly corresponds with the temperature variations between the different glaciations, approximately 8 to 9°C.
  • The shift from position 2 to position 3 is more erratic. The relative large variation of this corresponding two smaller ice ages, is altogether 11 to 12 °C. There appear to be two large groups of pyramids oriented to 2 separate hotspots around position 3. That indicates that the crustal shift from 2 to 3 went in two major steps. And exactly these traces are found back in both the temperature proxies of the ice cores of Dome-C and Vostok.

It must be said that the research is in full progress, and there are constantly new insights which will be added to the book. Not all insights are included in this article.

The Consequences of This Classification

This interpretation allows to date the cultures of former pyramid builders in a more reliable manner, via their orientation, which on its turn can be related to a glaciation cycle. Every glaciation cycle stands for an era. This way of chaining is only allowed when we can prove that the underlying mathematics is consistent and unambiguously.

Every crustal shift is followed by an alleged cooling down (that is because the classical view dictates that the crust is fixed). Polar ice sheets that have been shifted to warmer regions will cool that region, and the ice sheets will start to melt very slowly. Melting takes somewhere between 100,000 to 150,000 years. The warmer region that shifted to the pole becomes now cold as well. The melting energy must be provided by the Gulf Streams, that transports the energy from the equator to the icecaps (in accordance with the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics).

The result of this phenomenon is that the temperatures on earth dropped a little bit because of ice sheets that moved to a warmer region, and energy is pumped to the polar region. The shifted ice sheets cool the region in two ways, by reflection of sun light and convection.

The warmer region that moved to the pole receives less sun light and slowly cools down. The effect is a ripple of the global temperatures, but certainly no temperature change between 8° to 12°. This alleged change is caused by a huge misinterpretation of mainstream scientists.

The consequence of this classification is that ancient civilisations and the structures they built are much older than always assumed, and it literally dismisses the mainstream interpretations as adhoc and illogical.

This new interpretation explains glaciations and everything else in the most simple way and with the fewest assumptions, which is the major condition to comply to Occam’s Razor.

Gathered and Analyzed Data

Issue
Amount
Ancient Sites and Constructions
297
Countries
31
Found Orientation Clusters
5

Results of the Data Analyses

The analysis of the full dataset delivered spectacular results. The percentages are almost 100% and on top of that correspond the latitudes vs temperatures eerie precise with the last glaciation cycles. | © 2016 by Buildreps
 

How the Pole Moved FOUR Times Over the Last 340,000 Years

The four former poles are mathematically proven, the fifth former pole (41.2N) is yet unproven. This oldest and unproven pole is mainly formed by Sumerian and Peruvian sites. I need more sites to prove this pole. | © 2016 by Buildreps
 

Why Shifts the Crust in This Direction?

The most probable path of the pole is in the latitudinal direction. It is a direct result of physics. Similar as the reaction of a spinning top on an external force, it reacts in the perpendicular direction of its rotation, and that is why the crust shifted like this.

The forces in this case are the large tidal forces when earth is in a high eccentric orbit around the sun. The interconnectedness is deeper explained in this article:”Lost Civilizations and Earth Crust Shifts

Hold on to Your Chair – A Shortlist of Ancient Structures

Pole
Pyramids, Sites, Temples
I: 0 – 110,000 years ago
Borobudur, Konark Sun Temple, Temple of Horus, Pyramids of Giza, Tomb of Emperor Ping of Han
II: 110,000 – 220,000 years ago
Babylon, Prasat Phum Prasat, Uxmal (Pyramid of the magician), El Mirador, Ka’ba-ye Zartosht
III: 220,000 – 240,000 years ago
Teotihuacan, Pompeii (temples), Carnac, Edzna, Tomb of Emperor Zhao of Han, Antipatris
IV: 240,000 – 340,000 years ago
Yagul, Kuara (Sumer), Great Kyz Kala, El Castillo (Chichen Itza), Pyramid of Koh-Ker
V: 340,000 – 400,000 years ago
Tomb of Three Kings of Zhou, Der (Sumer), Nohoch Mul pyramid (Cobá), Caral, Madinet Habu temple, Borsippa (Sumer)
VI: 400,000 – 490,000 years ago
Nineveh (Sumer), Sippar (Sumer), Eridu (Sumer), Pyramids of Cochasqui (nr. 5, 9 ,14), Huaca del Sol, Zabala (Sumer), Caral

It is not difficult to see where the cradle of humanity lies. The Sumerian tablets are no fairytale, but a factual report. According to the tablets came the Nephilim to earth around 420,000 years. That seems to correspond surprisingly with the relative large amount of Sumerian cities which are oriented to the (yet unproven) pole VI.

Attentive readers might wonder what Pompeii is doing on this list. Common knowledge says about Pompeii:

Researchers believe that the town was founded in the seventh or sixth century BC by the Osci or Oscans. It came under the domination of Rome in the 4th century BC, and was conquered and became a Roman colony in 80 BC after it joined an unsuccessful rebellion against the Roman Republic.

The foundations of the temples of Pompeii, which are: the Basilica, the temple of Venus, and the temple of Apollo are between 220,000 and 240,000 years old.

That is the most unbelievable, and in the same time the most accurate truth.

Why Ice Ages Were Earth Crust Displacements

The theory shows how and why ice ages were caused by Earth Crust Shifts. The natural temperature swing of earth’s temperature (Bias) has to filtered out to find the magnitude of the crustal shift. Paleomagnetism delivers the final proof. | © 2016 by Buildreps
 

The Striking Similarities Between Orientations of Structures, Crustal Shifts, and Ice Ages

Crustal Shift
Degrees of Shift (Angle degrees)
Percentage
Degrees Temperature Change (Celsius)
Percentage
A
14
29%
9
28%
B
4.6
9%
3
9%
C
7.3
15%
5
16%
D
12.2
25%
8
25%
E
10.7
22%
7
22%
A to E
48.8
100%
32.5
100%

The Data

There is a large amount of data processed to calculate, to prove the position of the former poles, and also to calculate the reliability of this new theory.

The orientation of the foundations of ancient buildings, especially because they were processed in large numbers, gave profound insights in ancient times.

Ice age graphs correspond to the eccentricity of earth’s orbit over the last 800,000 years. The chance for these two graphs to correspond to eachother by chance is 0.0000000084%. Practically speaking – it is zero. It shows we have to look here (eccentric orbit) for the explanations of ice ages and nowhere else. That ice ages were in fact crustal shifts is also very sure as shown above.

As you might have discovered in the above graphs is that when the eccentricity becomes very high (this red line), the crust shifted two times (200 ky ago and 600 ky ago) in a row during that cycle. It shifts also quicker when the eccentricity is high, and shifts slower when the eccentricity is low. There are clear consistent patterns. I will explain these patterns deeper in the book, and will also explain more details about the mechanisms that runs these shifts.

The data indicates with a very high degree of certainty that the former pole was on Greenland. The crust has moved not just a bit, it moved significantly. It moved over an angle of 38° over the last 340,000 years.

The crust ticks like a clock on the Milankovitch cycles. That explains so much.

The Moving Crust Turns Everything Upside Down

Greenland (that is to say the whole crust) moved over the geo North pole between 250,000 and 110,000 years ago in two shifts, meaning that Greenland has three former geo pole locations. Similar as three fence poles have two distances in between. The Greenland ice sheet is a result from this era, and that is the reason why it is melting now.

Earth Crust Shifts do not happen overnight. It are slow, unstoppable processes that take place over extended periods of time. The most violent, swift crustal shifts took place over a period of about 25,000 years. The slowest ones over a period of about 100,000 years. But it is a period of constant turmoil, megaquakes, sloshing oceans, volcano eruptions, tsunamis, and a changing climate due to the shifting latitude. Sea levels will subsequently fall or rise depending of the position of the new geographic pole.

An Earth Crust Shift is not the spectacular event that many people think it is. It is a massive, slow, environmental disruptive process, which made many of the ancient peoples to migrate to other places. As if the colossal natural disasters weren’t enough – large migrations induced large scale conflicts between tribes. This is in a few words what happened to our ancient ancestors.

The Probability That the Whole Theory is Correct

The probability (chance) that temperature changes during the last ice ages accidentally correspond to the found orientation hotspots is 1 to 746,496 or 0.000134%. It is therefore for more than 99.99987% certain that this combination is true:

  • that the crust has shifted;
  • that the shifts relate to ice ages;
  • that ancient structures were oriented to these former geo poles;
  • that a high eccentric orbit around the Sun is the cause of crustal shifts.

We can safely conclude that the current dating methods of ancient structures are painfully wrong. The methods that mainstream science prefers to use can be dismissed as unreliable, irrational, and even unscientific. And that lies at the basis of a much bigger lie. The question is: is it done on purpose or is it pure ignorance? It is probably both.

The system we live in wants us to believe things that are apparently false.

Atlantis is Here

This new view will have consequences on many scientific disciplines. We have been fed with a constant stream of incorrect data, and lies. Of course will it take time for this theory to mature, and to be widely accepted as valid. The insights in this new theory are currently developing very rapidly.

An example of just one of the many profound implications this theory might have: how much chance is there that paleomagnetism, which is a highly technical and well funded discipline, developed a correct theory? Just for 50%. Yes, you read it correct. Why is that? Because it ignored and dismissed the possibility of a slow latitudinal crawling crust during high eccentric orbits of the earth around the sun. These crustal movements would also leave traces in the magnetizable sediments. There is no way to recognize from the samples alone what has moved – the core or the crust. Because of the fact that the magnetic core obviously moves, it is therefore not by definition the only variable that left traces.

The book “Atlantis is Here” will smash many paradigms to smithereens, not by swinging words at you, but by using mathematics in a way most people will understand. I hope I will be able to publish the book in 2017. There is still much work to be done before this monumental quest is complete.

The book “Atlantis is Here” will provide all the proof necessary to show what happened in the distant past. It will solve many mysteries, and it will raise many new questions at the same time.

© 2015, 2016 by Buildreps

First publication: 11 December 2015

Leave a Reply